Around the NHL 11 - 2023/24

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Leafs loss rings hollow. At least they fought it back to game 7, which is a lot more than we can say.

I'll be watching game 7 Dallas Vegas to hopefully see those cheating f***ers knocked out.

After that, the seasons over for me, I won't watch another second.
 
The Leafs loss rings hollow. At least they fought it back to game 7, which is a lot more than we can say.

I'll be watching game 7 Dallas Vegas to hopefully see those cheating f***ers knocked out.

After that, the seasons over for me, I won't watch another second.

Agree. Thought they played with a ton of heart despite the injuries to some key players, and played exactly the kind of tight-checking committed hockey we were hoping for from our Jennings-winning Jets.

Also, I hate the Bruins. And that OT goal looked like a set play for sure.

Oh well. Go Stars!
 
The Leafs loss rings hollow. At least they fought it back to game 7, which is a lot more than we can say.

I'll be watching game 7 Dallas Vegas to hopefully see those cheating f***ers knocked out.

After that, the seasons over for me, I won't watch another second.
Same boat for me. I haven't watched a game since our boys got knocked out but will watch f@#$ Vegas get shit canned.
 
That was a dump in play, Nylander isn't supposed to back check. It took a home ice bounce off the corner, I wouldn't be surprised if Boston knew that would happen. Home ice advantage.
Thats the narrative over at HF Leafs too.

Maybe I don't know much about hockey, but when Marner lets Pasta zoom by him, you've got a threat in deep. Sure it didn't help that the D coasted on that one - the combination of that pooched it.
 
Last edited:
Question for all and sundry:

When the Leaf forward was tripped on the break on the stretch pass in the third period and crashed into the Boston goalie, why wasn't a trip called?

I was watching this in a pub in Calgary with one of my kids (lots of fun too) and about half of the room exploded with angst.

Table-pounding, beer flying, non-hockey-types shocked looking angst. (Hard to believe there are so many Toronto fans in Calgary).
 
Rielly, Marner, and Tavares all had horrible series. Matthews did alright but definitely didn’t earn his regular season paycheque (again). Nylander is probably their best playoff performer.
 
Of course you are right but they have to blame someone for Reilly being such a shitty defenseman, also Marner has no awareness on the play


The only think you could blame Marner for is not realizing earlier that Reilly was f***ing up and he was going to have to cover for him. F1 is not supposed to be first on the puck in the corner on a dump in in any D zone scheme I've ever seen
 
The only think you could blame Marner for is not realizing earlier that Reilly was f***ing up and he was going to have to cover for him. F1 is not supposed to be first on the puck in the corner on a dump in in any D zone scheme I've ever seen
At least get a stick on he had no idea what was going on and by the time he realized Pasta was by him it was in the net
 
  • Like
Reactions: kanadalainen
Thats the narrative over at HF Leafs too.

Maybe I don't know much about hockey, but when Marner lets Pasta zoom by him, you've got a threat in deep. Sure it didn't help that the D coasted on that one - the combination of that pooched it.

I don't know how anyone can look at that and think it wasn't. Pasta knew exactly where to go. Marner is not supposed to be covering the guy who is supposedly going to forecheck a dump in play.

Or teams with goalies who can make big saves in the playoffs and not say they played well after going .870 through 5 games!

Yeah the Jets were definitely playing like a team who'd win that series in 5 except for some shaky goaltending.
 
Hey there hockey experts/faculty:

When the Leaf forward was tripped on the break on the stretch pass in the third period and crashed into the Boston goalie, why wasn't a trip called?

Serious question - I was watching this in a pub in Calgary with one of my kids (lots of fun too) and about half of the room exploded with angst.
It used to be that when the primary contact was the puck, the trip was negated (but I think they changed that at the NHL level - it may still be in place in Hockey Canada rulebook)

Just an example of playoff officiating I guess. Since the puck was already gone, the trip didn't result in a change of possession or loss of scoring chance so let it go
 
  • Like
Reactions: kanadalainen
I don't know how anyone can look at that and think it wasn't. Pasta knew exactly where to go. Marner is not supposed to be covering the guy who is supposedly going to forecheck a dump in play.
Lets assume its a set play then, I'll give you that. But really, Pastrnak was by himself, with lots of time to deke.. seems odd - and if I was a Leafs fan I'd be angry that he was let go.

Some are calling that a cheat with improperly built stanchions along the boards. If it is a cheat, then its an all world execution.
 
Last edited:
F1 is not supposed to be first on the puck in the corner on a dump in in any D zone scheme I've ever seen
Ok, thats fair, but to let the guy gain the zone clean, so clean that its essentially on a break out... seems like a fail.

Context is game 7, overtime.

To Marner:

26f3ff09-5ee0-46b5-a5f4-168fd0c46324_text.gif


Boston could not not replicate that play 9 times out of 10, last night it worked perfectly with a lot of help
This makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bustamente
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad