Exactly. I also have everything set through my Elisa Viihde package that includes most of the interesting sports channels. I think the teams that I will be following closely this season are definitely Ilves, HPK (because of Vesalainen, Luukkonen and many other interesting prospects), HIFK (because of Heiskanen), Ässät (if Kotkaniemi gets to play), Jukurit (if Kokkonen will get to play), SaiPa (because of Vaakanainen) and maybe even KalPa (to see Luostarinen develop and maybe even Leevi Aaltonen make his debut?)It's going to be an exciting Liiga season, I'm getting that 6month Ruutu+ deal once the season starts.
Connor hasn't played C for 3.5 seasons, when he was 16. He's a winger.
Not directed at you garret9, just a jumping off point...
After a few days of reflection this comment sort of jumped out at me. There's no complaint in this comment, simply observation + clarification. FWIW I was pretty happy with this pick (Vesalainen). Didn't love it but given where we picked I was quite pleased. That said there has been the usual amount of angst, which is normal and fine. But one of the most consistent comments is that we picked a "least tradeable" asset in the form of a winger and that's been disappointing. That too is a reasonable statement for what it's worth.
I remember back to the draft where we got Connor. We were all pretty much over the moon ( a few dissenters wanted another highly touted pick) and had a good chuckle at the Bruins for their three in a row. We've been, to varying degrees, pretty high on Connor and I would think most expect him to be with the big club this year. That brings me back to Garret's comment about Connor being a winger. We didn't have those comments about him at that time, did we? I don't recall a lot of people saying "oh no, a winger, really?" or anything along the line of what we've seen to a degree with Vesalainen.
So why are so many annoyed/aggravated/irritated/whathaveyou about Vesalainen being a winger? Sure, we don't have a burning need in the short term but even if he follows Connor's relatively speedy path he's three years out from cracking the NHL as a regular. At that point Perreault has one year left on his deal and is 30+. Wheeler is 3 years older and perhaps not a first line winger any longer (which I admit Vesalainen may never achieve). If he was BPA on the Jets list he'll still fill a need down the road and not in a particularly unsuitable timeline for our team.
Not directed at you garret9, just a jumping off point...
After a few days of reflection this comment sort of jumped out at me. There's no complaint in this comment, simply observation + clarification. FWIW I was pretty happy with this pick (Vesalainen). Didn't love it but given where we picked I was quite pleased. That said there has been the usual amount of angst, which is normal and fine. But one of the most consistent comments is that we picked a "least tradeable" asset in the form of a winger and that's been disappointing. That too is a reasonable statement for what it's worth.
I remember back to the draft where we got Connor. We were all pretty much over the moon ( a few dissenters wanted another highly touted pick) and had a good chuckle at the Bruins for their three in a row. We've been, to varying degrees, pretty high on Connor and I would think most expect him to be with the big club this year. That brings me back to Garret's comment about Connor being a winger. We didn't have those comments about him at that time, did we? I don't recall a lot of people saying "oh no, a winger, really?" or anything along the line of what we've seen to a degree with Vesalainen.
So why are so many annoyed/aggravated/irritated/whathaveyou about Vesalainen being a winger? Sure, we don't have a burning need in the short term but even if he follows Connor's relatively speedy path he's three years out from cracking the NHL as a regular. At that point Perreault has one year left on his deal and is 30+. Wheeler is 3 years older and perhaps not a first line winger any longer (which I admit Vesalainen may never achieve). If he was BPA on the Jets list he'll still fill a need down the road and not in a particularly unsuitable timeline for our team.
U18 MVP and scoring leader at #24 is absolutely steal. Yes there is character issue and it's called being a finn. Im sure you're already familiar with it, one seems to be inwards on discussion, lack of interest, awkward, response very little if at all, avoid eye contact. He will be fine, Armia and Laine will be perfect mentors for him.
By the time Vesalainen is entering the NHL, Wheeler will likely be in his 33-35 YO season and Perrault will be in 32-33 YO season, possibly starting their declines. Having Vesalainen break in around then wouldn’t be such a bad thing at all
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=2358781
review of finish prospects prior to draft. many had vaseline as number 3 or 4 finnish prospect.
Interesting more seemed to have him ahead of Valimaki. Only constant is Heiskanen at the top and then the rest of the other top prospects interchanged based on personnel preference.
somewhat unbiased as prior to draft. most had above valimaki.
perhaps we referred valimaki based on defensive need.
Seemed like a good interview. He seems like he speaks English better than he understands it...so sometimes he comes across as arrogant.
He doesn't seem to like to be asked about Liane though...imagine going out on a date and all your date does is ask about your hotter friend.
Yeah I hope the media doesn't go completely crazy with the Laine talk.
"Is he your role model?"
"How awesome is it going to be to play with the greatest finnish prospect since Selanne?"
"Do you like his smell?"
"Have you guys already swapped your underwear? Just because it's funny?"
Yeah I hope the media doesn't go completely crazy with the Laine talk.
"Is he your role model?"
"How awesome is it going to be to play with the greatest finnish prospect since Selanne?"
"Do you like his smell?"
"Have you guys already swapped your underwear? Just because it's funny?"