“Mr vanilla” sucks but he gets Zegras and Vatrano value ina trade?
We had a top 6 issue because Stamkos has no chemistry with anybody.. sucked at ES terrible defensively and had how many plays die on his stick? Cirelli Is so bad Stamkos couldn’t get his spot at C back?
so funny that people see what they want to see and can’t change their mind. Bunch of mindless pigeons repeating the same thing about.. Jeannot, Cirelli & Stamkos. Really embarrassing
Anthony Cirelli ES Stats:
2021-2022: 13g, 21a 18mins TOI, +15, FO% 47
2022-2023: 8g, 17a 16mins TOI, +13, FO% 51
2023-2024: 15, 21a 18mins TOI, +2, FO% 49
Steven Stamkos ES Stats:
2021-2022: 26g, 44a 18mins TOI, +24, FO% 51
2022-2023: 20g, 29a 19mins TOI, -5, FO% 54
2023-2024: 21g, 20a 18mins TOI, -21, FO% 56
There is no doubt Stamkos had issues with linemates over the years to get going but MSL and Kucherov were the only gifted playmakers that have come through at an elite level to match an elite shot. Not really here to debate whether people find that as a deficiency or not but I imagine people in Washington aren't expecting Ovechkin to be the playmaker nor is the focus on Matthews to defer shots. Stamkos evolved over the years and has still been a PPG player without a 5v5 playmaker like those two (Kuch, MSL). Again, people can say what they'd like about that but if you are saying he sucked at ES, had no chemistry, and plays died on his stick, then how did he outscore Cirelli at ES? What does that make Cirelli then?
You can have a difference of opinions on players, their utilization, and purpose on the team but if the metric around these parts is to constantly shit on Stamkos, I guess I find it "so funny that people see what they want to see and can't change their mind." Stamkos is not Bergeron. The defensive side of his game has been lacking for a while, that's not new. On the other hand, Cirelli has had two seasons out of seven in this league that is by and large carrying his aura of being Bergeron lite. Another point that I see tossed around is that if you critique a player and polarize his deficiencies, you're tied to him having no value. I would have traded Cirelli before letting Stamkos walk and found a playmaker. I'm not sold on him like others are, but it doesn't mean he has no value or other GMs wouldn't line up for him. He's a good player. I don't think he's 6.25M good nor do I think he can drive a line on his own. I see three guys that can on this roster - Hagel, Point and Kucherov - and no, Stamkos didn't either, he's a passenger who needed a playmaker.
Cirelli is the better defensive player, but he's incredibly vanilla offensively. He's good for 40-50pts and has a chance to step it up this year and show he can take the reigns without the lowly, horrible defensive boat anchor that outscored him at ES in Stamkos. Let's see what happens.