Around the League Thread part V

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bandit

Registered User
Jul 23, 2005
33,067
23,402
Unemployed in Greenland


tumblr_mxywwnWn231s9ab4to1_400.gif

I don’t think I can take hearing about another Connor for eternity.

Also always nice to open the around the league thread and see pages of arguing about the 2012-2014 Kings. 😂
 

SmytheKing

Registered User
Apr 7, 2007
971
1,408
The Sekera trade made perfect sense though. They were a quality defenseman short and Sekera fit the Kings style of play like a glove. Every single one of else felt that they were going to contend again if they got in, but Sekera got hurt early and the team couldn't get over. It was worth that shot.
Big disagree on this part. This trade was done because of two good weeks. They went on a 9 game unbeaten streak right before the deadline. Prior to that I think they were 14th in the Conference and like the 3rd worst team in the NHL. The cracks were showing BIG TIME and that winning streak came at an awful time. They should have unloaded Stoll and Williams and taken a few 1sts in return. It was the 2nd worst choice (after the Lucic one) and back to backs like that are devastating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ricardfromage

bland

Registered User
Jul 1, 2004
7,959
12,189
Big disagree on this part. This trade was done because of two good weeks. They went on a 9 game unbeaten streak right before the deadline. Prior to that I think they were 14th in the Conference and like the 3rd worst team in the NHL. The cracks were showing BIG TIME and that winning streak came at an awful time. They should have unloaded Stoll and Williams and taken a few 1sts in return. It was the 2nd worst choice (after the Lucic one) and back to backs like that are devastating.
You don't think they deserved one more kick at that can after three consecutive Western Conference Finals? Completely agree the cracks were there, but I had no problem giving the duct tape a shot before calling it over.

But they failed on that shot, and with the Richards/Voynov/Sutter & Carcillo stuff, it was time to pump the breaks and look at the map instead of gunning it again.

If you take a look at those Cup winning rosters and see how little they got in return for any of those departed players, its astonishing that they thought they could still be competitive.
 

Axl Rhoadz

Binky distributor
Apr 5, 2011
4,942
3,808
Big disagree on this part. This trade was done because of two good weeks. They went on a 9 game unbeaten streak right before the deadline. Prior to that I think they were 14th in the Conference and like the 3rd worst team in the NHL. The cracks were showing BIG TIME and that winning streak came at an awful time. They should have unloaded Stoll and Williams and taken a few 1sts in return. It was the 2nd worst choice (after the Lucic one) and back to backs like that are devastating.
All in favor for a thread titled ‘Woulda, Shoulda, Coulda!’?
 

Herby

How could Blake have known?
Feb 27, 2002
26,804
17,035
Great Lakes Area
They should have made the playoffs had they had any kind of luck. But they probably wouldn’t have done much. They had played 64 playoff games the previous 3 years, including 26 the year before. The notion that they could have just flipped a switch was kind of debunked the final trip to western Canada where they were up against the wall and couldn’t flip a switch to beat a bad team. Had they gotten in they probably lose in the 1st round like Chicago did in 2016, just to many games for both teams.

I see both sides to Sekera, I think in the heat of the moment DL probably believed the hype of flipping a switch and believed Sekera could replace Voynov. But that team had a lot of holes and was dead tired too. That might have been a time to play a longer game and recoup some assets they had lost in other deals for some of the older guys who weren’t coming back. It’s just tough to make a move for the most expensive rental on the market when a 1st is involved, your pipeline is bare and you are on the outside looking in.

Instead it was a 1st gone in this deal (which fortunately was a 2016 1st since they missed) but in the end all that did was give them back a 2015 first which was used in one of the worst trades in team history.

I think Dean was just to blinded to see what was right in front of him between June 2014 and April 2017.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Choralone

crassbonanza

Fire Luc
Sep 28, 2017
3,296
3,194
I think Dean was just to blinded to see what was right in front of him between June 2014 and April 2017.

If you look at the analytics, it is very easy to see why he would have been blinded. The Kings led the entire league in xGF% from 2014-15 through 2016-17 at 54.25%. Second place was the Penguins at 53.36% and they won back to back cups over that stretch. I can totally see Lombardi, who was a very early adopter of analytics, looking at numbers like those and still thinking the Kings were on the cusp. I don't think his moves were the right ones, but I can understand him being blinded, especially coming off those magical 3 seasons reaching the conference finals and winning two cups.
 

