It was moderately interesting, though unsurprisingly a pretty high level view on what they're doing.
- Use combination of tracking data and event data to model what events lead to reward (goals, shots, xG)
- Explore what different line combinations lead to positive outcomes (I didn't have time to get in a question about how they deal with the general inertia of hockey people and their unwillingness to properly explore this for long enough, but I'm gonna reach out to ask that)
- Analytical team is heavily involved in team building process (to what extend, I don't know, but he did spend a bit of time talking about that)
- Some work on modeling passing lanes (early outcome is that forwards are better at fitting pucks into narrower passing lanes)
Someone in the audience asked what analytically lead to the decision to move away from smaller mobile D-men like Keith, and toward larger shutdown D-men like Vlasic, which I thought was a profoundly stupid question. It did not sound on Radke's response like that was an analytically driven decision.