tarheelhockey
Offside Review Specialist
Wilson as in Tom Wilson? That would be quite the stupid pick. With IIHF rules, he is a net negative, IMO.
Allow me to introduce you to the history of Team Canada
Wilson as in Tom Wilson? That would be quite the stupid pick. With IIHF rules, he is a net negative, IMO.
Allow me to introduce you to the history of Team Canada
Stammer is a lock.
Don't really care about JT
I think it's a game of inches thing. I could counter with JT's insane faceoff percentage.
You are now basically presenting a new case,so now it's because he's right handed and more of a goal scorer? That might work out but considering the huge number of factors they will have to take into consideration it could go several ways. I'm not going to add up all the right handed shots but if you figure that and Stamkos's extra goal this year will be all the difference I won't argue with you, but it doesn't sound very decisive to me.
Career average of 52.3% is considered insane? Or are you just using recency bias? By comparison Crosby's career average is 52%, Stamkos 49.8%, ROR 55.7%, Bergeron 57.5%
So JT is about on par with Sid, slightly ahead of Stamkos...but behind ROR and Bergeron. So does he make team Canada? I think he definitely does, but it's not because of his "insane faceoff percentage"
Career average of 52.3% is considered insane? Or are you just using recency bias? By comparison Crosby's career average is 52%, Stamkos 49.8%, ROR 55.7%, Bergeron 57.5%
So JT is about on par with Sid, slightly ahead of Stamkos...but behind ROR and Bergeron. So does he make team Canada? I think he definitely does, but it's not because of his "insane faceoff percentage"
Sure about that? 2010/11 he was 52.54% Didn't get above 52% again until 2014/15, down to 50.61% in 2016/17. Last year he was 55.28% which admittedly looks like his new average. I guarantee that his current 60% is not sustainable. So yes he can be one of the best or he can be average. Tavares is not going to make team Canada because of his FO%. If he makes the team it's because he has other qualities that the management is looking for. If Canada just takes their best 13/14 forwards, then JT is a lock. But Canada always likes to "big brain" things and bring role players at times. Heck, Kunitz played for team Canada simply because he was Sid's line mate in the NHL."Recency bias" is not really a thing with something like faceoff percentage that players can substantially improve over time. How Tavares did as a kid means nothing for his current faceoff prowess.
Not saying that means anything for his chances at being selected though.
Imagine having a pool of players so deep you have to wonder this kind of thing.
Kadri and Barzal make Team Canada ahead of Marner and Tavares.
Hockey Canada are very big on Barzal and Kadri is playing out of his mind this year. One will be the 13th forward while the other plays a shutdown role.
They can bring them both in case ROR drives into another Tim Horton'sYou really think that's gonna happen when the GM of team canada is the same GM as the Blues? Kadri has done nothing in career that holds a candle to what ROR has done.
Wilson as in Tom Wilson? That would be quite the stupid pick. With IIHF rules, he is a net negative, IMO.
Look no further than Pronger during the Turin Olympics. So many unnecessary penalties
They can bring them both in case ROR drives into another Tim Horton's
Seems to be a debate going on currently on tsn where the guys are saying it could come down to Stamkos or Tavares making the team? I think they are both making it, what says you guys?
Wilson before kadri.Why would Canada take Kadri - the guy gets himself suspended in the playoffs every single year.