Around the League 45: The Stanley Cup is in God's Waiting Room

Discipline Daddy

Brentcent Van Burns
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2009
2,748
7,419
Raleigh, NC
Cap writeup on the Rangers, inspired by the news that Shesterkin said no to 8 years x $11M. Good news is I can't see them maintaining as good of a roster in subsequent years. They don't have a great farm team.

Assuming they ink Shesterkin to a similar deal, here's how I see the roster shaping up for 2025-2026.

Panarin (11.64) - Trocheck (5.63) - Lafreniere (RFA)
Kreider (6.5) - Zibanejad (8.5) - Kakko (RFA)
Cuylle (RFA) - Chytil (4.44) - Brodzinski (0.79)
Edstrom (RFA) - Carrick (1) - Rempe (RFA)

Miller (RFA) - Fox (9.5)
Schneider (2.2) - Trouba (8)
Jones (RFA) - Othmann (0.86)

Shesterkin (UFA)
Quick (UFA)

They have $58.2M committed next year. Projected cap next year is $92.5M, which leaves a boatload of space ($34.3M). That's the good news.

The bad news is almost all of the free agents require raises. I could see this playing out.

Lafreniere: $6M
Kakko: $3M
Edstrom and Rempe - $0.9M each
Add $0.8M for 13F

Miller: $6M
Jones: $2M
7D: $0.8M

Shesterkin: $12M
Backup: $1M

That adds up to $33.4M. If they find a taker for Trouba, say Columbus, they have flexibility to really go shopping. Otherwise, I think status quo is about the best this roster can do to fit under the cap as they don't have as much ELC talent coming in and have to pay up some players on bridge deals.
 

sabremike

#1 Tageaholic
Aug 30, 2010
23,896
36,708
Brewster, NY
Commenters on the Seattle-Blues game are saying that powerplays on fresh ice at the beginning of periods are actually statistically less effective than later in the period. My entire life I've believed a lie.
20230106_124705.jpg
 

HisIceness

This is Hurricanes Hockey
Sep 16, 2010
41,440
73,691
Charlotte
I see the Blackhawks are already in midseason form

They're going to be total garbage for at least another season too, then it will be time to pay Bedard

He had done well as their minor league coach. Worked his way back onto the radar. Has been vocal about developing as a coach and learning from his mistakes, presumably the Buffalo experience.

Well best of luck to him, at he doesn't have Jack Eichel to deal with
 

TheReelChuckFletcher

Former TheRillestPaulFenton; Harverd Alum
Jun 30, 2011
10,910
24,763
Raleigh and Chapel Hill, NC
Verhaeghe, 8 years at $7M per & mostly in bonuses.

Just turned 29 in August.

Verhaeghe took a significant discount relative to UFA value. With value-added cap hits to Forsling/Reinhart/Tkachuk/Verhaeghe, Florida is going to stay excellent for many years to come.
 

CandyCanes

Caniac turned Jerkiac
Jan 8, 2015
7,536
26,145
Commenters on the Seattle-Blues game are saying that powerplays on fresh ice at the beginning of periods are actually statistically less effective than later in the period. My entire life I've believed a lie.
I wonder if that number gets skewed more so because the faceoff on the PP is at center ice at the start of the period. So there’s a statical disadvantage right there.
 

cptjeff

Reprehensible User
Sep 18, 2008
21,486
38,186
Washington, DC.
I wonder if that number gets skewed more so because the faceoff on the PP is at center ice at the start of the period. So there’s a statical disadvantage right there.
I'd guess it has more to do with the PKers being rested. I also wouldn't be sure that the predictability of fresh ice is an advantage for the attackers, odd bounces often create opportunities.
 

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
52,095
51,749
Winston-Salem NC
I wonder if that number gets skewed more so because the faceoff on the PP is at center ice at the start of the period. So there’s a statical disadvantage right there.

I'd guess it has more to do with the PKers being rested. I also wouldn't be sure that the predictability of fresh ice is an advantage for the attackers, odd bounces often create opportunities.
I mean certainly doesn't hurt to take off an additional 5-10 seconds to start the period especially if the team on the kill wins the draw, but what Jeff said is the more likely answer. The puck taking a funny bounce is always an advantage for whoever can get to it first and when there's an extra attacker there's that much more opportunity for the team on the PP to be the ones that get to it.
 

WreckingCrew

Registered User
Feb 4, 2015
13,166
40,296
Commenters on the Seattle-Blues game are saying that powerplays on fresh ice at the beginning of periods are actually statistically less effective than later in the period. My entire life I've believed a lie.
I always thought it was bogus for some of the already mentioned reasons (center ice FO, well rested PKers), but also the "wet" ice seems to make passes harder to receive and it's more slick in general (I know ice is already slick). There's also no momentum from prior play, everyone is calmer, and if it's a "split"/carryover PP there's literally less time on it
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad