AlternateSideParking
Registered User
- Dec 11, 2005
- 21,606
- 5,139
His injury did have an effect, I agree. Good to see him back to being much better.
Doughty is awfully good offensively, but that Blackhawks goal sure did show how the Kings are not bullet proof at all.
Seabrook is hot garbage.
I'm going to enjoy watching all four lines blow by his slow ass.
He makes Girardi seem as quick as Paul Coffey.
how was that not a head shot penalty?
Crawford is not a consistently top echelon goaltender, but there are games where he gets it done. He has done it at times over the last few seasons. Luckily for the Blackhawks, he seems to be doing that tonight, so far.
Agreed.
If Chicago wins this, they have the series. imo.
He's become Souray. Big shot, occasional big hit, and slow as balls.
Plus some lazy bullshucks where he literally gives up on plays.
His rebound control is brutal. He kicks out numerous pucks right into the middle of the ice. That's the beauty of Hank, he kicks out stuff to the corners. It worked against him when Galchenyuk head butted a goal but still he is great at rebound control.
Toews started that play with another great recovery in his own zone.
that was BS on Quick. He's outside the crease, the player avoids him but he spears him anyway and then goes after Crawford, who's outplaying him.
We'll sick Kreider on his punk ass.
Again, I agree. Echelon was the wrong word. My point is that Crawford is not an elite goaltender. He often gets away with just making the save, rebounds be damned. It's a testament to the team in front of him, but look at the way Crawford played in Game 4, he guessed wrong on the initial shot so much, it did not matter. Not sure how Crawford fits in with the Blackhawks Cap situation, but it would appear they have made a good choice in making him their starter.
I actually was agreeing with you, I am not quoting you to argue, just the opposite.