Obviously this whole situation is not cut and dried. AM's camp is also playing with fire. There are no certainties in life and a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush all day long. For example let's say AM gives the leafs a 4-5 year deal so he can cash in big in his early 30's, that would be ludicrous. He may be injured (pretty likely with his history) or have diminishing skills. He would never get his big payday at that point.
AM can have an 8 year guaranteed income right now at a reasonable ($13-$14M) salary, not one I am advocating for but whatever. His camp would be nuts to reject it.
I'm fine with trading him as I feel he isn't the type of player (for me) you tie all your horses to. Great skill, no doubt but he is too noncombative or enough I want to win at all cost. Even Crosby has more pushback and many smaller players do. His injury history is also worrisome.
Tough decision for both sides to make. I don't like giving any player such a long term deal unless it is a truly elite player (Gretz, Mario, Orr, McD) AM is not them.
Pasta gave the Bruins a reasonable deal, Drais did as well, Mac, etc. Why is it always the Leafs that get raked over the coals with greedy players. Some would argue AM is not better than these players but will command more money and so will MM.
Kraken have gone further in two years with no star players than this sad bunch.
Give me heart and soul players all day long, they may not win but the effort will always be there and that's something to cheer for. This lot doesn't win and it only leaves you bitter and resentful because they chased the $.