Gotta hope for Dallas if you want a competitive final. Can’t see Nurse, Ceci, and Deharnais being part of a single win against the beast that is the Panthers.FLA vs ? for the SC.
Time for the Stars to step up and stop playing like asses and force a game 7.
People were talking like that about Edmonton before the Stars series.Can’t see Nurse, Ceci, and Deharnais being part of a single win against the beast that is the Panthers.
Blake wanted to build this team into the Predators and he succeeded. Gotta give him credit for seeing his vision through until the end I guess.Why doesnt the presidents trophy mean anything? Because the 2nd season is a different style of hockey that wont necessarily be rewarded in the regular season... something that seems to be lost on Waste Management.. my guess is, they arent dumb, they for whatever reason are fine with being in the black hole and being first round fodder... becoming a true contender would take several seasons of DNQ and they dont seem interested in doing that.
I keep hearing this.. i just dont remember when Bleak made that quote re the Preds. What a strange thing to want to be like a small market team that has no choice but try to contend on a smaller budget. Whatever is going on in this org, it is very strange.Blake wanted to build this team into the Predators and he succeeded. Gotta give him credit for seeing his vision through until the end I guess.
Yea that narrative about the Oilers just isnt true this year. I bet on Oilers beating the Panthers in the cup months ago.People were talking like that about Edmonton before the Stars series.
Florida seems like the best team right now, but the Oilers still have the best top tier talent.
In a Oilers/Panthers final I think the goaltending matchup is where Florida might have the biggest advantage.
Didn't the Rangers very intentionally rebuild? Wasn't their even a letter they put out to their fans telling them about it?Sucks Quick won't get his fourth cup this year. But I have some annoyances with the Rangers anyway. Like:
- being lottery eligible despite playing in games the NHL considered the playoffs during the COVID season
- Fox bullying his way to get traded to only one team by literally refusing to sign an ELC with both Calgary and Carolina (which is why Faber playing another year in college was different than the lies being spread about him)
- Trouba and Rempe's frequent reckless or headhunting antics that go unpunished
And the general smug superior attitude that comes with fans who watch teams start on third base.
It's also why I get annoyed at the "Lombardi was just lucky" narrative. Yes, he had fortunate things happen, but he didn't have a Norris-caliber defenseman refuse to sign an ELC with any team but one close to home. He didn't win a lottery weeks after players on his roster increased their career total of playoff points.
It's petty and sour grapes, I know. But even during the cup-winning years, it felt like Kings fans here were largely grounded (though that could be my bias).
I just feel Florida and Dallas have taken a smarter, more methodical and measured approach in roster construction, and I want to see one of them get rewarded.
Rangers rebuilt like the Kings did: “committing” to it for a couple years then bailing on it and acquiring a bunch of vets to be roadblocks for their top rated prospect pool. Only difference is they had a Norris defenseman fall into their lap while we traded ours away, and they have a Shesterkin.Didn't the Rangers very intentionally rebuild? Wasn't their even a letter they put out to their fans telling them about it?
Some teams get more fortunate breaks than others. I would agree the current iterations of the Rangers and Oilers have gotten more than most.
Posters correctly pointing out luck is involved in building a championship team doesn't dimmish the work Lombardi did. I don't understand why it annoys people to acknowledge something so plainly obvious.
Also the Rangers only kept one legacy player in Kreider. The Kings kept Kopitar, Doughty, Carter, and Quick.Rangers rebuilt like the Kings did: “committing” to it for a couple years then bailing on it and acquiring a bunch of vets to be roadblocks for their top rated prospect pool. Only difference is they had a Norris defenseman fall into their lap while we traded ours away, and they have a Shesterkin.
Didn't the Rangers very intentionally rebuild? Wasn't their even a letter they put out to their fans telling them about it?
Some teams get more fortunate breaks than others. I would agree the current iterations of the Rangers and Oilers have gotten more than most.
Posters correctly pointing out luck is involved in building a championship team doesn't dimmish the work Lombardi did. I don't understand why it annoys people to acknowledge something so plainly obvious.
I’ll say that the Oilers have been resilient. Teams can’t seem to step on their necks and press the advantage. IE Stars and Vancouver letting them back in the series. LA not capitalizing in game four this year. Oilers offense never lets them be to far out of a game. If they get to the finals it will be due to defensive buy in and pk.Re EDM/Dal something happened in the 2nd period of game 4 where EDM balls dropped and Stars didnt have an answer in any of the subsequent 5 periods. Its possible Dallas could find their testes in game 6, which would catapult them into game 7. I think they will. Still have the Stars winning it. To me it mostly hinges on Skinner.. if he keeps playing well its EDM, if not Stars... he has been inconsistent most of his career.
Pointing out the multitude of variables involved in achieving such a rare outcome is the opposite of reductionist.Because it’s reductionist nonsense that stifles discourse.
No one disputes that luck plays some kind of factor in sports. This isn’t a revolutionary insight. But luck is often utilized by lazy interlocutors to denigrate the people/teams they dislike without any real logic or statistical support. This is what people take umbrage with.
Kind of strange you don’t grasp this, considering you’ve spent the past three pages lecturing Kings’ fans over their bias against Edmonton.
Pointing out the multitude of variables involved in achieving such a rare outcome is the opposite of reductionist.
Regarding your second sentence; there's a difference between saying that and accepting it. The tone of your posts suggest the latter hasn't happened yet.
The attempt at pedanticism is cute.
I've always kinda liked the Panthers. I enjoyed their run with Vanbiesbrouck back in the day. The whole thing with the rats was so much fun. Plus it's cool seeing a long suffering franchise have success.Florida was an easy choice last season and are again. Great team to watch. Can play it any way you want.
Their fans have never tasted a Cup win. Super easy to root for them.
Doughty is still playing on the Kings.Rangers rebuilt like the Kings did: “committing” to it for a couple years then bailing on it and acquiring a bunch of vets to be roadblocks for their top rated prospect pool. Only difference is they had a Norris defenseman fall into their lap while we traded ours away, and they have a Shesterkin.
It would be funny to see Edmonton make the finals after a couple of decades and proceed to lose to a southeast team who gets their franchise first cup.Florida was an easy choice last season and are again. Great team to watch. Can play it any way you want.
Their fans have never tasted a Cup win. Super easy to root for them.