From the previous thread
@Just A Bit Outside
Formenton is a f***ing clown.
Suck it up and deal with the consequences of your actions.
I understand what you're trying to say here and I do think everyone is entitled to exercising their rights. Formenton has the right to sue his former agent. This is separate and apart from his alleged criminal conduct which he is also entitled to have the Crown prove their case.
I haven't read the actual court documents so I am basing everything on what has been reported. Some of the facts alleged seems BS to me. Like I thought he signed in Europe AFTER he was ineligible for the season? He's now saying he suffered a loss because his agent didn't properly advise him of the consequences/impact to his career if he signs in Europe? Doesn't make much sense. Not knowing about the fact he could negotiate an extension on Jan 1 if he signs his QO? Okay... maybe players really don't know these things but sure he should be advised of that but what's the loss?
He's obviously not going to get $20M but I won't say he has no claim. For example, he was only given a qualifying offer which he did not sign. Did he formally reject the offer or let the offer lapse? If he formally rejected the offer then the fact that his agent didn't ask for an extension is irrelevant. But it sounds like he wasn't signing it anyways. So this part that he alleges is just noise.
Obviously circumstances can change quickly and agents do misread the market from time to time. In the normal course of business, the guy is coming off a an 18 goal 32 point season. Every single person here would tell him to reject his QO of $787.5K. BUT that's not knowing about the pending criminal charges. The pending criminal charges changes everything. If his agent was told by the Senators and both sides are of the understanding that Formenton would likely be charged and there will not be another offer besides the QO until the sexual assault allegations are resolved then Formenton's agent should advise Formenton of this and recommend him to accept his QO. If that was the circumstances and his agent told him it's business as usual and he'll 100% get a better deal for him then does this constitute negligence in which he is entitled to damages? Could be.
There's also no recent precedence of players being suspended without pay pending the outcome of a criminal case. Virtanen and other players charged were granted (paid) leaves of absences. I don't anticipate anyone arguing here that he shouldn't have accepted his QO in hindsight?
Columbus would be an intriguing one for a few reasons.
- They are very unfortunate to be down a franchise player and with a ton of cap space (RIP JG).
- They would be far away, so minimal risk of him coming back to haunt us.
- They are chock full of young talent, and this team needs all of the ELC help they can get with the impending OEL crunch.
- Most importantly for Pettersson, he would be a relative nobody in Ohio. Might be the perfect place for him to get a fresh start and focus on hockey again.
Something to think about. If they're interested, I could definitely see a deal.
Plus their GM tried to trade for Petey near the deadline.