TheTakedown
Puck is Life
- Jul 11, 2012
- 13,694
- 1,493
No idea why we thought Suzuki wasn't as good. Total botch jobWe selected Lias over Nick Suzuki lol Oh man that hurts.
No idea why we thought Suzuki wasn't as good. Total botch jobWe selected Lias over Nick Suzuki lol Oh man that hurts.
No idea why we thought Suzuki wasn't as good. Total botch job
And some people want us to trade down as opposed to drafting a sure thing. Ridiculous.No idea why we thought Suzuki wasn't as good. Total botch job
But also a team we beat every time this season.
But also a team we beat every time this season.
No idea why we thought Suzuki wasn't as good. Total botch job
I remember how people were criticizing the Kreider pick because we passed on Josefson and Schroeder. You win some, you lose some.
Tampa Bay, often touted as the best drafting team in the league, picked Slater Koekkoek and Brett Connolly in the top-10. Every team has misses. The bigger issue for us has always been the lack of top-6 contributors coming out of the day 2 picks.
Kreider was raw--was playing Prep School hockey--the level of competition very low. The size and the skating though. He was and is also very bright---though not necessarily hockey IQ bright--he had a lot of learning to do there. He's turned into a great character guy--goes out of his way to help young players and prospects. His draft year the other most physical forward would have been Zach Kassian. I wanted the Rangers to grab one or the other but Kassian was well too regarded for him to fall as far as us. Montreal picks right before us and takes a French Canadian kid playing for Harvard who busted. I remember being somewhat interested in Josefson (glad we didn't draft him) but Kyle Palmieri was really my fall back choice after Kreider and he turned out well.
Skjei really isn't a bad pick for where he was taken and considering his draft had tons of busts and lots of bottom liners and bottom pairing types. There are a few players taken after him that turned out better but not all that many. Those were mainly guys that until then hadn't blossomed all that much. That happens every draft--it's kind of the Henrik Lundqvist factor.
When it comes to late round picks (3rd and beyond) I always feel it's more development and luck rather than picking the right player. Of course that's also a factor, but I would say development is 50% of it.
Players that are drafted---there are always some elements to a game that are there--it's like sometimes just being drafted blossoms a player almost instantly. Lundqvist I think was one. Parayko might be another example. The Rangers have had their fair share of breaks just with our goaltending of Henrik and Igor. Ryan Callahan was a more minor miracle. Both Buchnevich and Duclair as 3rd rounders in the same draft year don't count so much as they certainly had the skill level where they should have been taken higher. Those two fell in our laps though I think we might have taken Tambellini before either or at least one of them. Lately Barron seems maybe the most like that---perhaps Pajuniemi. Reunanen dropped because of a bad injury. Zac Jones---but I think everyone was excited about him right off.
Stop making excuses for them. Carolina is good but not amazing. And even if they were the 2nd coming of the dynasty Habs that doesn’t excuse the Rangers performance.And the Red Wings beat the Canadiens 4 times. Ottawa last year won the reg season sereies against Tampa.
Head-to-head results in the regular season are meaningless. Sure, it looks nice as a pre-game graphic on TV but that's about it
It's not that they were just drafted, it's just age. You're drafting guys right in the most volatile period of their progress, both as hockey players and as people. I'm not sure that I land on being for this, completely, but it's why I'm intrigued by the idea of moving the draft age to 19 (the 2021 draft would be the perfect one to skip).
Stop making excuses for them. Carolina is good but not amazing. And even if they were the 2nd coming of the dynasty Habs that doesn’t excuse the Rangers performance.
Pittsburgh winning Lafreniere would enrage me to no end
Rangers lost to a better team. That's not "making excuses"
You’re excusing their no-show, no effort performance by chalking it up to facing a better team. I don’t care that they lost, it’s just how awful and uninterested they looked doing it.Rangers lost to a better team. That's not "making excuses"
Kevin Hayes looking like an All-Star today
Things like this just set teams back, missing on top 10 picks is a huge deal that isn't mentioned enough with this team. You get Suzuki and now your top 2 centers are Zibanejad and Suzuki for a very long time. Instead, our pick bails on us and now we need to trade assets for a 2c unless we resign Strome which i don't want to do.No idea why we thought Suzuki wasn't as good. Total botch job
Kevin Hayes looking like an All-Star today
Miller goes to Vancouver and becomes a 70 point player. Lol, whether he plays with Pettersson or not, he never showed thay potential with us. Typical Rangers luck.Classic Rangers keeping the worst of Kreider Hayes and Miller