Sol
Smile
- Jun 30, 2017
- 25,052
- 21,322
Even if he hasn't it would be a great hire.
Yeah, no. If DL is the same guy that left the Kings then the Canucks would be boned.
Last edited:
Even if he hasn't it would be a great hire.
He's a 2x Stanley Cup winning, jet-setter GM. A man with vision, and a man who commands the room. I HOPE VAN doesn't hire him. Watch him flip that franchise around, especially with all the young talent they have up and coming -- where his specialty lies. His mold eventually growing stale and "in love" with his winners, aside. He is the GM any young team should be wetting themselves for.Yeah, no. If DL is the same guy that left the Kings then the Canucks would be boned.
Yeah, no. If DL is the same guy that left the Kings then the Canucks would be boned.
anything new or what brings this up?Voynov is no-doubt getting a formal NHL suspension
Give him the 30 games Bettman, let him get back on the ice and done with.
The tears of fans that have an issue with it will be crushed into the ice by the Kings' zamboni.
Yeah, no. If DL is the same guy that left the Kings then the Canucks would be boned.
Nothing new and i have no idea why I brought that up, especially in the wrong thread, YP. Stream of consciousness in a reply box, like a flashy toy for a 5 year old. I thought I was replying to previous posts, not realizing I had left the thread where it was maybe relevant.anything new or what brings this up?
I don’t care how many question marks we have right now, wouldn’t trade that for winning two cups in three years....ever. I could probably list about 30 other teams that wish they could encounter that problem.
Thanks DL.
His model won't fly in the current NHL trend.DL can build a contender. He just can't keep a team on top after winning. A lot of teams would like to have that sort of issue.
He sure didn't help the band after he assembled it.turned under performing aging roster into contender. DL's downfall was loyalty and trying to keep the band together, he didn't have any issues creating the band. If he can create a good team in Vancouver it is a good get for them.
Dumbest thing I’ve read on this board all week.
His model won't fly in the current NHL trend.
He sure didn't help the band after he assembled it.
Instead of making petty remarks maybe you could say why?
DL was fired for a reason and if he tried to build another grit team in the current NHL they would fail.
The NHL is and was trending into a direction that DL didn't accept. Let's stop with the misplaced boners people have for DL thinking he could replicate the same success in a different setting / trend.
No one is undermining his accomplishments. More so using his recent stint and actions which found him fired.
The climate of the sport changed into an area DL isn't good with. If it was 2007-2008 and Vancouver got him, sure it'd be a real good hire cause the NHL was grind and grit.
he had success building San Jose into a divisional champion and a team that was constantly one of the best in the league. He never won a cup there but I think turning a team that was faltering into what they would become in the dead puck, clutch and grab era is something he should be proud of.
Than he took over the LA kings in the post cap era. Seems like he was able to adjust to the new environment around him and we all know what he did for LA. I am sure there were neigh Sayers who would have used his most recent stint in San Jose and most recent actions about his inability to push San Jose over the top, and the likely said he would not be able to push the kings over the top. Enter dealing for Carter and Gaborik. So he learned from his past.
If the NHL is trending into a different direction I do not doubt he will be able to adjust and would be good for Vancouver. He has done it twice in two different environments in two different eras. History says he can do it again.
Now tell me this, he REFUSED to change for the Kings. He refused to adjust. What makes you so certain he will completely uproot every philosophy he preached?
He didn't do it for the Kings.
Some of his final words on record as a GM were insinuating that Pittsburgh is an anomaly. "Flavor of the month" while our team was falling off the face of the planet. How does that insinuate anything other than keeping the course?I don't see how he refused to change for the kings. I think he was in the process of changing and got shown the door before being able to adjust. Sutter was gone either way. I think the firing of DL was a surprise. He had talked about learning about being too loyal, the need to get younger and faster and then was fired before being able to do those things.
That's the way a lot of teams operate. GM's are very seldom given the chance to take the team down a different path then they are already on. We will never know this though.
The people on this board are sometimes so stuck in the past it's amazing.
Some of his final words on record as a GM were insinuating that Pittsburgh is an anomaly. "Flavor of the month" while our team was falling off the face of the planet. How does that insinuate anything other than keeping the course?
The same guy who hired Ds when the Kings couldn't score under Terry Murray. Yeah we won the cup with DS no doubt, but we kept a similar archetype of a coach with DS. How does that give you any idea that he will suddenly adopt an offensive brand of hockey when he never has.
Some of his final words on record as a GM were insinuating that Pittsburgh is an anomaly. "Flavor of the month" while our team was falling off the face of the planet. How does that insinuate anything other than keeping the course?
The same guy who hired Ds when the Kings couldn't score under Terry Murray. Yeah we won the cup with DS no doubt, but we kept a similar archetype of a coach with DS. How does that give you any idea that he will suddenly adopt an offensive brand of hockey when he never has.
The idea that DL wouldn't be able to build a team is probably the funniest thing I've read this week. Talk about a lack of appreciation.
Do people really think he would enter a new job with the same vision?
Gms hire coaches who get fired and don't change still. If you think DL will change to that extent then that's just blind hope.Yet, you think that DL is such a dummy that he hasn't learned a thing on why he isn't still the GM of the LA Kings?? Who's stuck in the past now?
Silly to think DL wouldn’t learn from this and apply it moving forward.
The idea that DL wouldn't be able to build a team is probably the funniest thing I've read this week. Talk about a lack of appreciation.
Do people really think he would enter a new job with the same vision?