Are the Toronto Maple Leafs Stanley Cup contenders?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,217
3,353
Laval, Qc
Let me explain to you. It's not that complicated.

They can send down the 2 extra defensemen they got against from their cap + Reaves on LTIR + send a forward down - this is the same composition they started the year with.

That brings them over 4M in cap space. The reason they're not doing that is there is no benefit to doing that right now because they didn't acquire a 4M player to replace Klingberg.
Which 2 dmen ?

Lagesson and Benoit will save them $1.55M. Adding that to $1.2M (with Reaves on LTIR) brings the cap space to $2.75, far from the $4M that you mentioned.

Sending McMann down bring them to $3.6M...

You're right (but also wrong), it's not complicated...
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,161
13,330
Which 2 dmen ?

Lagesson and Benoit will save them $1.55M. Adding that to $1.2M (with Reaves on LTIR) brings the cap space to $2.75, far from the $4M that you mentioned.

You're right (but also wrong), it's not complicated...

Here - let me break it down for you:

Leafs add Reaves to LTIR + 1.35M
Leafs send down Robertson (they did this at the start of the year too) + 800K
Leafs send down Benoit and Lagesson + 1.55M OR Lagesson + McMann (more likely choice as they'll likely want to keep Benoit)

1.35 + 800K + 1.55M = 3.7M.

Now, that's just to put the Leafs in the position they started. Leafs can also send down Samsonov (like they have already done) to save another +500K vs. Hildeby.

In addition to that, assuming the Leafs acquire a player - which they would have to if they wanted to use the cap space - they would send down an additional player over the player they acquired.

What part are you getting confused by?
 

Turin

Erik Karlsson is good
Feb 27, 2018
23,648
27,796
They are predictably worse defensively after losing Bunting, Kerfoot, Holl, Acciari and ROR but yeesh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habsrule

The Grim Reaper

Registered User
Apr 18, 2017
10,804
14,491
Hobart, Tasmania
They haven't been a contender since they mistook a gaping whole in defense and goaltending for a need to sign Tavares to a ridiculous contract. They missed their window with the ELC for the star players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eojsmada

The Panther

Registered User
Mar 25, 2014
19,843
16,758
Tokyo, Japan
For the defense:

The Leafs have a solid top-six, and are really good at getting to the overtime.

For the prosecution:

The Leafs' ranking in regulation wins in the Eastern Conference:
13. Toronto
14. Ottawa
15. Columbus
16. Montreal
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,161
13,330
For the defense:

The Leafs have a solid top-six, and are really good at getting to the overtime.

For the prosecution:

The Leafs' ranking in regulation wins in the Eastern Conference:
13. Toronto
14. Ottawa
15. Columbus
16. Montreal

How do people talk about regulation wins and ignore regulation losses?

For some reason, the Leafs not being good at 3v3 OT is a knock against the Leafs even though it doesn't exist in the playoffs.

Teams with less regulation losses than the Leafs in the East:

1.) Boston

That's it. That's the list.
 

Mad Dog Tannen

Registered User
Apr 10, 2010
4,984
2,724
Can you imagine if they miss the playoffs, the anarchy that would ensue? They've still got games in hand but they're checking over their shoulder now. Might have to revisit this thread in a couple weeks...
When the leafs and kings both miss the playoffs we should have a reverse Stanley cup final for them.

Start each team with a 2-0 lead and rotate the leads between the teams. First team to blow 4 leads wins the reverse Stanley cup.

We have to make them think they need to win though, so secrecy will be important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive

mkatcherin00

Registered User
Apr 2, 2023
10,683
10,414
How do people talk about regulation wins and ignore regulation losses?

For some reason, the Leafs not being good at 3v3 OT is a knock against the Leafs even though it doesn't exist in the playoffs.

Teams with less regulation losses than the Leafs in the East:

1.) Boston

That's it. That's the list.
Because regulation

Guess what? Playoff OT is 5 on 5 too

If a team cannot get it done in reg before garys circus clown show, how good can they be in the playoffs? Reg wins i sa good measure how good a team is

If a team had 5 reg wins and 15 OT wins and 5 losses, ya they would be 20-5, but everybody would say how bad they are that they had to win 15 in circus time
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,161
13,330
Because regulation

Guess what? Playoff OT is 5 on 5 too

If a team cannot get it done in reg before garys circus clown show, how good can they be in the playoffs? Reg wins i sa good measure how good a team is

If a team had 5 reg wins and 15 OT wins and 5 losses, ya they would be 20-5, but everybody would say how bad they are that they had to win 15 in circus time

What are you talking about? Florida beat the top 3 teams in the East in regulation wins last season (Toronto, Carolina, Boston). Florida had the least regulation wins in the East.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafsNation75

josra33

Registered User
Aug 11, 2008
5,347
5,056
I mean the caps didnt win shit really from 2008 to 2017

Then it comes together in 2018

They moved on from semi core pieces in Varlamov, Green, Semin

Leafs did that in Kadri, Andersen, Hyman

I dont expect this core to win, but the 2018 caps are the only hope I have.

Eveything clicked, they won a cup, then went back to choking after warda


You guys barely beat an above average team then?

Was a close game, and leafs ended up losing.

Avs get credit for winning, but they went down to this same barely above avg team 3-0
If games were only 40 minutes then sure you have a point. Hockey is a 60 minute game. Doesn’t matter if you’re up in 40 minutes if you’re down at the 60 minute mark.
 

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,217
3,353
Laval, Qc
Here - let me break it down for you:

Leafs add Reaves to LTIR + 1.35M
Leafs send down Robertson (they did this at the start of the year too) + 800K
Leafs send down Benoit and Lagesson + 1.55M OR Lagesson + McMann (more likely choice as they'll likely want to keep Benoit)

1.35 + 800K + 1.55M = 3.7M.

Now, that's just to put the Leafs in the position they started. Leafs can also send down Samsonov (like they have already done) to save another +500K vs. Hildeby.

In addition to that, assuming the Leafs acquire a player - which they would have to if they wanted to use the cap space - they would send down an additional player over the player they acquired.

What part are you getting confused by?
Nice try, but if they sent down Robertson and McMann, they would only have 11 forwards on the roster.

And you really think running a 20-player roster is a wise thing to do ?
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,161
13,330
Nice try, but if they sent down Robertson and McMann, they would only have 11 forwards on the roster.

And you really think running a 20-player roster is a wise thing to do ?

The Leafs literally started a season with a 20-man roster.

Also, they would be adding a player wouldn't they? How else are they going to use the cap space?

There's no cap in the playoffs - they would need need a 20 man roster until the playoffs. They had a 20 man roster until Klingberg got injured but now it's not possible? It makes no sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafsNation75

mkatcherin00

Registered User
Apr 2, 2023
10,683
10,414
What are you talking about? Florida beat the top 3 teams in the East in regulation wins last season (Toronto, Carolina, Boston). Florida had the least regulation wins in the East.
Where is your Bob? You guys said you got goalied hard. Goalies can tilt a series
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,161
13,330
Where is your Bob? You guys said you got goalied hard. Goalies can tilt a series

So regulation wins aren't so important I guess.

Boston had the current Vezina winner and lead the league in regulation wins. They lost to the team with the least number of regulation wins and Bob wasn't even good that series nor did he play the majority of the games.

Regulation games seems like a new trend this season. The last 2 seasons when the Leafs were top 3 in regulation wins (in the entire league) - no one cared.
 

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,217
3,353
Laval, Qc
The Leafs literally started a season with a 20-man roster.

Also, they would be adding a player wouldn't they? How else are they going to use the cap space?

There's no cap in the playoffs - they would need need a 20 man roster until the playoffs. They had a 20 man roster until Klingberg got injured but now it's not possible? It makes no sense.
And you really think that was a wise move ?

Or was it a move forced upon them by the lack of cap space ?
 

DelZottoHitTheNetJK

Registered User
Mar 10, 2011
2,163
1,690
For the defense:

The Leafs have a solid top-six, and are really good at getting to the overtime.

For the prosecution:

The Leafs' ranking in regulation wins in the Eastern Conference:
13. Toronto
14. Ottawa
15. Columbus
16. Montreal

A solid top six completely overshadowed by the gaping black hole on their bottom two pairs and in net*

Fixed it
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,161
13,330
And you really think that was a wise move ?

Or was it a move forced upon them by the lack of cap space ?

Yes, it's a wise move. You can only dress 20 players. It doesn't impact the game unless you get a player that's injured short-term in which case you play shorthanded in a game, no different than an in-game injury.

Like I said, the Leafs have the cap space. You're arguing that it's not wise. That's your opinion - that doesn't change the fact it's possible. Stop moving the goalposts.

The argument was never what you thought was wise - it was do they have the cap space? And we've both agreed on yes.
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
37,528
18,463
Well they are learning with Samsonov. We won't be seeing him.

A lot seems to be hinging on Woll. If he comes back and sparks a hot streak the feeling around them may flip the other way. Is that too much to expect?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,217
3,353
Laval, Qc
Yes, it's a wise move. You can only dress 20 players.
If that's the case, why aren't there more teams doing it ?

Well they are learning with Samsonov. We won't be seeing him.

A lot seems to be hinging on Woll. If he comes back and sparks a hot streak the feeling around them may flip the other way. Is that too much to expect?
Woll is often injured...
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,161
13,330
If that's the case, why aren't there more teams doing it ?

Lots of teams did it. Edmonton was doing it before they sent Campbell down. Ottawa was also doing it before injuries.

Why wouldn't you use the cap to your advantage?

At least you agree the Leafs have the cap space. I don't know how you thought Klingberg fit into the cap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad