5th Line Fanatic
Registered User
- Oct 2, 2020
- 776
- 971
Actually, they are. And, KJ isn't a 70 point winger. He's currently a 40 point winger.70+ point potential wingers are not a dime a dozen
Actually, they are. And, KJ isn't a 70 point winger. He's currently a 40 point winger.70+ point potential wingers are not a dime a dozen
Look at what he's doing on the ice, not where he's lined up on faceoffs.I wouldn't go long term on a winger until we have our center ice positions settled. 6'1" 178 lb wingers are a dime a dozen. Give him a bridge deal, I have no fear of losing him.
When he starts playing Center, I'm open to changing my mind.He's closer to Datsyuk (a center) than he is to a dime a dozen winger.
Good thing I said potential then.Actually, they are. And, KJ isn't a 70 point winger. He's currently a 40 point winger.
He's closer to Datsyuk (a center) than he is to a dime a dozen winger.
Id say, if he isn’t a center, then he is closest to Gaudreau and we already have one of those.
I'll take two.
KJ may be a winger but his game isn’t just based around being a winger. He can do everything. You can’t be too fixated on “center” or “winger.” Just keep great hockey playersTwo would be nice, but you can only use so much of the cap for wingers.
Correct, and I'm not locking up a long term multi-million dollar winger on potential. Prove it son, then we'll pay you. You wanna walk, fine. We'll go get Timo Meier or someone like him who has proved it for pennies on the dollar. Wingers are easy to get. Centers are not.Good thing I said potential then.
Pennies on the dollar? Didn’t he just sign a 8 year 8.8 per contract? KJ will be a better player than Meier and will make less if they sign him next summerCorrect, and I'm not locking up a long term multi-million dollar winger on potential. Prove it son, then we'll pay you. You wanna walk, fine. We'll go get Timo Meier or someone like him who has proved it for pennies on the dollar. Wingers are easy to get. Centers are not.
I'm not sure what your point is. We traded a franchise winger for Dubinsky. I'd love to have a winger like Kane too.Patrick Kane is a winger. Brandon Dubinsky is a center.
They gave up squat to get him. Paid big to sign him after he had proved his value and they are set at Center.Pennies on the dollar? Didn’t he just sign a 8 year 8.8 per contract? KJ will be a better player than Meier and will make less if they sign him next summer
I’d argue that the goaltender is the least important part. Vasilevskiy is the only truly elite goalie to win the Cup in the last decade, and some of them have been mediocre goalies who got hot behind a hit team at exactly the right time (Hill, Binnington, and Kuemper come to mind). The Blackhawks and Pens dynasties weren’t built on goaltending, either.I think the way many GMs think and the way narrative has been in recent years is that you need to have a strong number one center (or two), an elite number one defenseman and an elite goalie when building the team.
I think that because of those pieces get paid the big bucks that you can actually build a ”sneaky good” lineup when investing on good play driving wingers, deep d-core rather than top guys (maybe with specialists; no need for same guys playing PP and PK) and a good goalie tandem rather than a Vezina level starter.
I think the way many GMs think and the way narrative has been in recent years is that you need to have a strong number one center (or two), an elite number one defenseman and an elite goalie when building the team.
I think that because of those pieces get paid the big bucks that you can actually build a ”sneaky good” lineup when investing on good play driving wingers, deep d-core rather than top guys (maybe with specialists; no need for same guys playing PP and PK) and a good goalie tandem rather than a Vezina level starter.
There is no way that you’re going to be able to build a competitive roster unless you take some risk with signing some young talents to longer (=cheaper) deals in time. If KJ shows progress this year, lock him down for multiple years. That’s how you might afford to fill the holes in the line-up that are missing. KJ is only going to become more expensive as time goes on and he’ll still be on the team.I think you need solid centers including one really good one and defense that can hold leads and shut down the other team when needed. I am hoping we have the guys that develop into centers. I don’t see us building a defense than can hold leads. If we had 4 guys that could play defense well plus Boqvist and some of the other Bs like Blanks and Berni, I’d feel pretty good about our direction. Once you have your centers and a competent defense then you can look to splurge on wings.
Sometimes GMs need to take a gamble on a player to keep everyone together. Going long term on a guy like KJ might look suspicious at first, but 8x8 in 4 years will be chump change if the cap rises as expected and that will be a below market value as long as he's producing 70ish pts. Otherwise, you're going to overpay and you'll never be able to keep all the talent we have coming up.I'm not sure what your point is. We traded a franchise winger for Dubinsky. I'd love to have a winger like Kane too.
They gave up squat to get him. Paid big to sign him after he had proved his value and they are set at Center.
I'm not saying take KJ out and shoot him. I'm saying prove it son and then we'll pay you big bucks.
I hear your point. If this was an org that was loaded down the middle and on D, sure by all means take a shot on a young winger. But, we are not an org like that. We've won jack squat with the current group. In three years we might find out we don't want to keep them all together.Sometimes GMs need to take a gamble on a player to keep everyone together. Going long term on a guy like KJ might look suspicious at first, but 8x8 in 4 years will be chump change if the cap rises as expected and that will be a below market value as long as he's producing 70ish pts. Otherwise, you're going to overpay and you'll never be able to keep all the talent we have coming up.
I’d add Bgoodbranson to that listthey need to move at least two of the B-name defensemen
Boqvist
Bean
Berni
Blankenburg
Bpeeke
That has been our standard thinking for several months now. (Although from your list, technically Berni doesn't need to be moved."they need to move at least two of the B-name defensemen
Boqvist
Bean
Berni
Blankenburg
Bpeeke
clear oversight on my part, revised list below:I’d add Bgoodbranson to that list
Just a side note...expect KJ's contract to be similar next year.
I wouldn't go long term on a winger until we have our center ice positions settled. 6'1" 178 lb wingers are a dime a dozen. Give him a bridge deal, I have no fear of losing him.
I agree 100%You go longterm with KJ.
Need that Devils model rather than bridge model