Kat Predator
Registered User
- Nov 28, 2019
- 4,781
- 5,389
Well, it was nice of the Oilers to finally show up after going down 0-3. The Panthers are having trouble with stickhandling.
I’m Red Sox fan hearing that phrase makes me smileYou don't see reverse sweeps every day, that's for sure.
Never bet against the Perry jinx though.I can’t root for any of these teams they’re not the Preds. My standby is go meteor go but seeing a Ekholm in the cup would be nice. The big drawback would be Corey Perry winning the cup.
If only we get the Perry head down on the boards, FML lookNever bet against the Perry jinx though.
I don't care how many years he played us, he's a McDroiler. f*** him. Hope they lose game 7 in the most heartbreaking fashion and don't get close to another Cup chance.I can’t root for any of these teams they’re not the Preds. My standby is go meteor go but seeing a Ekholm in the cup would be nice. The big drawback would be Corey Perry winning the cup.
I for one would gladly take a McDavid or Draisaitl from the McDroilers.I don't care how many years he played us, he's a McDroiler. f*** him. Hope they lose game 7 in the most heartbreaking fashion and don't get close to another Cup chance.
All 2 of them?Ekholm winning a Cup would trump all else for me. I hope he gets it. Maybe he can show up at the country club for brunch one day this summer flashing his ring and light a fire under some of his buddies' butts.
I'll gladly take both. Saros, Tomasino, and a 1st?I for one would gladly take a McDavid or Draisaitl from the McDroilers.
To me that's less a reason to want the Oilers to win and more a small consolation.I can’t root for any of these teams they’re not the Preds. My standby is go meteor go but seeing a Ekholm in the cup would be nice. The big drawback would be Corey Perry winning the cup.
...and immediately replace it with even more silly and dangerous talk of "see, tanking works". And then I would have to stab everybody. And I don't want to have to stab everybody. There's just so many people nowadays. It'd be a lot of hard work.If nothing else McDavid getting a cup, especially in these circumstances would shut down a lot of the silly talk of "playoff choking" or whatever nonsense gets thrown around. Taking this flawed team to a Cup would be a legacy definer.
I mean, tanking can work. It's just that there are other ways to build a team too. Tanking is one of the riskier options. It's not a realistic option in Nashville anyway given the roster construction and arguably the market forces. Nor is it really necessary given the prospect pool....and immediately replace it with even more silly and dangerous talk of "see, tanking works". And then I would have to stab everybody. And I don't want to have to stab everybody. There's just so many people nowadays. It'd be a lot of hard work.
No, it can't. It literally never does. The only way it can be said to "work" is if you change your definition of what tanking is to make it seem somewhat more acceptable. But deliberately sabotaging your team never ends well.I mean, tanking can work.
I guess we'd have to define tanking. Accepting bad seasons as part of a rebuild seems to generally be defined as tanking these days. And it has worked for some teams. Some have found success without doing it. Others have ended up in the doldrums for a decade. Still others have found themselves stuck in the middle for long stretches.No, it can't. It literally never does. The only way it can be said to "work" is if you change your definition of what tanking is to make it seem somewhat more acceptable. But deliberately sabotaging your team never ends well.
For how random a game of hockey is, I find it silly how much individuals are belittled for the lack of team success.If nothing else McDavid getting a cup, especially in these circumstances would shut down a lot of the silly talk of "playoff choking" or whatever nonsense gets thrown around. Taking this flawed team to a Cup would be a legacy definer.
That's what I was referring to with a "revised definition". When the hardcore advocates get on it, what they mean is not just accepting bad seasons, but actively seeking ways to make seasons bad.I guess we'd have to define tanking. Accepting bad seasons as part of a rebuild seems to generally be defined as tanking these days.
I think it would be worth the effort. I'm sure you wouldn't get to everybody anyhow. But start off in the right place, hopefully you'll get to a good number before they take you down?...and immediately replace it with even more silly and dangerous talk of "see, tanking works". And then I would have to stab everybody. And I don't want to have to stab everybody. There's just so many people nowadays. It'd be a lot of hard work.