Around the NHL — Episode XLXVII

CDN24

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
3,704
3,142
What a complete A-hole.. With a list of bad decisions that extend from the time he was made GM to the time he was let go... Accelerating the rebuild is what he choses to try to defend himself with. No mention of the back to back to back wasted 1st round picks plus the one they have to forfeit.

He is also quite wrong with respect to accelerating the rebuild- as per usual. The Monahan trade did not accelerate Habs rebuild, they made the trade in Summer 2022, the pick from Calgary has not even been made yet - it will be a 2025 pick probably late 1st round as it will likely be the FLA pick, realistically won't be in the lineup until 2027 (a full 5 years after the trade) at the earliest. The pick they got for Monahan from Winnipeg became Hage who just started his NCAA career and is like at least 2-3 years from making an impact. Unless Dorion is saying the habs should have pulled a Pierre and traded that Calgary pick for some guy on an expiring contract with no assurances he would resign, there was not much accelerating the rebuild in that Monahan trade.

Don't get me wrong, there was certainly value in that Monahan trade. Pierre had money though in the same summer he traded a 1st (7OA), a 2nd(39th OA) and a 3rd to get Debrincat who was making more money than Monahan. He too could have kept his 3 picks and then used that $$ on acquiring Monahan and getting another 1st.

Pierre has no one but himself to blame for his mistakes.
 

BonHoonLayneCornell

Registered User
Oct 16, 2006
16,509
11,624
Yukon
He is also quite wrong with respect to accelerating the rebuild- as per usual. The Monahan trade did not accelerate Habs rebuild, they made the trade in Summer 2022, the pick from Calgary has not even been made yet - it will be a 2025 pick probably late 1st round as it will likely be the FLA pick, realistically won't be in the lineup until 2027 (a full 5 years after the trade) at the earliest. The pick they got for Monahan from Winnipeg became Hage who just started his NCAA career and is like at least 2-3 years from making an impact. Unless Dorion is saying the habs should have pulled a Pierre and traded that Calgary pick for some guy on an expiring contract with no assurances he would resign, there was not much accelerating the rebuild in that Monahan trade.

Don't get me wrong, there was certainly value in that Monahan trade. Pierre had money though in the same summer he traded a 1st (7OA), a 2nd(39th OA) and a 3rd to get Debrincat who was making more money than Monahan. He too could have kept his 3 picks and then used that $$ on acquiring Monahan and getting another 1st.

Pierre has no one but himself to blame for his mistakes.
He is doing himself a disservice if he's now trying to defend his poor choices. Just let it lie and move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDN24

DylanSensFan

BEESHIP: NBH
Aug 3, 2010
9,658
1,907
Calgary
I was never a Dorion fan. I did not like him when he was appointed and really disliked him when he traded Zibanejad. Then it got worse and worse over time.
The only time I was a fan, was when we had the Summer of Pierre. But then that went to shit and I was waiting for him to be fired by Melnyk. Thankfully we got a new owner who cleaned house.

I am still angry about Zibanejad to this day. I think we have a balanced line up moving forward. We do need to stock the draft cupboards though.

What rules did they cheat?
Utilizing IR to get under the cap, to bring in players at the deadline. Shirking contracts, such as the case with Lehner.
 

BonHoonLayneCornell

Registered User
Oct 16, 2006
16,509
11,624
Yukon
Just let him Lie and keep burying himself. I can't stand him.
There is at least an entertainment factor if he chooses to try to go there on his own, but imo he should just accept his Mike Milbury like disaster legacy and move on to something else. He has little to no credibility at this point imo.
 

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,597
15,023
Utilizing IR to get under the cap, to bring in players at the deadline. Shirking contracts, such as the case with Lehner.

All within the rules.

For all the talk about IR shenanigans helping them win a cup, the only players they added because Stone went on LTIR were Teddy Blueger and Jonathan Quick, neither of whom made a lick of a difference in the playoffs.

Last year Stone going on LTIR allowed them to add Hertl, who himself was on LTIR until the last 6 games of the season, as he actually came back earlier than expected from his knee surgery. If he hadn't come back early that argument also falls apart.

And of course this is assuming that Stone wasn't actually experiencing back issues when he went on LTIR, which there's no proof for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DylanSensFan

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,597
15,023
What a complete A-hole.. With a list of bad decisions that extend from the time he was made GM to the time he was let go... Accelerating the rebuild is what he choses to try to defend himself with. No mention of the back to back to back wasted 1st round picks plus the one they have to forfeit.


He's such a smug shameless little weasel.

One of the worst GMs in this league's history.

If he was smart he'd shut his mouth and hope as time passes that people forget about what how damaging his tenure was to this franchise, but he's too stupid or vapid to realize that.
 

DylanSensFan

BEESHIP: NBH
Aug 3, 2010
9,658
1,907
Calgary
All within the rules.

For all the talk about IR shenanigans helping them win a cup, the only players they added because Stone went on LTIR were Teddy Blueger and Jonathan Quick, neither of whom made a lick of a difference in the playoffs.

Last year Stone going on LTIR allowed them to add Hertl, who himself was on LTIR until the last 6 games of the season, as he actually came back earlier than expected from his knee surgery. If he hadn't come back early that argument also falls apart.

And of course this is assuming that Stone wasn't actually experiencing back issues when he went on LTIR, which there's no proof for.
alright alright alright.

 

Loach

Registered User
Jun 9, 2021
3,147
2,134


Yes. Overhype an unrelenting and crazy fan base. Perfect. They can eat thenselves.
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,520
10,728
So Woll is injured so the leafs called up Hildeby. They don’t have cap space, how is this legal ?
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
66,766
52,203
All I know is Anaheim didn’t qualify him and had him on a PTO this year.
they sound kind of similar. You'd have to really know the player to make a switch like that. Seems like he stalled in Detroit and ran out of room in Anaheim
 

Tragedy

Registered User
Jan 10, 2013
1,408
896
Regina, SK
That's not cheating rules. Every team utilizes IR. I'm not sure about how the Lehner contract was resolved but the NHL seemed to have no issue with it and it did not seem to break any rules.
Lehner couldn't show up to camp because he's on the lam from his creditors. Vegas has every legal right to terminate his contract because of that - this was a settlement that gives Vegas the cap relief they are entitled to with Lehner breaching contract and gives Lehner some money he has no entitlement to to keep the PA happy.
 

BankStreetParade

Registered User
Jan 22, 2013
6,935
4,329
Ottawa
Andlauer himself has said that he has recieved a 73 page document that showed that the Sens were "downright negligent" in nature to the Dadonov trade.

Vegas bears 0 responsibility regarding Dadonov. They were told straight up on a trade call with the NHL and Dorion that he never submitted his trade clause and it was thus null and void. Once that happens, it's on the party who made that blunder, which is the Sens.
One thing that always bothered me about the punishment was that we only ever got information that Dorion acted alone. It's a hefty fine due the actions of 1 person. Would have made more sense to fine/punish Dorion directly as it holds him solely responsible.

Now, if there's some information in the report that multiple people knew about the mistake and didn't act to resolve it, I can understand the punishment being that substantial because it indicates a level of carelessness that's pervasive throughout the organization. However, there have been no rumours or any additional fallout that points in that direction so the penalty seems extremely excessive.

It's like if a player punched out a referee and the NHL fined the organization in addition to suspending the player. Why does the organization bear responsibility for the actions of 1 person?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad