KingsFan7824
Registered User
- Dec 4, 2003
- 19,537
- 7,615
Times change. People (especially Edmonton fans) cling to the narrative that Gretzky was traded for money reasons. While somewhat true, Pocklington believed Gretzky was pretty much past his prime and the Oilers could move on without him while simultaneously restocking their cupboard for years to come. And he was mostly right. The Oilers won a Cup Gretzky-less just two years after.
The Penguins may be reaching that point with Crosby. Something's clearly not working in Pittsburgh, and Malkin is and has been the better on ice contributor for some time. And even selling low on Crosby would net an absurd return, the most absurd return we've seen since the Gretzky trade. One or two valued roster players, a top prospect, and multiple high round picks. Every single team in the league would be interested in Crosby, because you would most likely be sending salary back in the form of your own top guys.
That might be going a bit too far. The same way nobody wants to be the guy trading Crosby, who wants to be the guy giving up that much for Crosby? When his cap hit is what it is, which is part of the issue in Pittsburgh. When his play might be declining. When injuries might be taking their toll. You could hamstring your own team the same way Pittsburgh looks to be finding themselves in a bind.
From the numbers standpoint, not so much the PR, it would probably be tougher for the Penguins to trade Crosby today than it was for the Oilers to trade Gretzky then. They could do it, but it would take some work.