Around Hockey XII (All Non-Jackets Hockey talk in here)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,777
35,423
40N 83W (approx)
i wish i was pimp enough to pull off the Evander Kane HFC Lavender Suit

hqdefault.jpg
The tie is lavender, but I think the suit would be better described as "pink".
 

candyman82

Registered User
Mar 29, 2012
2,792
8
Fredericksburg, VA
Am I the only person who thinks that the John Scott hit wasn't dirty? Scott glides into Eriksson with his elbow tucked, making a legal bodycheck. To me, the principle point of contact (or whatever phrase they're using now) is Scott's forearm hitting Eriksson's chest. The shoulder hitting the head seems to be secondary and accidental.

I know a lot of people see Loui Eriksson get laid out by John Scott and think "Get that cheapshotting goon out of the game", but Scott does not have a history of supplemental discipline. The dirtiest thing he has done recently was scaring Phil Kessel. Being marginally-skilled does not deny you the right to check a skilled player.
 

candyman82

Registered User
Mar 29, 2012
2,792
8
Fredericksburg, VA
Only? Probably not, but certainly among the few. Looked to me that the primary contact was shoulder to head, and that's suspendable.

The more I watch the video, the more I see forearm to chest as the primary contact and the shoulder to the head as the secondary contact. IMO, if Scott was trying to hit the head from the angle he was coming in on he would have extended his elbow.
 

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
34,651
15,880
Exurban Cbus
They are having problems with this "principle point of contact" concept. The NFL is having them too.

The "point of contact" can be difficult to determine. Of course a player's head is going to snap back even if he's hit in the chest or shoulder. Add in that the players are different heights, are wearing padding which obscures detail and are moving at high rates of speed.

To this incident specifically: I have a negative view of Scott from the Kessel/Leafs line brawl incident. However, Scott did seem surprised last night. You could read his lips as he sat in the penalty box before being sent off, he was saying "head shot?" That said, he clearly swings his elbow before and through the hit. Plus the hit is "across" instead of "through" the opposing player. Those are often the worst, and what Shanahan refers to in his explanatory vids as "improper angle."

To these kinds of things in general: I'm on record as wondering why this stuff happens all too often, questioning some players' respect for fellow players. But I'll admit the difference between a clean check and a dirty play is often a fine line.
 
Last edited:

Samkow

Now do Classical Gas
Jul 4, 2002
16,354
488
Detroit
Am I the only person who thinks that the John Scott hit wasn't dirty? Scott glides into Eriksson with his elbow tucked, making a legal bodycheck. To me, the principle point of contact (or whatever phrase they're using now) is Scott's forearm hitting Eriksson's chest. The shoulder hitting the head seems to be secondary and accidental.

I know a lot of people see Loui Eriksson get laid out by John Scott and think "Get that cheapshotting goon out of the game", but Scott does not have a history of supplemental discipline. The dirtiest thing he has done recently was scaring Phil Kessel. Being marginally-skilled does not deny you the right to check a skilled player.

Yes.

BXUI5lXCMAA6Pkf.jpg:large
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,777
35,423
40N 83W (approx)
The more I watch the video, the more I see forearm to chest as the primary contact and the shoulder to the head as the secondary contact. IMO, if Scott was trying to hit the head from the angle he was coming in on he would have extended his elbow.

Haven't watched the video to the extent others have, but I get the impression that it was the follow-through and the angle, not the initial contact, that made it a reprehensible and evil act.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,777
35,423
40N 83W (approx)
http://canucks.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=688217

Holy crap that's terrible. If Rimer ever put out something that lousy, I'd be embarrassed.

See my signature for how I feel about persecution complexes.
Just because you are a quiet star and go about your business on a daily basis to the best of your extra-ordinary ability does not mean you should not get the special treatment you deserve.

Oh, so now this whole "protecting stars" thing is necessary and deserved?

**** this guy.
 

candyman82

Registered User
Mar 29, 2012
2,792
8
Fredericksburg, VA
If you watch the video, you will see he "winds up" his arm prior to making contact and "swings" it through making the hit.

He drives it through Eriksson's chest. His shoulder is what makes contact with Eriksson's head.

This was not a charge, a late hit, an elbow, nor a targetted headshot. It's a clean body-check with an unfortunate outcome.
 

jackets4life

Registered User
Jan 16, 2013
1,660
9
Section 203
He drives it through Eriksson's chest. His shoulder is what makes contact with Eriksson's head.

This was not a charge, a late hit, an elbow, nor a targetted headshot. It's a clean body-check with an unfortunate outcome.

Not sure if serious? You may be correct that he does not use his elbow directly to Loui's head, but the dude went out of his way to come across the ice and pick the head. In my opinion, this will be at least a 15 game suspension, if not more.

I hope this is the time the NHL finally draws the line and stops with the little 5 game suspensions and starts really disciplining these clowns.
 

Fro

Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
Mar 11, 2009
25,316
4,994
The Beach, FL
comes from other side of ice in straight line for Eriksson...i was pretty certain last night it was a charge...
 

Mayor Bee

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
18,087
535
The purpose of a check is to separate the other player from the puck, not to separate him from consciousness.
 

Kev22

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
4,089
0
Plain City, OH
Visit site
This was not a charge.

That's funny, the refs in charge of the game seem to think differently. Scott received a 5 minute match penalty for charging. I think you better pump the brakes on this one, you are clearly wrong on this. Scott isn't even very good at being a goon. He does this kind of crap when none of the other teams "fighters" are on the ice. I believe that Lucic, Chara and Thornton were all on the bench. Pretty gutless if you ask me.
 

SuperGenius

For Duty & Humanity!
Mar 18, 2008
4,639
199
He drives it through Eriksson's chest. His shoulder is what makes contact with Eriksson's head.

This was not a charge, a late hit, an elbow, nor a targetted headshot. It's a clean body-check with an unfortunate outcome.

An important detail that you are missing is that the puck was long gone when this hit occurred. It was a dirty, late hit.

More important that John Scott's actions, IMO, is: why is he on the ice in a 4-2 game?

video:
[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Buffalo @ Eastern Michigan
    Buffalo @ Eastern Michigan
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $766.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Ohio @ Toledo
    Ohio @ Toledo
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $550.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad