GDT: - Around the NHL: Congrats to The Jerks on their SC win | Page 6 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

GDT: Around the NHL: Congrats to The Jerks on their SC win

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
Legitimately no one wants this.

My major issue with expansion is that you basically have to go from 32 teams to 36 teams to have it make sense. I think the current division setup makes both 32 and 36 make sense, but I don't really want another 4 expansion teams.

Houston makes a lot of sense as another team to add, but you'll need 3 more too. Atlanta is always talked about as an option and I think the NHL wants to go back to Phoenix with better owners. Quebec City is always talked about too but I don't think the market is there. I'd probably argue:

-Central: Houston/Austin
-West: Phoenix
-East: Atlanta or Quebec City

All make sense, but what team are you adding to the Metro there?
 
My major issue with expansion is that you basically have to go from 32 teams to 36 teams to have it make sense. I think the current division setup makes both 32 and 36 make sense, but I don't really want another 4 expansion teams.

Houston makes a lot of sense as another team to add, but you'll need 3 more too. Atlanta is always talked about as an option and I think the NHL wants to go back to Phoenix with better owners. Quebec City is always talked about too but I don't think the market is there. I'd probably argue:

-Central: Houston/Austin
-West: Phoenix
-East: Atlanta or Quebec City

All make sense, but what team are you adding to the Metro there?

From a divison balance standpoint, sure 36 makes more sense than 32.
But there is such a thing as hockey saturation/limitations where there aren't enough fans to support all the franchises. There is an inflection point where fans just stop caring as much and the money well runs dry. Where is that point, IDK but the NHL is in THE worst financial position compared to all other sports. Hell, you could make the argument that the WNBA could be gaining ground on them and overtake them in terms of popularity.

We're going to get this expansion and then, spoiler alert the owners will threaten a lockout. I've seen this all before (multiple times)
 
From a divison balance standpoint, sure 36 makes more sense than 32.
But there is such a thing as hockey saturation/limitations where there aren't enough fans to support all the franchises. There is an inflection point where fans just stop caring as much and the money well runs dry. Where is that point, IDK but the NHL is in THE worst financial position compared to all other sports. Hell, you could make the argument that the WNBA could be gaining ground on them and overtake them in terms of popularity.

We're going to get this expansion and then, spoiler alert the owners will threaten a lockout. I've seen this all before (multiple times)

How can you argue this is the case, though? The NHL is receiving such insane amounts of revenue that the cap is skyrocketing by like 20% in the next 2 years.
 
How can you argue this is the case, though? The NHL is receiving such insane amounts of revenue that the cap is skyrocketing by like 20% in the next 2 years.

I can argue this because it seems the NHL can't help itself where it has a lockout every decade in the modern TV era. This well is going to run dry.
Entertainment dollars are finite . The NHL is the most gate dependent sport of the major 4 sports
 
  • Like
Reactions: plaidchuck
My major issue with expansion is that you basically have to go from 32 teams to 36 teams to have it make sense. I think the current division setup makes both 32 and 36 make sense, but I don't really want another 4 expansion teams.

Houston makes a lot of sense as another team to add, but you'll need 3 more too. Atlanta is always talked about as an option and I think the NHL wants to go back to Phoenix with better owners. Quebec City is always talked about too but I don't think the market is there. I'd probably argue:

-Central: Houston/Austin
-West: Phoenix
-East: Atlanta or Quebec City

All make sense, but what team are you adding to the Metro there?

There's been noise in the past around Cincinnati , as well as Kansas City as we know all too well. Cincinnati would make sense geographically while KC would not but I wonder if they would move them to the Central and push Nashville to the Metro.

This is all, of course, assuming the league even gives a shit about geographical sense which they do not always seem to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randy Butternubs
Yep you can guarantee they will take another crack at Phoenix. Why would the league protect the franchise and turn Utah into an expansion otherwise? And if one of these expansion teams pays 500 million like Vegas did you can guarantee they’ll get another favorable draft as well.
 
As the number of teams has gone up, my overall interest in this joke of a league has gone down. And that’s not even taking into account all the other bullshit.

The on-ice product nowadays is trash 80% of the time but yeah let’s just add “moar teams” 🙄🙄🙄🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: plaidchuck
Put a team in Cleveland. They've got a nice arena.
They can call them the Barons. Or the LeBarons after the fine automobile. Or the LeBrons if LeBron buys a new NHL franchise for his almost hometown. Kind of keeping in the tradition of naming the local football team after its original owner.
 
IMG_8601.jpeg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad