authentic
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2015
- 26,641
- 11,606
This roster didn’t amount to anything post season with depth like Kerfoot making 3.5 million.
And some want to make it 1-3 million worse..
That extra money is going to cut into our “players that play more than 13 minutes a night budget.
I’d go on but you get it.
Please show me where depth quality is correlated with money spent on that depth. Fixing our depth is more than just trading Matthews for cap space and overpaying grinders that rode a hot shooting % for a series or two.
Everyone praises Vegas’ depth, let’s see how much they actually spent on it:
Forward expenses outside the top 6:
Roy 3
Stephenson 2.75
Howden 1.5
Carrier 1.4
Kolesar 1.4
Amadio 0.76
So just under 11 mil for their bottom 6
How is this different (from a cap perspective) from:
Kerfoot 3.5
Jarnkrok 2.1
Kampf 1.6
Acciari 1.25
Lafferty 1.15
ZAR/Engvall/Simmonds/McMann/Holmberg at a mil or less
We spent more than them, we actually have more cap space for forward depth available than they do if we redistribute it to better players than we have in the past.
Let’s see the defense, outside of their top 2 they spend:
1 of Martinez/Theodore at 5.2
McNabb at 2.85
Whitecloud at 2.75
Hague at 2.3
Hutton at 0.85
Vs
Holl at 2
Liljegren at 1.4
McCabe at 2
Whichever of Schenn/Gio at under a mil
The glaring difference is us missing a Martinez tier 5+ mil D which we had but got broken down. Muzzin’s 5.6 mil LTIR wasn’t able to be used until he got injured in October, otherwise we would have almost the same spend on our D depth with just over a mil in difference.
It’s incredibly obvious the issue with our depth isn’t the amount of money we’re spending on it, we spend more on it than most cup winners and contenders, even the ones that get praised for the quality of their depth.
Trade Matthews if you don’t think he has what it takes to win in general, but trade him for premium star pieces or futures, not so you can give 5x5 to the next Coleman/Goodrow.
Oh no, there goes their whole argument