Three on three, but once a player comes off, they can’t go on again.Well, either way they should probably consider rules to stop that stupidity.
Ehh I'd just establish a 'shot clock' of sorts in OT that ends up in a whistle if a team doesn't move the puck out of their own zone after 10 seconds or so or blows a play dead if a possessing team willingly pulls the puck from the neutral zone to the defensive or from the offensive zone to neutral. First infraction is a play blown dead, second infraction is an automatic faceoff in your defensive zone, third infraction is a DoG penalty.I'm of the opinion that we should remove the extra points unless it's decided in OT.
1. Give each team a point for reaching OT
2. 5-10 minutes OT with the additional point on the line.
3. If no one scores in that OT, no additional points are awarded.
4. A shootout decides the game winner, and shootout wins are treated as one of the tiebreakers are the end of the year.
Solves almost everything. Teams will be more incentivized to end the game in regulation/OT, the game still ends with a winner and not a tie, and the shootout is put in a less important role than it is now.
I’d sooner get rid of shootouts and just go indefinite sudden death OT with some type of over and back rule in place. My preference is just ties at end of 60 but I know the league won’t do that.I'm of the opinion that we should remove the extra points unless it's decided in OT.
1. Give each team a point for reaching OT
2. 5-10 minutes OT with the additional point on the line.
3. If no one scores in that OT, no additional points are awarded.
4. A shootout decides the game winner, and shootout wins are treated as one of the tiebreakers are the end of the year.
Solves almost everything. Teams will be more incentivized to end the game in regulation/OT, the game still ends with a winner and not a tie, and the shootout is put in a less important role than it is now.
I’d sooner get rid of shootouts and just go indefinite sudden death OT with some type of over and back rule in place. My preference is just ties at end of 60 but I know the league won’t do that.
Indefinite anything in the regular season won't happen because of television.
I'd prefer ties at the end of 10-min 3-on-3. At that point, I'd say the teams were evenly matched on that particular night and just let both walk away with a point. If there are complaints, complain about the team not ending the game in the 70 allotted minutes.
Funny how that doesn’t stop the NBA or MLB.
I imagine the NHLPA also plays a part in that decision, as playing infinite OT means an increased chance of injury, especially in a more physical sport than basketball or baseball
They have the same amount of pts as we do.Nashville is bad. No surprise but they signed ROR like they wanted to be good
That doesn’t change anythingThey have the same amount of pts as we do.
You’re mocking them for making an effort this year and signing ROR, when they’ve been better than expected and ROR has been great for them. It’s an odd team to send your negative vibes toward.That doesn’t change anything
Nice graphic...where'd the time go?
Couldn't happen vs a better opponent tonightLetang is the first defenseman in NHL history (!!!) to have 5 points in a period.
6 assists tonight against NYI.