Okay, so here are my thoughts:
1. Yes it's a high price.
2. Those are the prices this year. Look at the other trades. Tampa traded two 1st, a 2nd, and a 4th liner, for Oliver Bjorkstrand, a nothing prospect, and a 5th round pick. Try to look at the trade in that context. There are not many sellers, and there was no other legit #2 center we could acquire. As such, I'm fine with them paying it, especially if we can resign him.
3. Based on reading all the posts here, especially from Islanders fans and looking at the stats, it sounds like we're getting a really good player. Basically, at the very worst he's Burakovsky, except he's a natural center who wins a ton of faceoffs, and can play on the PK. Put him with literally any combination of our top 4 wingers and we should have two absolutely dominant lines.
4. Obviously Kylington refused to shave his beard, which is why Lou shipped him off to Anaheim immediately.
Guys it is what it is. We cannot and should not be saving future assets. Have we all forgotten where we were many years ago?
The time is now. We have to pay and go all in. Could care less about players that could potentially help in 2-5 years, Let's go.
I don't think people really understand that we have 2-3 seasons to max out our window. Then we'll have 2-3 mediocre seasons. And then suck for like 5. It's what is going to happen. I don't give a shit about these current assets. They wouldn't be useful for multiple years. And what do some guys want? To have Cal Ritchie scoring 40 points as the Avs miss the playoffs multiple seasons in a row.
Maximize the team NOW.
As I said above, I'm fine with this trade. However, as I've said many times before on this site, I hate this mindset that the future doesn't matter, or that we're doomed to suck in a few years. I for one still plan to be a fan in 10 years, and I don't particularly want to be cheering for a bottom feeder team. I think there's a balance to be struck between genuinely going for it, and still keeping enough fires burning for the future that you'll always be in the mix. So while I like the move for Nelson, since it fills a need, I don't like that we only have two picks in the first three rounds for the next three drafts, and CMac will probably trade those away too. If Nelson was the plan, was it really necessary to trade for Lindgren and Coyle as well? Especially since we have already moved out a 2026 2nd to get rid of Georgiev, a 2025 3rd for Trenin, a 2026 3rd for Duhaime, a 2025 1st to get rid of RyJo, and a 2025 2nd for Eller. I feel like as a GM, you need to have some kind of spending limit on futures so that the cupboard never becomes completely bare.
While I agree there are opportunities to recoup assets with offseason moves of guys like Colton, Wood, and a defenseman or two, at this point I assume those moves will be for short term gains. We'll have to really hope that some of our current prospects or AHLers turn into something, or we'll be having major depth issue before long, and then we'll inevitably become bottom feeders once MacKinnon and Makar decline.
If we win another cup this year, then fantastic, but even in the cup year, we didn't trade the 2023 1st, and we even moved our Ritchie equivalent (Newhook) for another 1st rather than short-term help. I know this is the Nelson thread and the main mistake way the Coyle trade, but they're all connected.
__________________________________
Anyway, the rosters are set so we can worry about all this in the offseason. I can't wait to watch the team we have while we have it.