boompuffboom
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2007
- 1,136
- 594
Ya i'd rather keep Lehk over 2 -2nd rd picks as we have enough picks for now, But won't cry over 2 more 2nds .2 2nd's but honestly i wanna keep him around.
It's weird cause he scored 18 as a rookie, maybe Pleky took him under his wing and taught him the art of drilling it into the goalies crest, should be a 30 goal guy with the chances he gets2nd and something.
Guy is elite at shooting the puck either wide, or into the goalies chest.
That said, he is pretty damn good on the forecheck. Works hard. He'll bring enough you won't hate him when he misses golden opportunities.
what's the scouting report on nils ?He'll be tradedto NYR for Nils Lundkvist. This has been my take for a while.
Seems like a prospect struggling, would prefer good picks.what's the scouting report on nils ?
He'll be tradedto NYR for Nils Lundkvist. This has been my take for a while.
Seems like a prospect struggling, would prefer good picks.
I will guarantee you Lehkonen does not get you Lundkvist.
And Lundkvist is not struggling. He is doing well in Hartford and was a casualty of playing with Nemeth.
He needs time to adapt to N.A and is literally only still in the AHL because Schneider is playing so well just now.
No team wants Drouin, and Hoffman will not get much more than a bag of used pucks.Same. I would trade Drouin, Hoffman and Dvorak before him.
I agree, if he is traded, he will be packaged with picks and other assets to try and get a top forward.I am a Habs fan and I agree with this. Of course I have been a huge fan of his since before the draft (I thought he should have gone in the 15-20 OA range, maybe was too optimistic but well..) I thought he would have made the jump a bit earlier but still believe he sould be a top 4 in the coming years. If NYR for some reason decided to trade him (stacked on D and preferring Schneider or whatever), I think he'd be part of a larger package for a more important piece. But as a Habs fan I hope the other poster is right and that MTL gets him for that price
The problem we have is that NYR have sooo many bottom six forwards, some are even playing the top 6 due to injuries.I’d do Kravtsov and a 4th for Lehkonen.
Lehkonen helps give NYR some bottom 6 depth for the next 2 playoff runs, maybe more if they don’t have to trade him because of cap issues.
For MTL, I’m sure Gorton and Bobrov both still think highly of Kravtsov. He was their guy at 9OA. He should have been in the nhl this season if he just reported for his conditioning stint in Hartford for 2 weeks or so. But that’s neither here nor there atm.
Habs will likely be able to give him top 9 ice time, and if he hits his ceiling, they come out at winners in the trade adding a cost controlled 1St rd talent, for a good 3rd liner that needs a raise next season.
Plus an extra 4th round pick.
I think this type of deal has a lot of potential. If Lehkonen was signed like Connor brown terms, (1.5 mill for the next 2seasons), I’d say the rangers would even add a little more.
But having just signed Goodrow to a big deal, plus Blais needing a raise, and Rooney next season, the financial side of this trade has to be a factor, it can’t be a video game unrealistic trade.
I highly doubt anyone is trade a 1st for Lehkonen at 2.3 needing a raise next season, but if Gorton gets that more power to him.
I think his value is likely a 2nd+ prospect that has a lower ceiling then krav.
Habs have a lot of draft picks, I think that’s why they’d like to get prospects that can step in and play next season.
Imo this is a realistic fair deal for both teams. NYR gets immediate bottom 6 depth going into the postseason and krav likely starts next season in the habs top 9.
If Krav tops out, it’s a runaway win of a trade for MTL, getting a cheap, big, skilled top 6 asset for a solid 3rd liner with gaining cap room as well.
For NYR, they trade the potentially long term better asset for immediate help, but with how much krav/Drury hate each other, he’s never likely to help the rangers win by playing for them ever again....
I think both sides take the gamble.
TO NYR-Lehkonen
To MTL-Kravtsov + LV 4th rd pick
Flame away....
The problem we have is that NYR have sooo many bottom six forwards, some are even playing the top 6 due to injuries.
However, Lehkonen will not get you Kravtsov let alone NYR adding a pick. The Rangers wont just give up prospects and picks for depth help, they will package assets to get a decent top 6 player and Lehkonen is not that player.
the problem arises, when (or better: if) weber and price both return to the active roster.they just removed 4+ mill and guys like petry and chiarot are soon gone. Weber is not their problem if he retires etc..
habs are not a bottom feeder franchise; they're not moving everyone for sake of trades, hughes said as much today.
No reason to trade him unless big overpay.
Weber will not return, Price may still but for sure Weber won’t as even the players have said he’s basically retired. As for Price he’s hinted in his latest PC that he’s still injured and working his way back. The rate he’s going it’s likely fifty fifty he’ll ever play again. Our Capfrienndly is a shit show because of Covid we went into the year with space and we’re trading assets so I think we will be finethe problem arises, when (or better: if) weber and price both return to the active roster.
Why? If you know anything about NHL and training, this is not something that teams usually do. I've heard countless accounts from Finnish players who say that they're almost never told what or how to work out, you're expected to know.Get him a shooting coach for this long summer, it's the only toolset that he needs to work on to finally stabilize a top6 role. I'm somewhat impressed that MTL coaches and gms never did that for him.
He'll be tradedto NYR for Nils Lundkvist. This has been my take for a while.
I think he has the Goodrow, Hartman, Coleman type of value in that a first round pick.
He may not be a sexy pickup but he can play up and down your lineup, great penalty killer, great motor. He is the type of player that all coaches love.
you're expected to know.