LeBrun: Askarov available

preds1

Registered User
Apr 2, 2010
3,010
226
TN
Seems the article just predicts Trotz might be open to the idea of moving Askarov, like he was last year, for a young offensive talent. If there's nothing interesting, no big deal. Article is just a prediction of GM doing GM stuff at the draft.
 

Double Dion

Jets fan 28/06/2014
Feb 9, 2011
11,771
4,554
By what metric was he 17th best? Did you see the December/January he had?
They don't track advanced goalie stats in the AHL. He was 17th in save percentage among goalies with 25 games or more. He had good months and horrible months. One month doesn't really matter.
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,152
14,535
Kansas City, MO
What if the player wants to move given that he’s less likely to become a starter in the foreseeable future
He’s not even an NHLer yet. No team is just going to hand him starter’s duties in the next couple of years. And if they did, it would probably be some piss poor team that constantly ruins young players by providing no insulation or development runway.

For all we know, the plan could be to significantly lighten Saros’s huge workload - seeing as they just invested so heavily in him and his high number of starts no doubt contributed to fatigue and poor results this past year.

Askarov could be in line for a very good amount of starts these next few years as he attempts to develop into the next Russian star in net. If after 2-3 years he clearly needs to be a 1A somewhere, that bridge can be crossed then.

It seems entirely premature to write off Askarov’s place in Nashville and his ability to get the same amount of games there as he develops as he would elsewhere. In the meantime - best case scenario - having an Ullmark/Swayman scenario seems pretty good for everybody.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Porter Stoutheart

Larrys13

Registered User
Aug 14, 2020
94
82
He’s not even an NHLer yet. No team is just going to hand him starter’s duties in the next couple of years. And if they did, it would probably be some piss poor team that constantly ruins young players by providing no insulation or development runway.

For all we know, the plan could be to significantly lighten Saros’s huge workload - seeing as they just invested so heavily in him and his high number of starts no doubt contributed to fatigue and poor results this past year.

Askarov could be in line for a very good amount of starts these next few years as he attempts to develop into the next Russian star in net. If after 2-3 years he clearly needs to be a 1A somewhere, that bridge can be crossed then.

It seems entirely premature to write off Askarov’s place in Nashville and his ability to get the same amount of games there as he develops as he would elsewhere. In the meantime - best case scenario - having an Ullmark/Swayman scenario seems pretty good for everybody.

Trouba and Sykora if we trade Shesty
 

Prairie Habs

Registered User
Oct 3, 2010
12,266
13,404
Read the article unlike everyone else so you can know Askarov isn’t actually available or being shopped.

Isn’t there a speculation title that’s more appropriate for this thread? There’s no rumor.

He'll love being a backup for the next 9 years, I guess
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,152
14,535
Kansas City, MO
Askarov is not enough to move into the top 5 in the draft. Preds would have to package Askarov with something else.
Well...THEY AREN'T SHOPPING HIM.

They received a ton of calls and put something out there pretty unrealistic to say "hey, we know you guys might want him in your system but it would take a literal top 5 pick to get us interested...if you offer that, sure we'd be willing to listen."

That's the report. That's literally the report. There is nothing that says:

"The Preds are looking to move Askarov."

"The Preds are trying to cut bait on their losses and let Askarov leave for a low price."

"Askarov has asked out because as a prospect with basically no experience, he is demanding to be an NHL starter next year and feels Saros is blocking him."

None of that.
 

Connor McConnor

Registered User
Nov 22, 2017
5,516
6,595

This is brutal. Trotz is on glue. Resign the old shrimp for awful contract and trade the future star… SMH
Future star? You have one of the best most consistent goalies in the league showing no signs of slowing down. 29 is not “old shrimp” for a goalie
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,589
3,617
Los Angeles
Well...THEY AREN'T SHOPPING HIM. They received a ton of calls and put something out there pretty unrealistic to say "hey, we know you guys might want him in your system but it would take a literal top 5 pick to get us interested".
Uh, that is a negotiating tactic. You ask for the moon in return, interested teams start a bidding war and eventually the asking price gets brought down with still a good return.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad