johnjm22
Pseudo Intellectual
- Aug 2, 2005
- 21,481
- 18,931
"failed to improve the team" is absolutely ridiculous by any metric.
Yes, they were worse after the trade. We were on track to miss the playoffs.
"failed to improve the team" is absolutely ridiculous by any metric.
Yes, and the Flyers didn't go anywhere probably in part because of it. They eeked into the second round then got swept. I mean they had Richards still, why didn't he lead them to the cup?
The idea that the Flyers haven't won anything because they traded Richards is silly and you know it.
.
Neither can you And winning is a lot more than points/pace in the playoffs. Simmonds has not stood out or been that difference maker, that got them the W. You take those paper props, the 'ppg's and I'll take the fact Richards has helped teams get to 5 Con Finals and 3 Cup finals.
Simmonds? Playing golf...
I have nothing against Richards. I like him. I like the game he played when he was a successful player. I was actually opposed to buying him out in the summer of 2014. Where I differ from most, is that I think he's way overrated. I think we overpaid for him. I also think stuff like "intangibles" and "leadership" are mostly overrated media hype.You mean in 2011, when Richards played the entire season with torn ligaments and cartilage in his left wrist, (told ESPN by March that year the pain was crippling and overtook everything he did) and got pneumonia the week the series vs Buffalo started, dropped close to 15 lbs? He never missed a shift, despite the fact he was sick. Had the hardest job in that series, shutting down the Vanek line, highest scoring line in the league that year. Richards and Versteeg (also playing hurt) held that line to 1 ES goal in 7 games. He was on the ice for 7 goals for and 0 against. Danny Briere is a great offensive playoff guy , a clutch scorer, but horrid on d, that series he was lauded for his 'timely goals' Six for and oh, the stat they don't mention 5 against.
Hockey is a tough sport, nobody forsaw the concussion in Nov 2011 (which he should have stayed out longer,) and another one in May 2013.
This far too much a black and white issue. No middle ground. For me, being a leader, getting the job done, sacrificing everything, including your body, to win, is just as important as goals.
Flyers teams have failed 5 straight years because they start off poor, first month, horrid, and that is on the so-called leaders, who have done little to nothing , I've watcher Mason and Neuvy struggle to keep them in games. THey end up 5th,6th place and trade quicksand the rest of the year to catch up.
That 3 different coaches and systems, same result. It's not always about goals and points, it's about winning.
Agree.Lets not forget Simmonds is used in a completely different fashion in Philly than LA.
Disagree.Nothing at the time pointed him being that same player in LA. Philly made him who he is today.
Draisaitl looks like he will be a great player in the NHL. He had a great playoff and has the all the tools necessary to be successful in that environment.
Big mistake by Edmonton if they trade him. McDavid isn't worth, what is it $13M? No player is worth such a large percentage of a team's overall cap space.
Kopitar's 2nd deal was approximately 12% of the cap, McDavid's contract would be for 17.5% of the Oiler's cap. While McDavid is the better player at this stage of their careers he isn't worth an additional 5% of the cap space.
It will be a shame for the Oilers if they end up losing Draisaitl due to McDavid's contract.
As an aside Kopitar's current deal ate up 13.7% of the Kings cap space last season, and will eat up 13.3% this season. Dean really screwed the pooch on the Kopitar deal.
Draisaitl looks like he will be a great player in the NHL. He had a great playoff and has the all the tools necessary to be successful in that environment.
Big mistake by Edmonton if they trade him. McDavid isn't worth, what is it $13M? No player is worth such a large percentage of a team's overall cap space.
Kopitar's 2nd deal was approximately 12% of the cap, McDavid's contract would be for 17.5% of the Oiler's cap. While McDavid is the better player at this stage of their careers he isn't worth an additional 5% of the cap space.
It will be a shame for the Oilers if they end up losing Draisaitl due to McDavid's contract.
As an aside Kopitar's current deal ate up 13.7% of the Kings cap space last season, and will eat up 13.3% this season. Dean really screwed the pooch on the Kopitar deal.
Draisaitl looks like he will be a great player in the NHL. He had a great playoff and has the all the tools necessary to be successful in that environment.
Big mistake by Edmonton if they trade him. McDavid isn't worth, what is it $13M? No player is worth such a large percentage of a team's overall cap space.
Kopitar's 2nd deal was approximately 12% of the cap, McDavid's contract would be for 17.5% of the Oiler's cap. While McDavid is the better player at this stage of their careers he isn't worth an additional 5% of the cap space.
It will be a shame for the Oilers if they end up losing Draisaitl due to McDavid's contract.
As an aside Kopitar's current deal ate up 13.7% of the Kings cap space last season, and will eat up 13.3% this season. Dean really screwed the pooch on the Kopitar deal.
If Kopitar has another 50-60 point season, Boy it will be another painful year.
Agree.
Disagree.
If you look deeper into the stats, Simmonds was one of the Kings best offensive players at even strength relative to his ice time. Usually coaches recognize this, and put said player in a scoring role and reward them with PP time. I think the Flyer's staff saw the offensive upside that the Kings staff didn't. It didn't take long for Simmonds to be put in scoring role in Philly.
But this is part of what the cap is designed to do. It forces talent to be spread around the NHL.
If McDavid isn't worth the 13M in your opinion, are you saying you would trade him? Or force him into a hold out? Paying him 13M sucks, but the other options aren't exactly appealing either.
Why is it so hard for fans on messageboards to just agree that both teams benefitted from a trade, it's like both sides get so dug in on their teams side that they lose all objectivity.
The Kings got a much needed piece to their 2012 cup run, a player that made a number of key plays in 2012 that Jarret Stoll or Brayden Schenn wouldn't have been able to make. Stoll has stone hands and Schenn never could have shouldered the responsibility Richards had defensively in 2012.
The Flyers got rid of what was going to turn into the NHL's worst contract and added a wonderful future star in Simmonds and now some new assets for Schenn. Philly was not winning the cup in the years 11/12 or 12/13 when MR was still an effective player. And by the end all the rumors and bad press about off the ice stuff were correct.
You guys take some odd positions like the Kings would have won in 2012 without Richards and the Kings wouldn't have won in 2014 without him.
This trade seems to always be brought up from the grave, usually when Johnny mentions Simmonds in anyway. If you are going to evaluate it you have to look at the reality that it was two different players. Richards in 2012 was probably about at the same level Carter is now, an excellent 2nd line center, Richards in 2014 was probably about the same level as Andreoff is now, a below average 4th line center.
But this is part of what the cap is designed to do. It forces talent to be spread around the NHL.
If McDavid isn't worth the 13M in your opinion, are you saying you would trade him? Or force him into a hold out? Paying him 13M sucks, but the other options aren't exactly appealing either.
This idea that a team will have to shell $$ out for their star player is something Kings17 will never understand. Wouldn't it be nice if each team had a McDavid? Then we can see who can build a better team under the a system i.e., draft well, trade sensibly, etc.