GDT: Around The League 24/25. Parity, blessed parity.

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
45,872
56,926

Oilers ranked 1st Canadian Team by TSN. Looks like Button will have to flip flop on the Oilers again. These analysts jobs are so easy, just keep changing your opinion until its correct.
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,729
17,645
When I look at the state of the Red Wings, Sabres, and Senators I feel even more thankful that we landed on McDavid and Draisaitl. Feel for the fans of the Sabres in particular, I don't know what you even do there at this point.

Those teams are pretty much what the Oilers would have been had we not struck gold. Teams in C markets that aren't attractive to UFAs or players with NMCs that picked high, but did't land the superstar. Entrenched themselves contractually in a mediocre core that has a lot of talent, but not elite talent, and now they're just stuck. They need to make change, but it isn't clear where.

I have almost no doubt that we would be looking at nearly 20 years outside the playoffs at this point if it weren't for 97 and 29.
 
Apr 12, 2010
75,823
34,998
Calgary
When I look at the state of the Red Wings, Sabres, and Senators I feel even more thankful that we landed on McDavid and Draisaitl. Feel for the fans of the Sabres in particular, I don't know what you even do there at this point.

Those teams are pretty much what the Oilers would have been had we not struck gold. Teams in C markets that aren't attractive to UFAs or players with NMCs that picked high, but did't land the superstar. Entrenched themselves contractually in a mediocre core that has a lot of talent, but not elite talent, and now they're just stuck. They need to make change, but it isn't clear where.

I have almost no doubt that we would be looking at nearly 20 years outside the playoffs at this point if it weren't for 97 and 29.
I guarantee that if the Sabres had won the McDavid lottery that team is at bare minimum a perennial playoff contender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oilers'72

oXo Cube

Power Play Merchant
Nov 4, 2008
11,368
12,333
In your closet
When I look at the state of the Red Wings, Sabres, and Senators I feel even more thankful that we landed on McDavid and Draisaitl. Feel for the fans of the Sabres in particular, I don't know what you even do there at this point.

Those teams are pretty much what the Oilers would have been had we not struck gold. Teams in C markets that aren't attractive to UFAs or players with NMCs that picked high, but did't land the superstar. Entrenched themselves contractually in a mediocre core that has a lot of talent, but not elite talent, and now they're just stuck. They need to make change, but it isn't clear where.

I have almost no doubt that we would be looking at nearly 20 years outside the playoffs at this point if it weren't for 97 and 29.

What they should do in Buffalo is nothing. Patience is difficult and I think most of us on this board of all boards understand that but the Sabres are only in this mess because they ran out of it early.

It's actually an underlying problem with the league on a macro level IMO that it takes way, way too long for teams in the basement to climb back into relevance but I have no idea what can or should be done about it.
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,729
17,645
What they should do in Buffalo is nothing. Patience is difficult and I think most of us on this board of all boards understand that but the Sabres are only in this mess because they ran out of it early.

It's actually an underlying problem with the league on a macro level IMO that it takes way, way too long for teams in the basement to climb back into relevance but I have no idea what can or should be done about it.

It depends 100% on the market.

Hot, attractive, low tax market? Be bad for a year or two, get a few solid young players, supplement with your pick of UFA signings and players that will waive NMCs to go to you. Returning to a base level playoff team in 3-5 years is not that hard here. The cherry on top is the player that will only waive their NMC for specific teams. Then the Panthers and the Knights of the world get the player AND get them at a discount.

Cold, high tax, unsexy market? You better pray that you land a big, big fish when you tank in the draft, and you better hope some other picks land. When these teams stink nobody is signing there, and nobody is waiving trade protection to go. These teams have to be good before that is a possibility. These teams basically have to draft nearly the entirety of their roster and hope it works.

There isn't really a way around the UFAs, but one way to even out the competitive balance is to take away the ability for players to waive their NMCs for only specific teams. Either has to be a waive for all or a waive for none. This would have limited about half of the Knights and Panthers acquisitions over the past few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oilers'72

5 Mins 4 Ftg

Life is better with no expectations.
Sponsor
Apr 3, 2016
52,302
91,200
Edmonton
What they should do in Buffalo is nothing. Patience is difficult and I think most of us on this board of all boards understand that but the Sabres are only in this mess because they ran out of it early.

1733849169768.gif
 

oXo Cube

Power Play Merchant
Nov 4, 2008
11,368
12,333
In your closet
It depends 100% on the market.

Hot, attractive, low tax market? Be bad for a year or two, get a few solid young players, supplement with your pick of UFA signings and players that will waive NMCs to go to you. Returning to a base level playoff team in 3-5 years is not that hard here. The cherry on top is the player that will only waive their NMC for specific teams. Then the Panthers and the Knights of the world get the player AND get them at a discount.

