To be clear, you’re saying that should he determine Kuraly is a deserving assistant captain, that Babcock should be relieved for his head coaching duties?
I think it would be a bad decision and legitimately will not happen. It was a chance to use a -what I would consider long standing- “joke” about blaming and firing the coach for anything and everything. If he gives Kuraly a letter, I guess that will prove I’m wrong about Kuraly. We’ll see.
I have no idea why he would dislike Kuraly. I still don't even know why you dislike Kuraly. He's a meat and potatoes player, there's not much to like or dislike there. For the last two years he's taken most of the team's D zone faceoffs, not an easy job.
It’s really nothing at all about the faceoffs or his “style”, although he really doesn’t seem to actually be very good at faceoffs and I don’t like his defensive “awareness” and overall work in the defensive zone AT ALL. Where I look at Jenner as “undermanned” in this regard, I look at Kuraly as part of the problem. I don’t think he is what we thought he was and what he’s mostly perceived to be. I quite simply think he’s not a good hockey player.
I’ve made numerous comments during/after games pointing out questionable actions and “body language” from Kuraly, that is noticeable during games. Essentially “showing up” other players (imo) and in many cases he is just as, if not MORE, at fault for the goals scored, when most of these things are noticeable. I wish I could see the games in person and not just during tv broadcasts, yet these things are still there to see.
Many people say I’m delusional or making a big thing out of nothing, and that’s fine. I simply disagree. It’s a consistent thing I’ve see from him and I’m sorry if others don’t see it. There’s a “vibe” there I really don’t like regarding his on ice interactions with teammates while things are going bad.
I also stand by the idea that’s there’s more (or “were”) issues/problems behind the comments of Gudbranson and Werenski regarding issues at practice and “raising the standard”, that have nothing to do with Brad Larsen. Like there’s an issue, yet nobody can really admit it or talk about it honestly in any way. Nothing can be corrected in this way.
I mean, really?? “His inability to stay on his feet”?? Come on. Foudy is a 1st round draft pick who was literally picked there due to his skating ability. Give him some time to add some strength. Look at your boy Bambi Jiricek. Hell, Foudy can get knocked down and get up and he’ll still get somewhere before Peeke gets there. Foudy skates, shoots, and most importantly, reads the ice, better than every “lower lineup veteran”.And why would Foudy be preferred? I don't know. Maybe Babcock sees him as a guy who could take advantage of the stretch pass, though that would be on the wing. I personally don't see Foudy having the skills. Even compared to Kuraly, Foudy's inability to stay on his feet is a problem.
A Roslovic that cuts out the blind passes, scores a little more consistently, and pays a bit more attention defensively, would be a valuable player. We could use a guy like that!
Right, a Roslovic that does everything Roslovic doesn’t do.
Bean’s injuries have clouded much of the perception of him as a player. He has looked like the best PP “QB” at times, over both Boqvist and Werenski. Also, seems like his defense judged harshly when playing higher in the lineup, whereas “Pirouette Peeke” is excused…Don't tell bus this part but I don't see much of a gap, if any, between Christiansen and Bean.
Last edited: