Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 56,699
- 34,499
Nah, I'm just calling you out on your lazy takes. You've yet to do anything to justify why you think Clb had solid drafting, because you refuse to do the necessary work. Until you can do that, you're blowing smoke, and nothing more.OHH MY GOD.. you are engaging in a debate of which loser is the worst loser!!!!!
Both teams are garbage.
Columbus went through a good 8 years 2006-2014 where their draft was good and it resulted in the 17-20 period. Then they stank at the draft again, and the team has since collapsed.
Ottawa had 3 good years 9, 10 and 11. And it showed in the 2017 ECF run.
They then went into the toilette 12-19 and we see the 18-present mess.
Both teams are nearly identical. As is Buffalo, as are the Habs, Wings, Cayotes/UTAH HC, SJ, Anaheim, Chicago.
Which of these bottom 7-8 teams is the worst loser??? Common.
Idiot owners, who failed to properly monitor. Idiot POHOs who failed to monitor. Idiot Media who failed to monitor (although in Media's case, it is hard to do your job when you can easily be spanked).
2014 Columbus takes Sonny Milano. I love that name.. "it's not personal Sonny, It's Business" (see if you can figure out where that line comes from). Look at the next 6-8 guys. Rock solid. Even Tony D'Angelo (When his head is screwed on right)
2015 Ottawa takes White (their 2nd first). Now look at the 5-6 after him.
That is it.. It is that simple. When you are one of the leagues 10-12 underprivileged franchise. You need to minimize the Sonny Milano's, the Collin White's. And increase the "see any of the 4-6 names after them".
April 20th of every year would be my "sit and explain date". My POHO, my GM, and the entire network, would be in a board room at the CTC. 3 and 4 year earlier drafts would be analyzed. The IT man would be sitting at his desk, with an HR person next to him. Waiting for me to text a name. He would then cut off all accesses and credentials, etc. The HR person would finish the paper work. Everyone at that meeting had better hope, I don't text a name(s).
And before you jump a mile high. Yes, there would be fantastic latitude for "hey failure occurs". What there would not be latitude for? "3 straight years of failures occurring"
You should know better, but instead you've started with your conclusion that good drafting leads to success, and then decided a team drafted well because they followed up with some success. It's a circular argument without evidence until you actually look at the numbers, but every time you are presented with factual numbers, you dismiss them