Around the NHL 2024/25

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,958
31,476
Reaves gets 5 games and Scheifele gets 4 playoff games and was a first offense, seems totally fair.:huh:

Appearances.

A hit like that one should get the max, even for a 1st offense. OK, max -1 for a 1st offender.

If the NHL/NHLPA want to get serious about player safety they need to bring in a lifetime suspension - and use it. Repeat offender status would not reset after some short time without an offence. I forget the time on that but it is way too short.
 

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,200
31,540
You want someone to go to the Leafs dressing room to fight Reaves?

Or just any random Oiler fight any random Leaf? To what end?
or you know I don't want every clean hit to end in a fight and I find it funny that the one time there was a dirty hit it led to nothing...
 

Jets 31

This Dude loves the Jets and GIF's
Sponsor
Mar 3, 2015
23,218
66,836
Winnipeg
Appearances.

A hit like that one should get the max, even for a 1st offense. OK, max -1 for a 1st offender.

If the NHL/NHLPA want to get serious about player safety they need to bring in a lifetime suspension - and use it. Repeat offender status would not reset after some short time without an offence. I forget the time on that but it is way too short.
4 playoff games was too much though, if that's regular season fine but 4 playoff games is huge.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,958
31,476
or you know I don't want every clean hit to end in a fight and I find it funny that the one time there was a dirty hit it led to nothing...

I got that. I just don't quite get what you expected when the guy who needs to have his helmet punched is gone for the night.

Clean hits shouldn't need to lead to fights. There are some that are just barely legal that still aren't quite what I would call 'clean' that maybe should lead to fights. Especially those that seem to target smaller players or more skilled players.

I really hate seeing hits like that Reaves on Nurse one. Huge strong man at very high speed hitting someone like that. Players keep getting bigger and faster. Some day someone is going to get killed. As it is a lot of former players seem to die 20 years early with CTE symptoms.
 

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,200
31,540
I got that. I just don't quite get what you expected when the guy who needs to have his helmet punched is gone for the night.

Clean hits shouldn't need to lead to fights. There are some that are just barely legal that still aren't quite what I would call 'clean' that maybe should lead to fights. Especially those that seem to target smaller players or more skilled players.

I really hate seeing hits like that Reaves on Nurse one. Huge strong man at very high speed hitting someone like that. Players keep getting bigger and faster. Some day someone is going to get killed. As it is a lot of former players seem to die 20 years early with CTE symptoms.
I expected nothing, just found it funny that clean hits = fight and an actual dirty hit got nothing, I think you are reading way to much into the comment...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,958
31,476
4 playoff games was too much though, if that's regular season fine but 4 playoff games is huge.

Agree. That's why I said appearances. I thought the rule of thumb was 1 PO game = 2 regular season games. So it was = 8 games.

But there are 2 distinct interpretations of that Scheifele hit. It all depends on which one you choose to believe. Both have arguments in their favour.

Given Scheifele's otherwise clean record and his genuine reaction to the call I lean toward his side of the debate. But I can certainly see the other side. That said, the simple ambiguity of the play should have lead to a lighter penalty.

I expected nothing, just found it funny that clean hits = fight and an actual dirty hit got nothing, I think you are reading way to much into the comment...

OK, I get that.
 

DeepFrickinValue

Formally Ruffus
May 14, 2015
5,514
4,579
Appearances.

A hit like that one should get the max, even for a 1st offense. OK, max -1 for a 1st offender.

If the NHL/NHLPA want to get serious about player safety they need to bring in a lifetime suspension - and use it. Repeat offender status would not reset after some short time without an offence. I forget the time on that but it is way too short.
Need suspensions to be some ratio of time lost to injury. 2x length of injury or some.
 

nobody imp0rtant

Registered pessimist
May 23, 2018
10,949
18,296
Do you really want to watch a game where the go-to option to defend is to flip the puck out of play?

Not only would it make a power play worthless but the rest of the game would be too boring to watch.
Was it ever really that big a problem that they had to turn it into a penalty? Sure, the odd intentional flip out happened. But when you're in the typical underlying situation of being under heavy pressure in your own zone, flipping the puck over the glass isn't a gimme. You run the risk of an unknown bounce off the glass that could be to your detriment instead of looking for safer clearing attempts.

No, it does not deserve a penalty. Treat it like icing so the defending team can't make a change. That's sufficient.
 

nobody imp0rtant

Registered pessimist
May 23, 2018
10,949
18,296
4 playoff games was too much though, if that's regular season fine but 4 playoff games is huge.
It was only 3 playoff games. His teammates saw to that by getting swept by the Mighty Habs during the Asterisk Season.
Agree. That's why I said appearances. I thought the rule of thumb was 1 PO game = 2 regular season games. So it was = 8 games.

But there are 2 distinct interpretations of that Scheifele hit. It all depends on which one you choose to believe. Both have arguments in their favour.

Given Scheifele's otherwise clean record and his genuine reaction to the call I lean toward his side of the debate. But I can certainly see the other side. That said, the simple ambiguity of the play should have lead to a lighter penalty.



