Antropovsky
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2007
- 15,738
- 7,528
This is beyond the point. A poster blamed Matthews grees for the leafs cap situation. Matthews didn't use the RFA period as leverage. If he did, he would've been paid way more.A team that gets Marner of an offersheet is probably not picking in the top 16 at any point in the 4 years.
What are the odds you can get a player as good as Marner in the back half of the 1st, even if you got 4 shots at it. And the Leafs are still good enough without him that they themselves won't be a high end lottery team so getting a top 5 is unrealistic, unless you're trading 3+ firsts just to move up. like 10 - 15 spots.
Offersheets at the highest level should focus on quality not quantity. And since that is basically impossible I honestly think that offer sheets should not be allowed above a certain $$ level, like 7m.
Tavares definitely took a pay cut to come to Toronto.
Marner was the only player (except Nylander) to use the RFA period as leverage. And he made a spectacle of it. His agent said he wanted to be like his teammates, not like other NHL comparables. At that time he was not worth the same money (which he got) on shorter term than 28 year old, center, former captain, former 1st overall pick, and two time hart finalist Tavares.
And at that time he wasn't worth the same as Matthews, who was pacing Marner but was playing with 3rd line players Johnsson, Kapanen and Marleau, while Marner was with Tavares and Hyman. How many points would Marner have put up with Kapanen, Marleau and Johnsson?
It's certainly not fair to group Matthews or Tavares with Marner. We should praise Matthews if anything. If he wanted the most money he could get, he could have gotten more.
Agreed that getting 4 firsts isn't ideal for the Leafs, especially considering they were hoping to challenge for the cup. This thought was probably considered by Marners team.
Last edited: