Any Chance Crosby Reaches 2000 Points?

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
11,002
7,970
Brampton, ON
I wouldn't bet on it, but it doesn't seem utterly impossible. He needs 401 more points. That's an average of 80 points per season (plus one point). He's 37 and can still produce at above a PPG clip. He works hard to stay in shape and loves hockey.

If he can score over 90 points this season and next season and then 80 three seasons from now, he'll only need to average about 70 in his last two seasons to reach 2000 career points (assuming he plays that long).


Like with Ovechkin and 895/900 career goals, I think reaching 2000 points would be a meaningful accomplishment, but it wouldn't help his all-time ranking that much. Would that be enough to propel him ahead of Lemieux or Orr? I'm sure many wouldn't think so. Some might.
 

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
31,044
13,969
He has a shot if he wants to play for that long.

Too bad Pittsburgh is in no position to contend within the next five years.
 

Crosby2010

Registered User
Mar 4, 2023
1,326
1,184
The Pens missed the playoffs on the last game of the season the last two years. They are a playoff team I think. The way Crosby, Malkin and Letang have played so far this year is impressive. Malkin to me is the key this year, he certainly would be the one that could move the needle as we all know how Crosby will fare. But they are old. Karlsson is old too. There is not much in the cupboard for them. They really need to rely on the old quartet that they have. They are miles from being a contender, three Cups will do that to you eventually, but what I'd like to see him do is make the playoffs. He is tied for 5th with Jagr at 201. The 4 ahead of him are dynasty Oilers. If he had sole possession of 5th, he could have a chance to catch Anderson at 214. That is more likely than 2000. I think after two years he is 5th or 6th all-time in points. He needs two huge years to pass Francis for 5th in the next two years but if he plays three more years he passes Francis. That would leave Gretzky, Jagr, Messier and Howe ahead of him. And that sounds just about right as far as I am concerned.
 

BarnabyJones PI

I'd kindly settle for a tall glass of milk.
I wouldn't bet on it, but it doesn't seem utterly impossible. He needs 401 more points. That's an average of 80 points per season (plus one point). He's 37 and can still produce at above a PPG clip. He works hard to stay in shape and loves hockey.

If he can score over 90 points this season and next season and then 80 three seasons from now, he'll only need to average about 70 in his last two seasons to reach 2000 career points (assuming he plays that long).


Like with Ovechkin and 895/900 career goals, I think reaching 2000 points would be a meaningful accomplishment, but it wouldn't help his all-time ranking that much. Would that be enough to propel him ahead of Lemieux or Orr? I'm sure many wouldn't think so. Some might.
I've been thinking about this since 2019 (or so).

I think he can.

I don't see him as the type to have his sights set on that specific goal though, or motivated to make it harder for McDavid to catch him in that regard. McDavid's ahead of his pace, but he still has to be really good well into his 30s to do so. McDavid's "only" +600 points behind while he's 10 years younger, but Crosby is still racking up 80-90 point seasons.
 
Last edited:

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,535
6,062
Ovechkin created some never say never, but that a whole lot of points for someone with very little left to prove (Thornton and many that hanged around long did not win a cup, money-life problem, etc...)

One way to put it, after his 36 years old season,

Yzerman..: 93
Sakic....: 152
Thornton : 198
Beliveau.: 207 (in only 202 games)
Francis..: 239
Oates....: 294
jagr.....: 322
Messier..: 335
Howe.....: 489


Would 400 pts it be the most ever after Howe ? And by a good amount, if someone can do it, could be him with scoring staying high, but still this would be a lot. Jagr without the KHL probably could have, but he had a freak of nature 6 foot 3 frame and played until he was 45.
 
Last edited:

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
25,651
13,163
Ovechkin created some never say never, but that a whole lot of points for someone with very little left to prove (Thornton and many they hanged around long did not win a cup, money-life problem, etc...)

One way to put it, after his 36 years old season,

Yzerman..: 93
Sakic....: 152
Thornton : 198
Beliveau.: 207 (in only 202 games)
Francis..: 239
Oates....: 294
jagr.....: 322
Messier..: 335
Howe.....: 489


Would 400 pts it be the most ever after Howe ? And by a good amount, if someone can do it, could be him with scoring staying high, but still this would be a lot. Jagr without the KHL probably could have, but he had a freak of nature 6 foot 3 frame and played until he was 45.
Got me curious for Alfredsson as he went til 41, he was 285 points after turning 36.

Not sure he gets there, not sure if will play long enough.
 

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,243
8,788
Regina, Saskatchewan
There's a chance, I just don't think it's a good one. He's going to hit 1800 points but I'm not confident on anything after that. He'll be 39 when he hits 1800. I know he's a fitness freak but he just won't be elite productive more after that. There's only what, 20 PPG seasons after age 36 as is? And what, just like 3 80 point seasons after age 38? Outside Howe it's just not something we've seen even from guys like Sakic or Jagr or Gretzky or Lemieux or Yzerman.

Maybe he plays until 43 and gets there. But I do think he's done after this last contract he signed.
 

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,407
15,499
I'm posting this as statistical trivia (since I don't think career totals are overly informative). But Crosby has the potential to reach a few significant records, even though he'll probably fall short of 2,000 points:

Most assists for a single franchise

1Ray Bourque1,111Bruins
2Wayne Gretzky1,086Oilers
3Steve Yzerman1,063Red Wings
4Mario Lemieux1,033Penguins
5Gordie Howe1,023Red Wings
6Joe Sakic1,016Avalanche
7Sidney Crosby1,007Penguins
8Stan Mikita926Blackhawks
9Nicklas Lidstrom878Red Wings
10Bryan Trottier853Islanders

Most points for a single franchise

1Gordie Howe1,809Red Wings
2Steve Yzerman1,755Red Wings
3Mario Lemieux1,723Penguins
4Wayne Gretzky1,669Oilers
5Joe Sakic1,641Avalanche
6Sidney Crosby1,599Penguins
7Alex Ovechkin1,551Capitals
8Ray Bourque1,506Bruins
9Stan Mikita1,467Blackhawks
10Mike Modano1,374Stars

With 105 assists and 211 points, Crosby would set the all-time record for most assists and points for a single franchise. He probably needs three (relatively) healthy seasons to take both records. (I'll add the obligatory "McDavid could surpass this ten years from now").

(Note - Crosby also ranks 7th in most goals for a franchise. The four players at the top - Ovechkin, Howe, Yzerman, and Lemieux - each scored 690+ times. But Crosby has a good chance of taking 5th place from Sakic, who had 625 for the Avalanche).

Who knows if the Penguins will qualify for the playoffs in the near future. Crosby won't surpass Gretzky, but he would finish 2nd all-time in assists and points for a single franchise with another 6 assists and 15 points.
 
Last edited:

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
30,827
19,576
Athletes are playing longer these days (Brady, LeBron..) It's possible if he stayed healthy and wanted to keep going.
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,119
14,398
Half the threads on the history board are about active players, it feels like.
It's excessive yeah. A lot of jockeying to see where whichever current player fits in for historical comparison. Mainly Crosby, Ovechkin, and McDavid, with some Matthews thrown in. This one is even prediction based.
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
30,827
19,576
It’s interesting the perception that it’s somehow more honorable to retire once no longer a very top player. If someone is willing to give you a job and it’s not a gimmick there’s no reason a player should stop playing. Whether it’s for love of game, for money or legacy. You have the whole rest of your life to not be a pro athlete. I don’t think there’s a particular intersection of age and level of play that a player “should” retire. No shame in being a 42 year old third line player making under $2 million if that’s what you want to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nathaniel Skywalker

ImporterExporter

"You're a boring old man"
Jun 18, 2013
19,218
8,209
Oblivion Express
Nah...I don't think he's going to try to hang on for that long. I think these are probably the last three seasons...

The only thing that could keep him around longer is a legitimate chance to win. He'll finish his career in Pitt (as he should) and I'm hoping Dubas and company can somehow steer us into at least semi contender status, if for no other reason than getting to see Sid play as long as possible.

2000? Nah, injuries robbed him of that unfortunately, and even more importantly, some major hardware.

Pretty neat:

 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,295
16,640
It’s interesting the perception that it’s somehow more honorable to retire once no longer a very top player. If someone is willing to give you a job and it’s not a gimmick there’s no reason a player should stop playing. Whether it’s for love of game, for money or legacy. You have the whole rest of your life to not be a pro athlete. I don’t think there’s a particular intersection of age and level of play that a player “should” retire. No shame in being a 42 year old third line player making under $2 million if that’s what you want to do.

To the bolded....I don't think that's the case?

Some players want to retire while still at the top of their game (Roy, Gretzky) - but as you say, that's an individual choice. I don't have any issue with players staying longer, and I don't really hear negatives about it either from fans or others.

I think it's kind of 'up to a certain point' though.

If Crosby wants to play hockey while age 41 or 42, if he morphs into a ~60 point guy? Sure, no problem.

But I don't think anyone wants to see Crosby hanging on long enough to be a barely ~20 point player who can't even crack an NHL roster.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,295
16,640
Crosby just signed a 2 year contract. So he has at least 3 seasons left. He's scored at a ~93-99 point pace for the past 3 years. It depends how long he plays for of course. 3 years seems a certainty....does he play for 4? 5? 6? more?

He's been super consistent his whole career, so I don't expect a sharp decline from him....so him hitting 70/80+ points consistently even as he ages out doesn't seem unrealistic.

Here are some guesstimates for likelihood he tops 2000 points, and other milestones. I try to take injuries/missed games into account.

If he plays 3 more years:

- 99% chance he tops Francis's 1798 points for #5 all-time (68 point average per year)
- 50% chance he tops Howe's 1850 points for #4 all-time (85 point average per year)
- 5% chance he tops Messier's 1887 points for #3 all-time (97 point average per year)

If he plays 4 more years:

- 99% chance he tops Francis's 1798 points for #5 all-time (51 point average per year)
- 99% chance he tops Howe's 1850 points for #4 all-time (64 point average per year)
- 80% chance he tops Messier's 1887 points for #3 all-time (73 point average per year)
- 50% chance he tops Jagr's 1921 points for #2 all-time (82 point average per year)

If he plays 5 more years:

- 99% chance he tops Francis's 1798 points for #5 all-time (40 point average per year)
- 99% chance he tops Howe's 1850 points for #4 all-time (51 point average per year)
- 99% chance he tops Messier's 1887 points for #3 all-time (59 point average per year)
- 85% chance he tops Jagr's 1921 points for #2 all-time (65 point average per year)
- 35% chance he tops 2000 points (81 point average per year)

If he plays 6 more years:

- 99% chance he tops Francis's 1798 points for #5 all-time (34 point average per year)
- 99% chance he tops Howe's 1850 points for #4 all-time (43 point average per year)
- 99% chance he tops Messier's 1887 points for #3 all-time (49 point average per year)
- 99% chance he tops Jagr's 1921 points for #2 all-time (55 point average per year)
- 50% chance he tops 2000 points (67 point average per year)

Obviously injuries and games missed are unpredictable. He has played in over 95% of his team's games the past 4 seasons though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Panther

The Panther

Registered User
Mar 25, 2014
19,959
16,909
Tokyo, Japan
Yeah, it's always a good look when you see a great player (who plays a long, full career) reach that one season where he can no longer do it -- say, no longer a top-line guy, no longer a top-PP guy -- and then he just retires. The Mike Gartner, Joe Sakic, type of ending. (Maybe Rocket Richard and Steve Yzerman had two seasons like that, but there were injuries and the Lock-Out to contend with.)

It's also great when someone retires (not because of injury) while still in the prime... but that is very rare, as we know.

As @bobholly39 says, I don't really have any issue with players playing well past their primes as long as the team is competitive and the player has a defined, successful role. The role might be as a depth or a 2nd-line scorer-type, and that's fine, as long as he's still contributing.

Bit of a mulligan for some of the 1980s'-guys who lasted into the mid-to-late 1990s. This was the era of big money for veterans, and for guys who'd been making $175,000 in their primes, there was now a pot of $3 or $4 million on the table to survive another year or two. Wihle it didn't always look good on the final career resume, it's quite understandable.
 

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
14,486
19,901
Las Vegas
I doubt it. I don't see Crosby as the type to stay on longer than his abilities permit, and I think once he starts to notably decline, he will step off.


It's becoming the 'Ovechkin / Crosby with some History of Hockey board"...

Eh, is it really that odd for the history board to have threads about 2 active all time greats who are both approaching career milestones/records and have both hit the point in their careers where it's time to look at them retrospectively?

on topic: no for me, I dont see him hanging on like a Marleau just for a milestone
 

ImporterExporter

"You're a boring old man"
Jun 18, 2013
19,218
8,209
Oblivion Express
Sid has spoken numerous times about flattening the curve in terms of athletic ability declining as you age. He's obviously a workout warrior and fitness nut, but he's also highlighted the completive fire that still burns. I think he's an intensely competitive person, most of all with himself.

The Pens continuing to miss the playoffs will almost surely see him walk at the end of his contract. But if he feels he can still contribute in a meaningful way and the Pens are competitive, I think he's got the fire to go beyond 3 more seasons and the ability/work ethic to still be good enough to do it.

I definitely agree he's not the type to hang around just for a certain milestone or past the point where he's no longer an NHL caliber player.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,422
6,176
Visit site
Lots of competitive fire still. Since last year's trade of Geuntzel and the Pens were left for dead:

 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,535
6,062
To the bolded....I don't think that's the case?

Chelios-Jagr arguably benefit from their very long post nhl top-6F, top-3 D player, so it depends how it is done. Howe.... Trottier as a role player, I think everyone loved old Gilmour in MTL or old Selanne.

The exception could be hurting a team contract wise or getting a spot just because you are a legend and hurting the team creating resentment.

The it is not gimmick make it almost certain for it to not be the case.

If Crosby achieve to transfert all that hockey IQ, experience and old men strength to be a good third liner on a good veteran contract on the Pens (or say a MTL-TOR and sold a bit like a childhood dream to wear that jersey), I do not imagine many would mind, he have a strong that guy really love to the point of needing hockey aura around him, maybe similar to old Selanne with the Ducks.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad