Speculation: Armchair GM 2024-25 Season, Craig Conroy's Can Do Calgary Flames

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
That's not at all what's happening. It's not a retool, it is actually a slow rolling natural rebuild.

Backlund- 36- 1 year remaining
Kadri- 35- 3 years remaining
Huberdeau- 32- 3 years remaining
Coleman- 34- 2 years remaining
Weegar- 31- 3 years remaining

Outside of Huberdeau and Weegar, the bulk of these guys are going to start to decline, possibly as early as next year. The contracts drop off each year.

Could a couple of these guys be replaced by what we currently have coming up? Yes, but in the top 6, our future talent is sketchy, at best. We're restocking the bottom half of our roster right now and hoping to get luck with a few top half guys along the way. Parekh could be a 1D, Coronato could be a top line RW and Wolf might be a great starter but outside of that, the top tier is lacking. In a couple of years we will be making these top 5 picks but the rebuild is 5 years away from being completed. This year is an anomaly.

If we have to pick a draft we have an anomaly at least it's this year not next potentially.
 
Hear me out. We offer sheet Rossi :naughty:

Unfortunately I think at the number we’d have to hit for the Wild to not match we’d be giving up too much draft capital for a team that’s not certain to be drafting late. Love the player though
 
And what is an honest rebuild? This team was never going to draft top 5 without a burn it to the ground one. You would have to get rid of Kadri, Hube, Weegar, Ras, Backs, Coleman and Wolf for that. Then you are hoping you luck into a generational talent. or you just spend years spinning your wheels like Edmonton, Buffalo, Florida, Detroit, etc. Ownership was never going to go for that. The plan was to be competitive by 2027, they are on track for that. This was 3-4 year retool, not a rebuild.
They may be on track to be perennially competing for the 2nd wildcard (status quo same old Flames),
they are NOT on track to be true long term playoff contenders which needs them to change things up and actually step back from competing for the wildcard slots and accumulate picks and prospects to create and build sustainable depth throughout the organization. 1 year doesn't do that and acquiring 25 YO players may accelerates the timeline but it will actually shorten the window.
I am not necessarily saying tear it down, I am saying that right now the team should be open to trading any player over 30 IF the offers received exceed expectations AND they need to hold the line on term when extending 29/30 YO players (ie 5 yrs or less)
 
Hear me out. We offer sheet Rossi :naughty:

Unfortunately I think at the number we’d have to hit for the Wild to not match we’d be giving up too much draft capital for a team that’s not certain to be drafting late. Love the player though

If we are outperforming expectations this year, then next year is risky if we fall back down to expectations. I dunno if it's wise to OS Rossi. It could potentially end up a situation where the picks sent for him are too valuable vs his value.
 
No we won't.

A 95.5m cap would have a floor of about 68m. We already have 58.36m committed to next year with Zary, Frost and Coronato as RFAs and would still need to sign (or promote) a goalie and another 4-5 skaters.

With only paying those 5 signings league min (they won't) and going with just a 22-man roster we'd only have to pay Zary, Frost and Coronato a combined 4-6m to reach the floor.

And the following year we have Wolf and Andersson up for new deals so reaching a floor of ~73m won't be an issue.
If the cap goes up to 95.5 next year the cap floor will be 15% less than the midpoint. To calculate the floor divide the ceiling by 1.15 to get the midpoint, then multiply that number by 0.85. Therefore the floor will be ~70.6M

For a 104M cap the floor will be ~76.1M, and for 113.5M, the floor will be ~83.9M
 
If we are outperforming expectations this year, then next year is risky if we fall back down to expectations. I dunno if it's wise to OS Rossi. It could potentially end up a situation where the picks sent for him are too valuable vs his value.

This is where I’m at too. Though it is worth noting we’re not really outperforming expectations based on how the team is playing. Goaltending is good but finishing is awful. We’re kind of right where we should be

We’re outperforming expectations based on how we all saw the roster this year. But I agree and think overall it’s probably too risky to make an offer sheet at a level we’d lose first round picks when guys like Kadri/Backlund/Coleman are poised to fall off

Even though I think Rossi is the kind of piece this team could desperately need
 
  • Like
Reactions: Figgy44
And what is an honest rebuild? This team was never going to draft top 5 without a burn it to the ground one. You would have to get rid of Kadri, Hube, Weegar, Ras, Backs, Coleman and Wolf for that. Then you are hoping you luck into a generational talent. or you just spend years spinning your wheels like Edmonton, Buffalo, Florida, Detroit, etc. Ownership was never going to go for that. The plan was to be competitive by 2027, they are on track for that. This was 3-4 year retool, not a rebuild.
I don't agree with that, I doubt anyone thought Wolf was going to get Vezina votes in his rookie season. Without his play this team would easily be bottom 5.
 
People also forget that players get old. Remember the guys that were still on the roster when we were picking 6th, 4th and 6th OA the last time? Not every single player needs to be moved out, in order to bottom out.
 
If the cap goes up to 95.5 next year the cap floor will be 15% less than the midpoint. To calculate the floor divide the ceiling by 1.15 to get the midpoint, then multiply that number by 0.85. Therefore the floor will be ~70.6M

For a 104M cap the floor will be ~76.1M, and for 113.5M, the floor will be ~83.9M
I just ballparked it without a calculator. But I also forgot Bahl in my list of guys that need a contract. So my point about not having difficulty reaching the floor stands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ledge And Dairy
Expected goals is not goals though. This team lacks finish and high end offensive skill. They will have to get more chances than most teams to score.

