If you swap out a Vegas player for Matthews do they still win the cup?
In theory, yes. Say you swap Eichel for Matthews, in terms of
player vs. player, yes VGK still wins. But Matthews currently makes 1.8 mil more than Eichel, which means Vegas might have had to lose a valuable depth piece in the process like Barbashev. And, Matthews next deal could pay him 3.5 to 4.5 mil more than Eichel -- in that case, Vegas loses an impact player or a couple of significant depth pieces.
I don't think fans are dogging on Matthews or Marner
just to pick on them. We have an issue with the salary they are being paid for what they're producing
when it matters most. And their next contracts are going to make it even harder for the Leafs to build a viable contender around them. Equally as frustrating as their cap hits are their attitudes. Both players clearly have entitlement issues and care more about draining the Leafs dry then committing to the team and helping them build a true Cup contender.
Imho, if you are going to pay an icon elite max money, they better be a Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl, Cale Makar, Sidney Crosby, Nate MacKinnon -- players who have the make-up, drive, intangibles, and pedigree to rise to the occasion. If not, you're stuck paying premium money for players who can't get it done and that handcuffs your franchise.
Living in Philly I saw the same thing with the Flyers for years -- they were paying Giroux and Voracek what the Pens were paying Sid and Geno, the Hawks were paying Kane and Toews, and the Kings were paying Kopitar and Doughty. The key difference is, they were not the same caliber of players, yet they were being paid on par, simply because they were
the best on the Flyers.
Just because Matthews and Marner are the Leafs picks, and two of their best players, doesn't mean they deserve to be paid like McDavid and Draisaitl.