Ok, I see your point. If you are referring to BLuc, I agree, but wasn't Carter also part of the faulty foundation on which they were trying to build. Carter looked around and didn't see any leadership from the guys who were supposed to be taking on that role, and decided he would just go along for the ride.
I am concerned this team won't get better until the organization cleans house again. This former Kings player nepotism has never worked well for the Kings and has failed with other teams as well, most notably the Oilers.
I am for firing Robitaille and Blake tomorrow and giving a solid hockey management team a chance. Start with a call to John Davidson, and go from there.
This is as far as I can get with my thinking.
Lombardi built a culture of compete, and brought in a coach (Sutter) who will win by attrition. Unfortunately, it has a short shelf life, and the solution was to try to bring in staff to make the players happy.
I don't know what "identity" they were going for. They want pace and skill. They have some skilled prospects to rebuild that, but what vets did Blake bring in?
I fully expect Blake at least to be let go if he misses the playoffs next season.
It's very possible the Kings won't get better until they clean house. I don't like calling for that, as many jobs get affected by this. All I do know is what they currently have is not working. Whether it's new staff, new approach, new execution, or new training regiment, players will continue to have decreased value from offense.
Bland touched on a key point where offense is not generated from the blueline. Shots not getting through, breakout passes, net attacking, etc.
Makar is an elite talent on Colorado, and he's among the best at it. But the entire team executes, which makes the team successful.