UnkleKraker
Registered User
Zadorov is not good and everyone goddamn knows it.
He still has time, he is only... 28?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27998/27998eed92ccd134ee0471460daedba4386654b2" alt="sarcasm :sarcasm: :sarcasm:"
Zadorov is not good and everyone goddamn knows it.
It will be interesting to watch. The vast majority of their short cuts are off the book next summer or the summer after... which is good timing for their picks to develop. When you look 3 years out, they only have 4 guys signed... and usually the biggest issues with UFA shortcuts are the termed ones. They have Copp and Compher on those deals, but they are young enough it should be fine. The Perron, Ghost, Sprong, Kane, Maata, Petry etc are giving them good depth and support while not being anchors. Next year they can break in a defensemen and then a forward or two with the expiring deals. Then to the same the following season. I don't know if it will work perfectly, but they've built a Seattle like depth team with a path towards becoming younger over 2-3 seasons... and zero cap complications in the near future.Wings took a ton of shortcuts which is usually a huge mistake on the long run. We'll see.
It will be interesting to watch. The vast majority of their short cuts are off the book next summer or the summer after... which is good timing for their picks to develop. When you look 3 years out, they only have 4 guys signed... and usually the biggest issues with UFA shortcuts are the termed ones. They have Copp and Compher on those deals, but they are young enough it should be fine. The Perron, Ghost, Sprong, Kane, Maata, Petry etc are giving them good depth and support while not being anchors. Next year they can break in a defensemen and then a forward or two with the expiring deals. Then to the same the following season. I don't know if it will work perfectly, but they've built a Seattle like depth team with a path towards becoming younger over 2-3 seasons... and zero cap complications in the near future.
I think Detroit is one of the more interesting stories to watch and learn from. They could prove or disprove the depth debate in a way. If they do well and make a run, they make a case that you can build depth via UFA and take a below average team to a good one in a span of an offseason without going after the high profile guys.
In a way, Detroit took the Vegas/Seattle model and applied it to an existing team.
Yeah we've seen it very clearly on expansion and St Louis is another good example. I don't know if it will work for Detroit, but that's clearly the gameplan. Screw breaking in the young guys early... sign the cast off depth guys for cheap on short terms, and then when the kids are 21-22-23 they can step in to a team already winning. That's the whole idea. If it works, teams will copy.Depth teams work, Vegas more on their first run, and then STL are proof.
I'm wondering if Detroit has the heavy checking play style to really pull that off, as well as the goalie needed.
If they make the playoffs it should be interesting.
Yeah we've seen it very clearly on expansion and St Louis is another good example. I don't know if it will work for Detroit, but that's clearly the gameplan. Screw breaking in the young guys early... sign the cast off depth guys for cheap on short terms, and then when the kids are 21-22-23 they can step in to a team already winning. That's the whole idea. If it works, teams will copy.
I guess we'll see if it works. I'm sure that Detroit would have loved to receive some lottery luck and get some higher draft picks with true star potential. They played Seider heavy minutes early, so I do wonder how much of the current setup is a function of a plan to let prospects develop and how much is just forced on them by prospects not being ready to jump in.Yeah we've seen it very clearly on expansion and St Louis is another good example. I don't know if it will work for Detroit, but that's clearly the gameplan. Screw breaking in the young guys early... sign the cast off depth guys for cheap on short terms, and then when the kids are 21-22-23 they can step in to a team already winning. That's the whole idea. If it works, teams will copy.
I guess we'll see if it works. I'm sure that Detroit would have loved to receive some lottery luck and get some higher draft picks with true star potential. They played Seider heavy minutes early, so I do wonder how much of the current setup is a function of a plan to let prospects develop and how much is just forced on them by prospects not being ready to jump in.
If we consider the Blues' Cup win as a weird exception (or pretend it didn't happen at all, which I'm down with), it's hard to find a Cup winning team without a couple bona fide stars when looking back at the previous 15 years.
Kuemper pulled after 3GA and 2 saves.Yotes lead 5-0 after 1 vs Caps
Ovi is probably debating how long he wants to remain with Caps. It's going to be a long 3 to 4 years and trying to chase the goal record is going to get harder each yearYotes lead 5-0 after 1 vs Caps
Charlie Lindgren gives them a chance to win. Kuemper is so bad lol.Yotes lead 5-0 after 1 vs Caps
He's everywhere!
They already miss him for sure.I think Vegas is gonna miss Reilly Smith somewhat similar like Avs missed Kadri following a cup win next season. They replaced a 50 point player in Smith with Barbashev who’s on pace for 30 points