SmytheKing

Registered User
Apr 7, 2007
971
1,408
You don't think they deserved one more kick at that can after three consecutive Western Conference Finals? Completely agree the cracks were there, but I had no problem giving the duct tape a shot before calling it over.

But they failed on that shot, and with the Richards/Voynov/Sutter & Carcillo stuff, it was time to pump the breaks and look at the map instead of gunning it again.

If you take a look at those Cup winning rosters and see how little they got in return for any of those departed players, its astonishing that they thought they could still be competitive.
I understand WHY they did what they did but I think if you (you meaning DL) separate yourself from the emotion of the matter, you know that team didn't have the legs to do it again. I have zero doubt in my mind that if they didn't have that winning streak when they did they'd have been offloading at the deadline and trying to refill and hope for another shot in 2-3 years.

I honestly believe that trade and the Lucic one set the org back FAR MORE than any contract given to the Core 4. You put a Barzal or a Conner or a Boeser or a Konecny on that team with a Jakob Chychrun (they do worse in 2015-2016 and make the right pick here of course) and two or three other 1st rounders over the next three years? That seems a lot better than what ended up happening and it's not at all unrealistic a scenario.
 

TruKingFan

Two-Time Cup Winner
Aug 16, 2004
1,294
838
Beachfront
I honestly believe that trade and the Lucic one set the org back FAR MORE than any contract given to the Core 4. You put a Barzal or a Conner or a Boeser or a Konecny on that team with a Jakob Chychrun (they do worse in 2015-2016 and make the right pick here of course) and two or three other 1st rounders over the next three years? That seems a lot better than what ended up happening and it's not at all unrealistic a scenario.
The DL apologists will never admit It. it’s more convenient to blame the contracts.
 

Axl Rhoadz

Binky distributor
Apr 5, 2011
4,942
3,808
They'll make up excuses that a rebuild was coming, even though his last move was trading a prospect (Erik Cernak) for an oft-injured goalie rental who only appeared in 7 games here. That trade might be even worse than the Zhitnik for Fuhr trade.
McMaster the disaster....lol, ahh that was a fun time to be a Kings fan.
 

Ziggy Stardust

Master Debater
Jul 25, 2002
63,604
35,651
Parts Unknown
McMaster the disaster....lol, ahh that was a fun time to be a Kings fan.
Thankfully he made a few redeeming moves on his way out. It was a rare win when the Kings actually came out on top of a trade back then, and they did that when they acquired Norstrom, Laperriere, Ferraro and LaFayette from the Rangers, and getting Glen Murray for an over-the-hill Ed Olczyk.
 

Lt Dan

F*** your ice cream!
Sep 13, 2018
12,124
20,613
Bayou La Batre
youtu.be
Image 1
Thankfully he made a few redeeming moves on his way out. It was a rare win when the Kings actually came out on top of a trade back then, and they did that when they acquired Norstrom, Laperriere, Ferraro and LaFayette from the Rangers, and getting Glen Murray for an over-the-hill Ed Olczyk.
Oh yeah Mc Master has some serious stinker trades. The questions were always is Gretzky telling him what to do or upper management above him

Some of the worst....
1664312337692.png

1664312391811.png

1664312454475.png

1664312606052.png

1664312639419.png

One of the weirder ones
1664312553718.png



and of course
1664312673055.png
 

Attachments

  • 1664312469579.png
    1664312469579.png
    18.1 KB · Views: 4

Kudelski37

Registered User
Feb 19, 2021
1,129
1,504
  • Like
Reactions: Choralone

Ziggy Stardust

Master Debater
Jul 25, 2002
63,604
35,651
Parts Unknown
What made the Zhitnik deal so terrible was not keeping Boucher. If we do that, it's not nearly as bad, if not even. Phillipe turned out great after he left.
That's how cheap AEG was under Tim Leiweke and Kevin Gilmore. Thanks to them, the Kings nickel and dimed every player when it came to contract negotiations, thus the "Dumpster Dave" moniker came to existence. They lowballed Rob Blake, Luc Robitaille, Philippe Boucher, and signed the likes of Steve Heinze and Randy Robitaille, among other low budget free agent signings the Kings would make year-after-year (like replacing Stu Grimson with Ken Belanger).

When a big name would become a free agent, fans would get excited about the possibility of adding a big name, like Sergei Fedorov or Bill Guerin, but instead they'd wind up trading for the likes of Erik Rasmussen and Derek Armstrong and plugged them into top six roles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ricardfromage
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad