- Mar 10, 2010
- 35,588
- 34,018
There's basically 2 types of value in an investment. One being "cash flow" - can it pay it's bills in a fiscal year, and also make profit. The other is "long term asset appreciation".
I really don't think owners buy initially to make money by way of cash flow, as the cost to get in , is just too high. If they can that's great, and some older more established clubs do.
The money is made "long term " like a real estate investment. Example Chipman buys the Jets for $ 160 million, and could likely sell the Jets for at least $ 2 billion. I think Seattle paid close to $ 3 billion, but it may have been $ 2 bil.
So say Chipman sold the Jets for $ 2 billion, less his cost of 160 mill, then his profit would be ( $ 2 bil - $ 160 mil ) = $ 1.84 billion dollars,
less some bad years on the operating side. Now you see where the money is made = "long term." and it's very big money $$$
The Key is you have to have the pockets to carry the team thru bad operating years, where you lost money on the operating side. A good example would be Zeto, owner of the Florida Panthers. He has very very deep pockets, and can play with 1/2 empty arenas, ( and did) whereas a guy like Chipman, cannot afford that.
A few things to add. Yes there are proper business fundamentals to explain the current approximate valuations of Pro Sport franchises but I am going to avoid that rabbit hole for this post.
As @cbcwpg mentioned I would say one primary driver of owning a sport property is ego and I would like to build on that point.
I think one of the major factors in the explosion of sport property valuations is the growth of the Billionaire class (Adding more egos to the buy side). Back in 2011 when Dallas and Atlanta sold there were under 20 Billionaires in Canada (est) and 412 Billionaires in the US. Fast forward to 2024 and there are between 56-67 Billionaires in Canada (from two reports I saw) and 748 Billionaires in the US (Statista) and the category appears to be growing in North America by about 25 new Billionaires per year.
The demand side of the number of possible buyers (egos) is growing much faster than the supply side of professional sport franchises in the North America. I think that is impacting pro sport valuations and helping enrich the multiples that the brands/properties are fetching.
Last edited: