Speculation: Any interest in Liljegren for a mid round pick?

Deadly Dogma

All I have is substantially vapid opinions
Sponsor
May 3, 2016
8,997
5,316
Well, it would be Edmonton or Colorado's 3rd (we don't have our own).
oh, I wonder if a conditional trade works, say he plays less than 50 games its a 4th, 51-75 1 of the 3rds and if he plays 75-82 its a 2nd?
The way I see it is, if he is playing well enough to play 75+ games then even a 2nd round pick would feel like steal for you guys
 

Deadly Dogma

All I have is substantially vapid opinions
Sponsor
May 3, 2016
8,997
5,316
Absolutely not, nice try. :laugh:

You opened with "mid-round pick", you aren't getting 33rd overall.
I agree but on a performance based conditional trade a 2nd seems a fair price for the max payout if he goes and lights it up
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,598
22,427
Bay Area
I agree but on a performance based conditional trade a 2nd seems a fair price for the max payout if he goes and lights it up
That isn't a performance-based condition, that's a health-based condition. If he's healthy, he'd obviously play every game.

Or how about the later of the 2 3rds or a 4th but SJ gives us 1st dibs on Granlund@50% at the deadline?
We can't retain on Granlund, so some other team would have to be retaining.

If I were Grier I'd be happy to make some kind of future considerations based on if you match another team's best offer, we'd choose you or whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deadly Dogma

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
30,572
19,195
Feels like a team like the Sharks would be all over it. Take the cap hit and get him for basically free.
Why?
oh, I wonder if a conditional trade works, say he plays less than 50 games its a 4th, 51-75 1 of the 3rds and if he plays 75-82 its a 2nd?
The way I see it is, if he is playing well enough to play 75+ games then even a 2nd round pick would feel like steal for you guys
He’s UFA in two years so let’s hold our horses on tanky teams trading away picks to acquire a so so player available for “free” in two years.
 

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
38,641
7,559
Montreal, Quebec
While it wouldn't surprise me if Liljegren got traded at some point since he doesn't seem to be working in Toronto, it certainly won't be this early nor for a 4th or 5th. If anything, it'll be part of a bigger deal for an upgrade.
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
18,426
28,374
Why?
He’s UFA in two years so let’s hold our horses on tanky teams trading away picks to acquire a so so player available for “free” in two years.

Still young, right handed, hundreds of NHL games showing he is a capable bottom pairing dman but is blocked from developing further.

While it wouldn't surprise me if Liljegren got traded at some point since he doesn't seem to be working in Toronto, it certainly won't be this early nor for a 4th or 5th. If anything, it'll be part of a bigger deal for an upgrade.

I don't see that being likely. Our defense is pretty stuffed as is and really solid. I doubt Lilly helps return a good enough player to actually upgrade the defense.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,015
16,194
I don't know the return but it's delusional to think there aren't teams that would take a chance on him.

A 25 year-old RD with a few years of NHL experience and 2 years on his deal @ 3M? That's a low risk gamble with potentially a decent (but modest) upside for a GM that needs help on the (right side) blueline.
$3m is a lot for an#6-7 D
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
39,856
25,470
Vancouver, BC
Craig Berube on Timothy Liljegren’s camp showing: “Has to do things quicker, be a little heavier in his battles, move pucks quicker, and simplify the game”

Doesn’t sound like a vote of confidence. At 25 and a half years old he probably is pretty much what he is. Ideally he’s on your bottom pair.
 

604

Registered User
Nov 1, 2011
7,375
1,602
Ya I can't imagine we would have signed Barrie if we could have gotten him for a 4th

Cap is meaningless to Calgary

Barrie is a much better player at 1/3 the cost.

I bet the Leafs would take him for Lil right now.

Barrie was available to the whole league for free last week.

So yes, Lil is a cap dump with negative value.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad