JediOrderPizza
Registered User
What sucks is I probably have to miss the season opener cause of this dumb hurricane. @Konnan511 Stay safe.
Yep, it's coming right for us. This morning it was a Cat 2, now it's a Cat 5. I am hoping that it loses steam as it gets close to landfall. My job is shutting down starting tomorrow, through the rest of this week.What sucks is I probably have to miss the season opener cause of this dumb hurricane. @Konnan511 Stay safe.
Yep, it's coming right for us. This morning it was a Cat 2, now it's a Cat 5. I am hoping that it loses steam as it gets close to landfall. My job is shutting down starting tomorrow, through the rest of this week.
Stay safe brother.
What sucks is I probably have to miss the season opener cause of this dumb hurricane. @Konnan511 Stay safe.
I think 11M a year is a couple of millions too much for a goalie.curious what everyone else thinks of the Shesterkin apparently turning down 8/$88m. The guy has been great in the playoffs but that's a lot of coin to throw at a goalie who is going to be in his thirties for essentially the whole deal. I'd be looking at how hard they could game the cap this year and try to ride him to a Cup before tearing it down a bit (dealing Trouba and Panarin over the summer).
If I'm dropping $11M on a goalie MF better not ever allow more than 2 goals in a game. Which is my way of saying I'm never paying $11M for a goalie (unless the cap is at like $200M). Gimme a $7M defenseman and $4M goalie.I think 11M a year is a couple of millions too much for a goalie.
Ullmark going for 8.25 x 4 , some guy named Daccord getting 5x5... suddenly don't mind our goalie situation as much.
8.25 for a potential 1a-b type goalie is nuts. Daccord one season of good play locked up longer term, is dumb as well.
Just looked at Stanley Cup odds and see that New Jersey is listed as the 2nd/3rd favorite??? I was confused by the love for them last year, but was sure people would learn their lesson by now.
They should be involved in the Detroit/Ottawa/Montreal/Buffalo slap-fights of "our prospects are better then your prospects and in 3-4 years, look out!", not legitimate contenders right now.
No. But I am capable of looking at a team that had 72, 68, 45, 63 points in the 4 seasons before that and then look at their roster and say that 112 points was probably a flukewere you in a coma for the season the year before that when they had 112 points or something?
No. But I am capable of looking at a team that had 72, 68, 45, 63 points in the 4 seasons before that and then look at their roster and say that 112 points was probably a fluke
they also had some of the best underlying advanced stats in the league and one of the best goal differentials in the league that year though
you may not want to personally give a team credit based off of one season but there's nothing that should be even remotely confusing about it
Did they play without goalies or something?