Cold, high tax, unsexy market? You better pray that you land a big, big fish when you tank in the draft, and you better hope some other picks land. When these teams stink nobody is signing there, and nobody is waiving trade protection to go. These teams have to be good before that is a possibility. These teams basically have to draft nearly the entirety of their roster and hope it works.

There isn't really a way around the UFAs, but one way to even out the competitive balance is to take away the ability for players to waive their NMCs for only specific teams. Either has to be a waive for all or a waive for none. This would have limited about half of the Knights and Panthers acquisitions over the past few years.

Eh, While there is some truth to this for sure(hello NYR) I don't think it's really that black and white even.

Anaheim and San Jose are both considered highly attractive markets and they've sucked for half a decade now. Florida was one of the leagues running jokes for like 2 decades. Detroit hasn't really had any issues bringing in or retaining anyone they want and they're coming up on year 9 of missing the playoffs. Tampa Bay had the best management group in the NHL between Stamkos and Yzerman moving on yet even they had a stretch where they made the playoffs only once in 7 seasons.

It's just really hard to climb out of the basement when the 'prize' for bottoming out is a player 3-5 years away from his physical prime and only plays ~one third of the game even if he does turn out to be as good you think he might be on draft day. Then once your upward trajectory stalls out teams try to accelerate the process by selling their dollar for three quarters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oilers'72

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,729
17,645
Eh, While there is some truth to this for sure(hello NYR) I don't think it's really that black and white even.

Anaheim and San Jose are both considered highly attractive markets and they've sucked for half a decade now. Florida was one of the leagues running jokes for like 2 decades. Detroit hasn't really had any issues bringing in or retaining anyone they want and they're coming up on year 9 of missing the playoffs. Tampa Bay had the best management group in the NHL between Stamkos and Yzerman moving on yet even they had a stretch where they made the playoffs only once in 7 seasons.

It's just really hard to climb out of the basement when the 'prize' for bottoming out is a player 3-5 years away from his physical prime and only plays ~one third of the game even if he does turn out to be as good you think he might be on draft day. Then once your upward trajectory stalls out teams try to accelerate the process by selling their dollar for three quarters.

I think it's a newer phenomenon, last 5-7 years or so. Players are more selective than they ever have been before about market and the tax position of the market. California also doesn't have the tax box checked. Panthers were the Siberia of the NHL until players realized that paying no tax, no pressure, and being able to drive a golf cart to the rink every day is something they prefer.

Tampa built organically the first time, but they haven't had a hard time keeping the train rolling the moment certain parts of their team age out. Stamkos gone? Guentzel come on down. Or in Nashville - need scoring? Just sign the two sexiest scorers on the UFA market (this didn't work out, but on paper it made sense). That type of easy snap of your fingers acquisition(s) just wound't happen in Edmonton or Buffalo.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TB12 and oilers'72

oobga

Tier 2 Fan
Aug 1, 2003
25,186
21,612
I think Shesterkin has hidden a lot of the flaws with that roster.

I feel this every time I watch them. It's like their game plan is designed to leave him out to dry.

At least he is being compensated nicely for that going forward :)
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,895
15,635
Edmonton
I was really hoping they would've beaten the Panthers last year. Shesterkin was the only thing keeping that series close. I think we would've beaten them.
The Panthers were the last team I wanted to face. The Panthers Cup loss was to fresh for them and they had that extra motivation and experience that the other Eastern teams didn’t have.
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,729
17,645
The Panthers were the last team I wanted to face. The Panthers Cup loss was to fresh for them and they had that extra motivation and experience that the other Eastern teams didn’t have.

The Panthers were and still are hands down the best team in the East IMO. I don't think any other teams in that Conference are close in the context of beating them in a 7 game series. They can beat you in multiple ways and I don't think that is the case for any other team in the East.
 
Apr 12, 2010
75,823
34,998
Calgary
The Panthers were and still are hands down the best team in the East IMO. I don't think any other teams in that Conference are close in the context of beating them in a 7 game series. They can beat you in multiple ways and I don't think that is the case for any other team in the East.
Agreed. We were really the only team that gave them a significant challenge and even then...
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,895
15,635
Edmonton
The Panthers were and still are hands down the best team in the East IMO. I don't think any other teams in that Conference are close in the context of beating them in a 7 game series. They can beat you in multiple ways and I don't think that is the case for any other team in the East.
The 2 day break instead of the traditional 1 day break during the finals was a huge advantage for Bobrovsky. He might have been drained by game 7 with all the travel and short rest.
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,729
17,645
The 2 day break instead of the traditional 1 day break during the finals was a huge advantage for Bobrovsky. He might have been drained by game 7 with all the travel and short rest.

The 2 day break in the Finals needs to end, but I'm sure it just won't.

Attrition is part of winning the Stanley Cup. I don't care if their flights are a little longer than normal compared to the Conference series.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad