If I recall from last year, whenever Plain Jane shows up to start a game thread, we almost always lose.
Thanks Jets 31, you closet tanker!!
You, sir, are committing slander! I recall Plain Jane was quite successful until some cranky office worker complained about sexism. True, we didn't have a perfect record with Jane but even in games we didn't win at least we put the puck in the net a few times.If I recall from last year, whenever Plain Jane shows up to start a game thread, we almost always lose.
Thanks Jets 31, you closet tanker!!
Assuming you mean me, it's not a sign of anything. I was busy with a a job interview.
No slight against Jane but I'd rather see the promised speedo.
Seems like a few teams that traded guys who wanted to be traded are playing better. This is the time of year when playing for pride seems to matter. Only a few teams are deliberately tanking for more lottery balls now.
If this board turns into a tradeoff of speedos and bikinis it will be an exclusive one, maybe a little too inviting...Personally I have a thing for librarians, takes more imagination. Maybe it's the glasses...
How did it go? (And I mean the interview, not the mod's speedo.)
It was pretty bizarre. I've got a seminar at 2 and really need some food. I'll dish you all the dirt later.
Myself I am a fan of the 11 forward 7 defensemen lineup, because the coaches have to be dialed in to manage the bench, and the players have to be dialed in because the lines aren't just rolling over to special teams situations. Variance in matchups also makes a team less predictable.
Or the Arizona fluky streak of backup goalies comes to a screeching halt. The guy is a below 0.900 SV% AHL guy over the last 4 years (125 games). Before this season his call ups to the NHL had him at 3 games for a .824 SV% and 3 games for a .875 SV%. Small sample sizes eventually meet the real world.
Splendid. I'm sure more than just Ginger, Jetson and I will look forward to it. And like Ginger, I hope you get the job.
