Player Discussion Artemi Panarin

RagFinMet

Registered User
Jan 5, 2019
561
798
He played like his first year here and he carried that line
That line doesnt work under gallant
But now with creating more nz TOs and panarin playing more agressive they most certainly can be a great line for us throughout the year
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,188
57,148
In High Altitoad
Absolutely. Im a critic but that was a Panarin last night that we havent seen since before the pandemic

Its easy to forget but he also started out on fire last season too.

Panarin was great in October then fell off in November, was just there in December and most of January (the Kravtsov effect) and then was pretty good to just flat out good for the rest of the regular season.

The level of his positive impact is going to completely hinge on his ability to produce on transition opportunities (until he is willing to feed into a cycle.) We saw it in the 3rd period yesterday where instead of just throwing the puck around the walls to a team mate, he tried to fire a pass that had no chance of getting through (this almost went the other way.) Then again, on that same shift, the Rangers recovered the puck, regrouped, and then he fired a f***ing seed over to Schneider for a good scoring chance (right before Dahlin's penalty on Chytil.) Did he f*** up once? Yeah but did he also immediately make up for it? Also yes.

The one thing he DID do yesterday that we didn't see a whole lot of last year (or the year before) is make plays with out a ton of space and bodies in his face. He had heavy pressure on the NYR side of the CI line at least three times that I noticed where he was able to throw the puck up ice and beat the pressure which led to either a good scoring chance or an odd man rush. Loved that he followed up his own shot to set up the first goal too, don't remember the last time I saw that from him either and his game has very much become one and done.
 

Levitate

Registered User
Jul 29, 2004
31,437
8,775
I think a lot of guys on the rangers last year started strong and then struggled as the team was unlucky at first, Gallant juggled lines, things got mixed around, and they were bleeding chances against with Igor playing below his average. instead of thinkign "hey we're unlucky but we're generating a lot" it was "we need to change what we're doing and get back to firewagon hockey" and gallant let them do that
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
34,466
52,315
Its easy to forget but he also started out on fire last season too.

Panarin was great in October then fell off in November, was just there in December and most of January (the Kravtsov effect) and then was pretty good to just flat out good for the rest of the regular season.

The level of his positive impact is going to completely hinge on his ability to produce on transition opportunities (until he is willing to feed into a cycle.) We saw it in the 3rd period yesterday where instead of just throwing the puck around the walls to a team mate, he tried to fire a pass that had no chance of getting through (this almost went the other way.) Then again, on that same shift, the Rangers recovered the puck, regrouped, and then he fired a f***ing seed over to Schneider for a good scoring chance (right before Dahlin's penalty on Chytil.) Did he f*** up once? Yeah but did he also immediately make up for it? Also yes.

The one thing he DID do yesterday that we didn't see a whole lot of last year (or the year before) is make plays with out a ton of space and bodies in his face. He had heavy pressure on the NYR side of the CI line at least three times that I noticed where he was able to throw the puck up ice and beat the pressure which led to either a good scoring chance or an odd man rush. Loved that he followed up his own shot to set up the first goal too, don't remember the last time I saw that from him either and his game has very much become one and done.
iu


:laugh:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Filthy Dangles

JMan74

Registered User
Jun 27, 2019
167
131
That ultra deferential Panarin sure looks like a function of that not well structured Gallant system.

This is what Artemi should look like in a better system .
 

80shockeywasbuns

Registered User
Feb 12, 2022
1,995
3,473
That ultra deferential Panarin sure looks like a function of that not well structured Gallant system.

This is what Artemi should look like in a better system .
Definitely a much better neutral zone scheme helping them get transition looks. But more importantly this is what he looks like with linemates that actually make sense (not 4th liners or washed guys). Also one less transition stifling oaf in the lineup from previous years (Hajek/Nemeth/Harpur/Mikkola).
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMan74

JMan74

Registered User
Jun 27, 2019
167
131
As long as his pluses far out number his negatives I look at him as an asset. If he gives a full effort I see no reason he should not be fine.
Our 5v5 offensive production was absolute garbage relative to the scoring talent on the team under Gallant .

It will likely change if/when Lavys system proves to be one that puts these players in better position to succeed. And there are definitely signs pointing to this early on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

NickyFotiu

NYR 2024 Cup Champs!
Sep 29, 2011
15,801
7,550
Give credit were credit is due. Bread knew he came up short last season. He came in this season trying to change that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trilobyte

QJL

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
6,321
4,664
He looks fantastic. The best I’ve seen him play since his first season with the team. I’d love to see it finally carry into the playoffs, but initial results are promising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

chosen

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
12,543
5,016
ASPG
Its easy to forget but he also started out on fire last season too.

Panarin was great in October then fell off in November, was just there in December and most of January (the Kravtsov effect) and then was pretty good to just flat out good for the rest of the regular season.

The level of his positive impact is going to completely hinge on his ability to produce on transition opportunities (until he is willing to feed into a cycle.) We saw it in the 3rd period yesterday where instead of just throwing the puck around the walls to a team mate, he tried to fire a pass that had no chance of getting through (this almost went the other way.) Then again, on that same shift, the Rangers recovered the puck, regrouped, and then he fired a f***ing seed over to Schneider for a good scoring chance (right before Dahlin's penalty on Chytil.) Did he f*** up once? Yeah but did he also immediately make up for it? Also yes.

The one thing he DID do yesterday that we didn't see a whole lot of last year (or the year before) is make plays with out a ton of space and bodies in his face. He had heavy pressure on the NYR side of the CI line at least three times that I noticed where he was able to throw the puck up ice and beat the pressure which led to either a good scoring chance or an odd man rush. Loved that he followed up his own shot to set up the first goal too, don't remember the last time I saw that from him either and his game has very much become one and done.

Face it.

Your name sucketh.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad