Speculation: Any interest in Liljegren for a mid round pick?

Deadly Dogma

All I have is substantially vapid opinions
Sponsor
May 3, 2016
8,997
5,317
Well, it would be Edmonton or Colorado's 3rd (we don't have our own).
oh, I wonder if a conditional trade works, say he plays less than 50 games its a 4th, 51-75 1 of the 3rds and if he plays 75-82 its a 2nd?
The way I see it is, if he is playing well enough to play 75+ games then even a 2nd round pick would feel like steal for you guys
 

Deadly Dogma

All I have is substantially vapid opinions
Sponsor
May 3, 2016
8,997
5,317
Absolutely not, nice try. :laugh:

You opened with "mid-round pick", you aren't getting 33rd overall.
I agree but on a performance based conditional trade a 2nd seems a fair price for the max payout if he goes and lights it up
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,601
22,433
Bay Area
I agree but on a performance based conditional trade a 2nd seems a fair price for the max payout if he goes and lights it up
That isn't a performance-based condition, that's a health-based condition. If he's healthy, he'd obviously play every game.

Or how about the later of the 2 3rds or a 4th but SJ gives us 1st dibs on Granlund@50% at the deadline?
We can't retain on Granlund, so some other team would have to be retaining.

If I were Grier I'd be happy to make some kind of future considerations based on if you match another team's best offer, we'd choose you or whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deadly Dogma

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
30,575
19,195
Feels like a team like the Sharks would be all over it. Take the cap hit and get him for basically free.
Why?
oh, I wonder if a conditional trade works, say he plays less than 50 games its a 4th, 51-75 1 of the 3rds and if he plays 75-82 its a 2nd?
The way I see it is, if he is playing well enough to play 75+ games then even a 2nd round pick would feel like steal for you guys
He’s UFA in two years so let’s hold our horses on tanky teams trading away picks to acquire a so so player available for “free” in two years.
 

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
38,641
7,560
Montreal, Quebec
While it wouldn't surprise me if Liljegren got traded at some point since he doesn't seem to be working in Toronto, it certainly won't be this early nor for a 4th or 5th. If anything, it'll be part of a bigger deal for an upgrade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phion Keneuf

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
18,426
28,381
Why?
He’s UFA in two years so let’s hold our horses on tanky teams trading away picks to acquire a so so player available for “free” in two years.

Still young, right handed, hundreds of NHL games showing he is a capable bottom pairing dman but is blocked from developing further.

While it wouldn't surprise me if Liljegren got traded at some point since he doesn't seem to be working in Toronto, it certainly won't be this early nor for a 4th or 5th. If anything, it'll be part of a bigger deal for an upgrade.

I don't see that being likely. Our defense is pretty stuffed as is and really solid. I doubt Lilly helps return a good enough player to actually upgrade the defense.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,015
16,194
I don't know the return but it's delusional to think there aren't teams that would take a chance on him.

A 25 year-old RD with a few years of NHL experience and 2 years on his deal @ 3M? That's a low risk gamble with potentially a decent (but modest) upside for a GM that needs help on the (right side) blueline.
$3m is a lot for an#6-7 D
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
39,856
25,470
Vancouver, BC
Craig Berube on Timothy Liljegren’s camp showing: “Has to do things quicker, be a little heavier in his battles, move pucks quicker, and simplify the game”

Doesn’t sound like a vote of confidence. At 25 and a half years old he probably is pretty much what he is. Ideally he’s on your bottom pair.
 

604

Registered User
Nov 1, 2011
7,375
1,602
Ya I can't imagine we would have signed Barrie if we could have gotten him for a 4th

Cap is meaningless to Calgary

Barrie is a much better player at 1/3 the cost.

I bet the Leafs would take him for Lil right now.

Barrie was available to the whole league for free last week.

So yes, Lil is a cap dump with negative value.
 

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,013
12,172
I'm sure there'd definitely be interest at that price.

Liljegren's contract makes him a little bit of an awkward fit for a deep blueline playoff team...but there are plenty of teams out there who could afford to spend $3M cap (and less cash) on a guy who, on a weaker/less deep blueline, is probably more of a #4/5 tweener RHD and still reasonable young.

He's in that same grey area as Henri Jokiharju imo. Where you really don't want him in your Top-4, but for short stints, he's probably a better option than a lot of other #5/6D. But also doesn't really do anything particularly well...where most playoff teams tend to prefer more of a "defensive specialist PKer" type in those #5/6 roles. And $3M is a lot for a playoff team's #5/6D.


Plenty of teams out there lacking some depth at RHD who could afford to give him a try, where the cap number shouldn't be a a major factor.
 

Rubi

Photographer
Sponsor
Jan 9, 2009
16,092
10,552
Seems like not too long ago Flames, Vegas, and Leafs fans were arguing about who was better... Liljegren, Brannstrom, or Valimaki
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,281
15,714
There could be some interest in Lilegren, if he was making $1m a season.

But that $3m salary is ugly, and has another year to run. So unless the Leafs are willing to take back some salary, he's basically 'immoveable'.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad