your saying berggren best case is keller...so why would you make the trade for keller when you already have his ability on the team? Why wouldn't you just want both?He’s an above PPG 1st liner, we have 0 of them. Berggrens absolute best case is Keller, his likey case is a 60pt guy, Johansson will be a #4, and the 1st can be anything. Would you do a 2nd line winger + #4D + 1st for an elite 1st line winger? I would.
6 months younger is laughable attempt at using "younger" as an argument.How is this brutal for Ott ? Ott is getting the younger better player in Keller.
I would rather have Keller over DeBrincat period and i think there would be a few other posters that would to but ya that's because we are Bias.6 months younger is laughable attempt at using "younger" as an argument.
Also better? Over the last 4 years Keller has 96 goals and 227 points in 274 games. DeBrincat has 118 goals and 245 points in 285 games. If we go with a 3 year window the difference in points per game is still roughly the same. This season is literally the only season in both players NHL careers where Keller has out produced DeBrincat since their rookie years and the difference is one player was moved to a brand new team and the other wasn't.
Now I am not taking shots at Keller but its mind blowing how much recency bias effects peoples perspectives
Someone is just gonna sign DeBrincat as a UFA anyways... No need to trade for himThat's a brutal trade for Ottawa. Detroit getting a 1st line winger for a mid 1st and a reclamation project is hilarious too
We don’t have his ability on the team. We have a guy in Berggren who has a n extremely low chance to become somehting like him.your saying berggren best case is keller...so why would you make the trade for keller when you already have his ability on the team? Why wouldn't you just want both?
Ogee's makes more sense, although I still think it is a lot to give, but I would still do it.
You are more than welcome to prefer one over the other as they are pretty similar caliber players from the same draft year. Just don't make dumb comments about one being "younger and better" because that is negligible and debatable respectivelyI would rather have Keller over DeBrincat period and i think there would be a few other posters that would to but ya that's because we are Bias.
As a Yotes fan, i agreeARI might as well fold the team if they entertain trading Keller
Was it that long ago since they were in the Western Conference finals ?The Coyotes 30 year rebuild continues
Doans been gone that long?Arizona hasn't had a first line anything in nearly 10 years if you wanna be generous. He's not going anywhere
We'll find out next year, when Connor Bedard and Logan Cooley both join Kells in the Coyotes top 6.Imagine what Keller could do in a good team with good partners.
As soon as Detroit fans stop making trade threads about our best players.At what point will Coyotes stop selling every good player they have as they enter their primes and actually build a hockey team for their prospects to develop within?
Coyotes were in the playoffs three seasons ago.The Coyotes 30 year rebuild continues
I agree that Fiala.and Keller are close in value, but at the same time, I don't know if there's a general manager that takes Fiala over Keller. He does more with less and I think he'd demand more than what Fiala got.The funny thing about off-season trades is players usually go for less than people on this board think they will.
Look at Fiala. Faber + a 1st. That is the quality of player Keller is and that’s his ballpark value.
2 1sts, a potential 2nd and 2 young players that might only need a fresh start is a solid trade.
No.lets say Habs pick #5/6 + prospect would that be enough for Keller?
trade Florida's pick + for Dubois
Dubois - Suzuki - Keller
Slafkovsky - Dach - Caufield