They still need an elite scorer or two to be truly competitive. Or else this team is trending towards the early 2004 version. An okay team with a great goalie.
Honestly this is turning in to a cop out answer. Huberdeau looks like he will pot 30 this year. Coronato is a plus goal scorer with room to grow. Sharangovich has a top notch shot and Kadri is a proven goal scorer. We just have a lot of offensive players getting hurt by percentages. All of Zary, Sharangovich, and Kadri are bottom 25 forwards in terms of on ice shooting percentage this season, getting worse results than the average 4th liner. Smart money would’ve had them as 3 of our top 5 scorers this year, so that’s some bug names getting hurt by poor luck. People have been recognizing Zary as “snake bit” because he’s one of our young up and comers, but it applies equally to the other 2 as well.

We’ve been roughly 20th in offense since the start of December, with some of our best goal scorers hurt/snakebit throughout the year and we just added two offensive minded players to replace less skilled guys in the top 9. We obviously still have to add to our forward group long term, but this is no longer bad offensive group:

Huberdeau-Kadri-Farabee
Coleman-Backlund-Coronato
Zary-Frost-Rango

Only 2 of those players aren’t at or around a 20 goal pace, and that’s with some career worst percentages for some of those players.
 
Last edited:
I don't agree with that, I doubt anyone thought Wolf was going to get Vezina votes in his rookie season. Without his play this team would easily be bottom 5.
“Easily bottom 5”

Points percentage: 15th
Corsi: 10th
Fenwick: 11th
Shots for: 12th
Shots against: 20th
Goals for: 28th
Goals against: 15th
xGF: 18th
xGA: 19th
Scoring chances: 14th
Scoring chance against: 24th
High danger chances: 19th
High danger chances against: 21st

I could go for years. Only bottom 5 stats we have are goals for which since December 1st is 22nd, and PK which is also 22nd over that time frame. Your claim is systematically, categorically, and demonstrably false, and just rooted in a lot of strong opinions people had this offseason that were proven very wrong. Wolf makes us a lot better, but not that much better.
 
Honestly this is turning in to a cop out answer. Huberdeau looks like he will pot 30 this year. Coronato is a plus goal scorer with room to grow. Sharangovich has a top notch shot and Kadri is a proven goal scorer. We just have a lot of offensive players getting hurt by percentages. All of Zary, Sharangovich, and Kadri are bottom 25 forwards in terms of on ice shooting percentage this season, getting worse results than the average 4th liner. Smart money would’ve had them as 3 of our top 5 scorers this year, so that’s some bug names getting hurt by poor luck. People have been recognizing Zary as “snake bit” because he’s one of our young up and comers, but it applies equally to the other 2 as well.

We’ve been roughly 20th in offense since the start of December, with some of our best goal scorers hurt/snakebit throughout the year and we just added two offensive minded players to replace less skilled guys in the top 9. We obviously still have to add to our forward group long term, but this is no longer bad offensive group:

Huberdeau-Kadri-Farabee
Coleman-Backlund-Coronato
Zary-Frost-Rango

Only 2 of those players aren’t at or around a 20 goal pace, and that’s with some career worst percentages for some of those players.
Going by what I saw out of Frosty in these first two games, I’d put him with our natural shooters Coro and Rango, and slide Farabee into Coro’s old spot with Backs and Coleman. Pospy has already played with Naz and Huby at various points this season, so slide him in there again, and bump him to 4C/RW when Zary gets back.
 
Going by what I saw out of Frosty in these first two games, I’d put him with our natural shooters Coro and Rango, and slide Farabee into Coro’s old spot with Backs and Coleman. Pospy has already played with Naz and Huby at various points this season, so slide him in there again, and bump him to 4C/RW when Zary gets back.

Juggling the lines for a 2A, 2B, 2C type of top 9 scenario makes sense.

Farabee learning from Coleman makes sense on paper. Lots of similarities there even though there's a few distinct differences as well.

Frost immediately being slotted to play with shooters though, I'm not sure about that yet. I don't know how else that might look like though. Keep in mind he's intentionally had very little instructions on the system so far. Maybe you're right and Huska goes in that direction. But I feel like there's a different path they might use to try and ease him in vs throwing a line together to see if it takes off. Especially since Frost is in a contract year. No point in boosting his raw points total for a role that might not be his permanent role in Calgary and cause him to sign a contract that would quickly be an overpay once he is revised into more of a two way role.

But either way, I trust what Huska has planned for him.
 
Everybody is putting up good arguments in support of our latest playoff quest and Conroy's latest statement that Andersson, Kadri, and Weegar are untouchable. However I'm still not convinced the most recent direction Conry is taking the team is the right direction. I just don't see the team having playoff success without one or two elite impact players and its my belief that the draft is the only way we can acquire them. I'm sorry if some of you believe trading Andersson and/or Kadri and limiting the number of games that Wolf plays, to 15 more, is sending the wrong message but its my belief that any short term pain will be more than made up for by the ling term gain we achieve through the draft.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad