It's absolutely absurd. He came over to NA and did a complete face plant, and the Rangers probably get a better pick than what they used on him. Christ almighty.
He basically had the same d+3 that Reilly Walsh did, was anyone going to give us a 1st round pick for him? We got absolute f***ing scraps for Ty Smith. Same age, similar terrible year after a great year. It's really f***ing old watching other teams just shine their goddman shoes for them.
Instead of looking at one season (and you've identified the wrong season), played in the apparent hellscape of Hartford where nobody wants to ever play, how about looking at Lundkvist's entire career, including his D+3 where he tied for an SHL team lead in goals as a 20 year old defenseman? Beating up on the WHL is one thing, beating up on a men's pro league, at worst the 4th best league in the world, is quite another.
Tying up a pick for 4 years isn't good either.
It doesn’t suck, it’s still a 1st, not a 2nd and this draft looks strong. It’s a bit shocking but I don’t have any take on Lundkvist’s viability.
He has two years left on his ELC, unlike Smith, who has one left and he’s RHD. If he can play in the NHL now that’s a cheap defenseman for two years.
It doesn't suck in terms of value, it sucks for the Rangers' window. They need to flip this pick or the player taken with it, IMO. Rangers have 3 big declining contracts and Shesterkin only has 3 more years of being this cheap. In 2025-26, the Rangers have $53 million tied up with 7 players, none of whom are Shesterkin. Maybe that's an argument to keep this pick but it's hard to see how the Rangers are significant contenders in 3 years.
That trade sucked because the Rangers were desperate to add third liners with grit…but when they have to trade failed prospects and get rid of cap hits they usually do make out like bandits.
Meh. I don't think getting 60th overall for Lias Andersson, 3 years after he was the 7th overall pick, is all that good.
No clue what Lundkvist will do in Dallas, but I do wonder if the Rangers are able to sometimes get other teams to give them excess value the same way the Yankees have often done it in baseball: their presence as "but we're in NEW YAWK" often means their prospects and young players get overrated just by sheer exposure.
That said, no, the Rangers don't win every deal they make, and I still have questions about their player development system.
I don't think this is a thing. The Rangers have zero national footprint. This happens with the Leafs, not the Rangers.