ATD2025 Trade Thread

[BenchBrawl]

Post your trades and discussion of trades here.

Trades countdown:
nabby12: 1
spitsfan24: 1
Boreal01: 1
rmartin65: 1
Hitru & Professor What: 1
BenchBrawl: 1
Habsfan18: 1
Claude the Fraud: 1

Full set of picks:

To Hitru & Professor What: 14th set
To BenchBrawl: 6th set

Trades:

To nabby12: 24th, 64th
To spitsfan24: 28th, 53th

To rmartin65: 45, 85, 156
To Boreal01: 56, 65, 145

To BenchBrawl: 54, 67, 107
To Hitru & Professor What: 46, 86, 115

To Habsfan18: 50, 71, 111
To Claude the Fraud: 58, 63, 98

Click to read more...

 

[spitsfan24]

To @nabby12: Picks 24 and 137

To myself: Picks 28 and 93

 

[tinyzombies]

To @nabby12: Picks 24 and 117

To myself: Picks 28 and 93

I’ll Vote yes

 

[ImporterExporter]

Seems fair to me. A 1 round jump a few rounds down the line to move up 4 spots for a specific player now isn't egregious.

 

[BenchBrawl]

Meh, I don't like it, but OK

Trade away

 

[nabby12]

Meh, I don't like it, but OK

Trade away

What don't you like about it?

 

[BenchBrawl]

What don't you like about it?

I think this is robbery on your part, but not big enough to warrant veto. The vetoing process is in place to avoid draft-breaking trades. This ain't it so I'm fine with it.

 

[ImporterExporter]

I mean it's a bit more than I'd want to personally drop 3 rounds from now, but we have to remember we're in the absolute premium part of the draft where pillars are still being selected. I think spits probably gets slightly better value in the grand scheme gaining just over a round jump but it's not like it's the next set of picks.

 

[spitsfan24]

There was a numbering error. It's actually pick 137, not 107. My apologies.

I have edited the original post.

 

[spitsfan24]

@ImporterExporter @BenchBrawl

To @nabby12: Picks 24 and 137

To myself: Picks 28 and 93

 

[BenchBrawl]

@ImporterExporter @BenchBrawl

To @nabby12: Picks 24 and 137

To myself: Picks 28 and 93

From 137 to 93 for a 4 picks jump?

I don't think this is fair. This is an enormous fkn jump.

 

[ImporterExporter]

Yeah, I mean 2 rounds does seem pretty steep to move over 3 GM's now. I honestly feel like the other trade was numerically more even.

 

[BenchBrawl]

Re-work this thing out, fellas.

 

[Professor What]

I don't like this one myself either. Something along the lines of what IE proposed in the draft thread would be far more equitable.

 

[nabby12]

We are going with IE's suggestion.
The re-worked deal is:
24
64

for

28
53

 

[Professor What]

I vote yes.

 

[BenchBrawl]

I still think this is insane but I give the green light.

nabby getting fleeced. What's not to like?

Nah, seriously, this is pretty bad, but at least it stays within close rounds.

Go ahead and pick.

 

[ImporterExporter]

Good to go fellas.

 

[spitsfan24]

I still think this is insane but I give the green light.

nabby getting fleeced. What's not to like?

I don't agree with this at all.

I don't think this is anywhere close to a fleece for me.

 

[nabby12]

I still think this is insane but I give the green light.

nabby getting fleeced. What's not to like?

Nah, seriously, this is pretty bad, but at least it stays within close rounds.

Go ahead and pick.

What's the reasoning for this being "insane" "fleeced" etc?

I'm getting a four pick jump now, versus going down 11 picks in a later round.

 

[BenchBrawl]

I don't agree with this at all.

I don't think this is anywhere close to a fleece for me.

I'm an expert in fleecing people in trades. I know a fleece when I see one.

What's the reasoning for this being "insane" "fleeced" etc?

I'm getting a four pick jump now, versus going down 11 picks in a later round.

It's alright, you can make your pick. You got your wish. Just go ahead. Moving on.

 

[Hawkey Town 18]

To @nabby12: Picks 24 and 137

To myself: Picks 28 and 93

Would be helpful if GMs could also put the pick difference and round numbers when posting trades, like this:

24 (2nd) and 137 (7th)
For
28 (2nd) and 93 (5th)

+4, -44

This feels like a very big a payment to move up 4 spots. I get that it’s in the 2nd round, but a 5th rounder is still a core player. Would like to hear others’ opinions.

We are going with IE's suggestion.
The re-worked deal is:
24
64

for

28
53

Sorry didn’t see the re-work. This is better

 

[tinyzombies]

From 137 to 93 for a 4 picks jump?

I don't think this is fair. This is an enormous fkn jump.

Yea but there’s a bit of a drop off after Ovechkin

 

[Boreal01]

@rmartin65 receives: 45, 85, 156

I receive: 56, 65, 145

 

[rmartin65]

@rmartin65 receives: 45, 85, 156

I receive: 56, 65, 145

Confirmed.

Who can take a one name list in case we don’t get enough approvals before I go to bed?