Around The NHL: Part VIII - Tampa/NYR = 0 Playoff Wins

[Gresch04]

Why isn’t Matthews on the other circle for one timers???

 

[JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK]

the choker!!!!

 

[JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK]

Why isn’t Matthews on the other circle for one timers???

nice timing

 

[Gresch04]

nice timing

Just seemed obvious on the PP. Great pass by Muzzin on that one.

 

[Emptyvoid]

Nice, I'd like to see the leafs make the 2nd round at least. New blood, rebuilding and all

 

[Black Aces]

Milbury is a homer

 

[JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK]

thats not interference lol

it was called a goal

 

[Black Aces]

That is not enough contact in my opinion

 

[trilobyte]

Good for Matthews.
He has worked his butt off this game getting into all the dirty areas, backchecking like a madman.
Nice goal

Hmm...that was a fair bit of contact there though

 

[Irishguy42]

That should have been called back, but okay.

 

[The Crypto Guy]

Jesus millbury is such a homer. contact was made OUTSIDE the crease. Good goal.

 

[haohmaru]

I don't have a dog in the hunt but OF COURSE that's interference. Wow, it's such a crapshoot what's a goal and what isn't - of course they're calling these in TORONTO lol.

 

[Gresch04]

Hyman cross checked himself into the goalie. Interesting call. Probably bc Rask was outside blue paint. Milbury has Boston goggles.

 

[NewLife]

Imo it looks like the contact occurs outside the crease. Inconclusive ie the goal should stand.

 

[effen]

crystal clear interference lol
there is no sliding scale of enough or not enough when the opposing player is doing 100% of interfering action

 

[trilobyte]

Thought this one was going to go to OT.
Whether or not Rask would have got over is debatable but I really thought that was interference.

 

[haohmaru]

Jesus millbury is such a homer. contact was made OUTSIDE the crease. Good goal.

69.1: Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player's position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed.

 

[Emptyvoid]

Milbury is a homer

Homers are a big problem in all sports announcing.

I'd argue Milbury perpetuates the sort of low level bull shit that's so easy to spout. "They wanted it more", "not enough effort", etc.

Hockey is a complicated sport with a lot of randomness involved. How about you analyze the damn game and tell us what is it the opposition managed to do to result in a goal, a swing in momentum, etc.

 

[Gresch04]

Expecting a Boston PP soon.

 

[The Crypto Guy]

69.1: Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player's position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed.

That does not mean INCIDENTAL contact. That is talking about purposely or recklessly going into the goalie.

Incidental contact is also not allowed in the crease unless its because of a defending player.

 

[Leonardo87]

I don't have a dog in the hunt but OF COURSE that's interference. Wow, it's such a crapshoot what's a goal and what isn't - of course they're calling these in TORONTO lol.

There wasn’t much contact to make a strong case, plus believe Rask was outside the paint.

 

[haohmaru]

Homers are a big problem in all sports announcing.

I'd argue Milbury perpetuates the sort of low level bull **** that's so easy to spout. "They wanted it more", "not enough effort", etc.

Hockey is a complicated sport with a lot of randomness involved. How about you analyze the damn game and tell us what is it the opposition managed to do to result in a goal, a swing in momentum, etc.

I'm fine with Milbury. Well, as fine as I can be with Milbury, but he shouldn't be doing Boston and/or Islander games. I'd say the same about Micheletti doing NBC Ranger games.

 

[trilobyte]

Hyman lost his balance after he pushed out at the Bruin player. It was all him on that contact.

 

[haohmaru]

That does not mean INCIDENTAL contact. That is talking about purposely or recklessly going into the goalie

Wasn't incidental - he pushed off the Bruins player and propelled himself into the goalie - whether he knew where he was or not. Minor? Yes, but more than enough to throw Rask off.

 

[Emptyvoid]

I'm fine with Milbury. Well, as fine as I can be with Milbury, but he shouldn't be doing Boston and/or Islander games. I'd say the same about Micheletti doing NBC Ranger games.

I wouldn't disagree

 

[Gresch04]

69.1: Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player's position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed.

That just means being outside the crease is not a clean play automatically. It’s still a consideration.