Steamwhistle
Registered User
About as dense as the people who think this had any malicious intent to it whatsoever.
This, lol.
Seriously, some of the people on this forum could work for the Toronto media the way they can stretch a story.
About as dense as the people who think this had any malicious intent to it whatsoever.
the people that need to grow up are those that are offended
Right. Because being offended at childish, homophobic remarks that imply incest and that are made on public radio is a sign of immaturity whereas the people making the remarks are stand-up citizens.the people that need to grow up are those that are offended
Your conclusion makes absolutely zero sense.
the people that need to grow up are those that are offended
About as dense as the people who think this had any malicious intent to it whatsoever.
About as dense as the people who think this had any malicious intent to it whatsoever.
You are aware they are both men, right? It's not difficult to tell. They look somewhat alike.If Jamie was infact implying sexual context in that comment, that would be implying incest not a homosexual relationship.
Man people get offended about anything these days. Starting to understand why Marshawn Lynch replies how he does. You say the slightest thing and the internet portrays it as you are the next Hitler.
Sure he may have been a little off but this is so minute compared to other things that have been said
In their opinion, they suggest that the Sedins are strange and possibly engage in an incestual relationship with each other. That's an odd opinion.
'who knows what else they do together' is the evidence.
Typical of the internet, people immediately accuse them of implying a serious accusation of incest on a harmless, albiet stupid, joke. Probably the type of thing that would be said at a social gathering talking hockey with friends. Probably doesn't fit the code of conduct for media interviews though.
Well, first off.. thanks for calling me dense. Great way to start a debate I appreciate that.
If Jamie was infact implying sexual context in that comment, that would be implying incest not a homosexual relationship. Everyone knows the Sedins are both married to females and not gay.
I strongly disagree that Jamie was implying sexual context in his comment, the interview started by saying "They sleep together on the road" -- "What else do they do together?" do they shower together, do they brush each others teeth, do they eat breakfast together, do they go to the same restaurant together, etc. etc. etc.
It was a joke that they do everything together, sorry you didn't see it as such.
I dont think its funny at all.
Marginalizing twins, the gay community, implying incest with homophobic connotations. That is unacceptable for professional athletes especially when speaking on a public platform. The interviewer baited, they took it. Learn some basic PR if you want to be a pro athlete. Best way for an organization to teach its employees some PR 101: fine them and make them give a public apology.
This goes for any service that is for the public, whether youre working at a corner store and drop an F bomb and offend someone or you are on these guys level.
The fact that the radio station attempted to delete the part of the show where that situation went down should tell you enough about how to deal with this.
Shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that Benn and Seguin are pretty big **********.
I remember the All-Star commercial when the other players ordered "Swedish twins" into their hotel room which was as "outrageous" as this.. You people offended should look what else is going on around the world..
I don't think they should be fined because at the end of the day Seguin and Benn embarrassed themselves more than they hurt the Sedins feelings by making those childish comments.
Yes having wives and being brothers automatically negates the fact that a man having sex with a man is defined "homosexual"
If a guy kills a man while robbing a bank, he's still a bank robber in addition to being a murderer. I can't believe someone's even qualifying these comments by saying "oh there's no double insult, just the one appalling one"