Around the NHL 2024/25

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Okay, this was what I was wanting to post before I hit the Post button too early

On the Friday episode of The Fan Hockey Show on Sportsnet with Matt Marchese and Mike Futa there was a discussion of which was the correct way to hold your stick on the bench; knob up or blade up, and a bunch of current and former hockey players responded directly to them. This is only tally of players that actually responded. I found it an interesting topic, just a quirky little thing within the game to have fun with. I believe I was a Knobs up guy, no reason behind.. it just happened that way.

How did you hold your stick on the bench and did you ever notice if the team you were on was mostly Knobs or Blades up?

These are the names the recited for each team, so I made it into a table for easy reference.

Vq5AMNt.png


The link to watch this part of the episode. It's pretty interesting. There's some feed back from the players on why they held their stick that way.
Sportsnet - The FAN Hockey Show: Jan. 24 - Canucks Crumble
 
Last edited:
Okay, this was what I was wanting to post before I hit the Post button too early

On the Friday episode of The Fan Hockey Show on Sportsnet with Matt Marchese and Mike Futa there was a discussion of which was the correct way to hold your stick on the bench; knob up or blade up, and a bunch of current and former hockey players responded directly to them. This is only tally of players that actually responded. I found it an interesting topic, just a quirky little thing within the game to have fun with. I believe I was a Knobs up guy, no reason behind.. it just happened that way.

How did you hold your stick on the bench and did you ever notice if the team you were on was mostly Knobs or Blades up?

Vq5AMNt.png


The link to watch this part of the episode. It's pretty interesting. There's some feed back from the players on why they held their stick that way.
Sportsnet - The FAN Hockey Show: Jan. 24 - Canucks Crumble
For Kypreos is was face down
 
Just saw that Rantanen was asking for 14M per year in Colorado

Trade is making a little more sense now
I heard Friedman talking about how the big rise in the Salary Cap projected was going to affect teams that don't think they have the revenues to spend to $95-100 million. Colorado he hinted might be one of those teams. I wonder if there is a number that Chipman has as a ceiling. Also if Rantanen gets $14 million on the market, I don't think it's inconceivable that Ehlers might look at $11-$12 million as the next guy on the totem pole. Colorado desperately needed to get 3 centers going with Middlestadt struggling, so I think that was part of the trade, where Drury was a need for the team. And Necas is at least a talent that can somewhat offset losing Rantanen. This is kind of the Avs making up some draft capital they lost last year by having to get Johansen out of town, imo.

NYR have gone 7-0-3 in their last 10 and are only 3 points out of a wildcard spot

Someone must have put the dumpster fire out lol
Probably starts in net. I've watched a few highlights of the Rangers lately and they split up Kreider and Zibanajed and it seems to be working. Also putting guys on trade alert to Vancouver seems to have lit a fire under them. I guess getting traded to Vancouver right now would have that effect.

Kakko has got a lot of attention since being traded, but the Rags just re-signed Borgen, who replaced Trouba with K'Andre Miller, so they must be happy with that exchange, Two trades that have reconstructed their defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog
I heard Friedman talking about how the big rise in the Salary Cap projected was going to affect teams that don't think they have the revenues to spend to $95-100 million. Colorado he hinted might be one of those teams. I wonder if there is a number that Chipman has as a ceiling. Also if Rantanen gets $14 million on the market, I don't think it's inconceivable that Ehlers might look at $11-$12 million as the next guy on the totem pole. Colorado desperately needed to get 3 centers going with Middlestadt struggling, so I think that was part of the trade, where Drury was a need for the team. And Necas is at least a talent that can somewhat offset losing Rantanen. This is kind of the Avs making up some draft capital they lost last year by having to get Johansen out of town, imo.


Probably starts in net. I've watched a few highlights of the Rangers lately and they split up Kreider and Zibanajed and it seems to be working. Also putting guys on trade alert to Vancouver seems to have lit a fire under them. I guess getting traded to Vancouver right now would have that effect.

Kakko has got a lot of attention since being traded, but the Rags just re-signed Borgen, who replaced Trouba with K'Andre Miller, so they must be happy with that exchange, Two trades that have reconstructed their defense.
Is drury more than 4th line though? Think i would have just paid rantanen, hed be a key part of your team for 8 years... im sure he will sign for 11-12 in the end... this stuff is always exagerrated
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jets 31
Is drury more than 4th line though? Think i would have just paid rantanen, hed be a key part of your team for 8 years... im sure he will sign for 11-12 in the end... this stuff is always exagerrated
4th line in Carolina, who have one of the best checking lines in the league with Staal and Jarvis. 3rd line in Colorado, replacing Parker Kelly, who has been an injury fill in since Miles Wood went down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobTheSolarsystem

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad