WillNy29
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2018
- 1,195
- 1,433
He literally finished top 3 in selke voting and Matthews regularly finishes top 10 in forward defensive categories every year. its ok not to downplay things your teams players are good at just because you want to throw them in the garbage.There's some gray area in there, but generally speaking, it's impossible to win a Cup with too much cap hit tied into a few players, especially if those players aren't as great as other players who are being paid similarly.
The Oilers are flawed and top-heavy, but their two superstars are so great, if they happen to land a goalie who can get hot for a few weeks, or some of their younger, cheap players like Holloway, Bourgault, and Broberg can surprise, they have a reasonable chance of making a serious run. But it's possible because they have guys who score on par with Gretzky and Lemieux in the playoffs. If McDavid and Draisaitl were scoring like Matthews and Marner in the playoffs, they would have zero shot, regardless of their lucky goalie.
Tkachuk didn't produce playoff points at this level while in Calgary but he's a bad example to choose because he's a unicorn who brings so many intangibles to the table. Plus, consider that Tkachuk just signed a long-term deal this past summer for 9.5 mil (after coming off a 40 goal, 100+ point season) and we willingly paid Mitch Marner 10.8 a few years ago?? Lmao. We're also likely going to submit to Matthews and pay him 14 mil a pop?? You can't compare these guys to Matt Tkachuk and his 9.5 cap hit for 8 years.
And you're talking about a 200-foot game like Matthews and Marner are Bob Gainey and Bobby Clarke when they're far from it. If we thought 200-foot game players are the recipe for success we should trade Marner for Scott Laughton tonight and shouldn't even consider paying Matthews a dollar more than he makes right now.
All I am saying is everyone is getting hung up on dumb things here rather than being rational. It's ok to trade players off your team but you also can't act as if they're very meh players and then expect a big haul and also then expect the team to somehow magically get better. it doesn't make sense. I watched the oilers series since they got swept the first time and outside of the run to WCF the two guys up front really didn't accomplish much either. You heard rumblings of people calling McDavid McCasper the friendly ghost (and that's not fair to him or Draisalt because it's a team game and im a huge fan of both players). But even this last playoff after the LA series Draisalt and McDavid were very subpar 5 on 5 for their level of skill. Hell Draisatl went 0g 1a -7 in his last 4 games and McDavid had 1 ESG in that time frame and was -1. I expect more from Matthews and I'm pretty damn annoyed with the way Marner plays in the playoffs but I thought Matthews was a beast in the Tampa series (both of them) and the stats (advanced and scoring metrics) point to that being the case.
The team needs to rebalance and whether that's done by trading Marner or waiting out the Tavares contract that's on the GM. but to say you don't have arguably one of the top 5 centres in hockey on your team just so you can give him away is asinine. If we believe AM and Marner are limp dicks then who is going to trade us enough for them to make the team better? we're likely looking at another 5-10 years of rebuilding and trying to make the playoffs if we blow it up just like Buffalo