OK, I get that.
I'm sorry...his genuine reaction? You mean the look of slack jawed incredulity followed by the bitching and moaning that follows every penalty called on him? Sorry, that dog don't hunt for me. I suppose I should recuse myself from any discussions of 55 since I freely admit that he is my most loathed player on the team. But where would be the fun in that. :laugh:
 

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
10,758
16,696
It was only 3 playoff games. His teammates saw to that by getting swept by the Mighty Habs during the Asterisk Season.

I'm sorry...his genuine reaction? You mean the look of slack jawed incredulity followed by the bitching and moaning that follows every penalty called on him? Sorry, that dog don't hunt for me. I suppose I should recuse myself from any discussions of 55 since I freely admit that he is my most loathed player on the team. But where would be the fun in that. :laugh:
On the bright side we were winning when there was a healthy scheif/top line advanced stats argument raging.... then the boobs showed up

Edit: mmmmmm... boobies
 
  • Haha
Reactions: voyageur

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,463
9,833
On the bright side we were winning when there was a healthy scheif/top line advanced stats argument raging.... then the boobs showed up

Edit: mmmmmm... boobies
Well they get your attention and capture your imagination. Some advanced stats are just veiled opinions, can be ignored. Fit into the AI discussion too...
 

Attachments

  • is-ai-the-future-v0-s7e36ew36mbd1.jpeg
    is-ai-the-future-v0-s7e36ew36mbd1.jpeg
    124.5 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:

Shlep

Registered User
Sep 13, 2024
210
519
I don't buy this you have to have a face puncher in the lineup, you need team toughness something the Jets lack. As for Reaves he is on the ice to hurt players and that's what he does and the league condones it.
In the brief moment that a player has the opportunity to make a dirty play, do you honestly think that the idea of grappling with Ryan Reaves for a few seconds before falling to the ice is scary enough to stop them from making that play?
 

cbcwpg

Registered User
May 18, 2010
20,578
21,853
Between the Pipes
From the DOPS:

As the video shows, Nurse gathers the puck behind the net and skates up ice as Reaves pursues from the netfront on the forecheck. Reaves closes in on Nurse as he rounds the net, and delivers a high, hard check that cuts across the front of Nurse’s body, missing his core and hitting his head, making it the main point of contact on a hit where such head contact was avoidable. This is an illegal check to the head.
It is important to note that both elements of the illegal check to the head rule are satisfied on this play. First, the head is clearly the main point of contact, as Reaves’ shoulder makes direct, and forceful contact with Nurse’s head, and it is the head that absorbs the vast majority of the force. Second, the head contact on this check is avoidable. Reaves mistimes this play, choosing an angle of approach that cuts across the front of Nurse, missing his core and making his head the main point of contact. And while we understand Nurse is in the process of playing the puck, he does not materially change the position of his head, or body, just prior to contact in a way that contributes to the head being the main point of contact. If Reaves wants to deliver this check, he must take an angle of approach that hits through Nurse’s shoulder and core, rather than one that picks the head, making it the main point of contact.
To summarize: this is an illegal check to the head. Nurse suffered an injury on the play. Reaves has been suspended three times and fined twice during his 893-game NHL career. The department of player safety has suspended Ryan Reaves for five-games.”

**

In reality though....Does giving a guy a 5 game suspension, when no one will even notice or care that he's not in the lineup for the next 5 games, even serve as a deterrent?
 

Jets 31

This Dude loves the Jets and GIF's
Sponsor
Mar 3, 2015
23,218
66,836
Winnipeg
From the DOPS:

As the video shows, Nurse gathers the puck behind the net and skates up ice as Reaves pursues from the netfront on the forecheck. Reaves closes in on Nurse as he rounds the net, and delivers a high, hard check that cuts across the front of Nurse’s body, missing his core and hitting his head, making it the main point of contact on a hit where such head contact was avoidable. This is an illegal check to the head.
It is important to note that both elements of the illegal check to the head rule are satisfied on this play. First, the head is clearly the main point of contact, as Reaves’ shoulder makes direct, and forceful contact with Nurse’s head, and it is the head that absorbs the vast majority of the force. Second, the head contact on this check is avoidable. Reaves mistimes this play, choosing an angle of approach that cuts across the front of Nurse, missing his core and making his head the main point of contact. And while we understand Nurse is in the process of playing the puck, he does not materially change the position of his head, or body, just prior to contact in a way that contributes to the head being the main point of contact. If Reaves wants to deliver this check, he must take an angle of approach that hits through Nurse’s shoulder and core, rather than one that picks the head, making it the main point of contact.
To summarize: this is an illegal check to the head. Nurse suffered an injury on the play. Reaves has been suspended three times and fined twice during his 893-game NHL career. The department of player safety has suspended Ryan Reaves for five-games.”

**

In reality though....Does giving a guy a 5 game suspension, when no one will even notice or care that he's not in the lineup for the next 5 games, even serve as a deterrent?
No not with a player like Reaves , they won't even miss him.
 

sipowicz

The thrill is gone
Mar 16, 2011
32,265
43,257
On the upside, Sportsnet has a nice article about how Reaves suspension is too harsh...
The same clowns on HNIC who don't think hitting should be allowed if one team is ahead in goals!

Had a Leaf player made the same play and hit they would be talking about how it was such a great throwback hit and how great Pionk was for doing it, total double standard from our so-called national Toronto /Ontario centric sports networks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jetfaninflorida

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $613.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $150.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $52,170.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $150.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $155.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad