Speculation: Another year of this Bluc **** (The 2024-25 season thread)

BaileyFan

Registered User
Jun 14, 2023
696
1,416
You're not getting Eichel for what they gave up for PLD. It would've cost Byfield, a top dman prospect and or Vilardi plus picks. Everyone seems to forget the massive risk it was to trade for him because of his neck. It did work out in the end, but it could've easily blown up in Vegas's face.
And you seem to forget that Eichel with a broken neck is superior to Dubois every day of the week. One of them gets you an extra $10M cap space and doesn’t actively harm you on the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Surf Nutz

AbsentMojo

F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
Apr 18, 2018
9,925
10,171
twitter.com
Lets compare legacy moves us fwd to a team like TB. They basically told Stamkos to hit the bricks - they realized he would hold them back from winning in the future. Rumors were he was offered 3m aav and he would settle for 4.5m but they didnt budge. He was like no thanks and signed with Nash for 60m over 4 yrs. To me that is TB wanting to move on from the past since that was quite the lowball offer. Thats the kind of thinking that would never occur to team legacy.
 

DoktorJeep

Fair winds and following seas Nikolai.
Aug 2, 2005
6,800
6,169
OC
The Kings tag line for the season is legacy moves us forward. I’ve seen it on towels draped on the home arena seats. And it has its own url.


This is where the marketing dollars were spent. There is no connection to toughness, blocking shots, or sacrificing your comfort level to be better.

Management is down to their last excuse. Which was the very first excuse. That the cup vets are the #1 option available to once again be a winner.

8 years ago winning was defined as winning the cup again right away. Now, winning is defined as winning something very soon.
 

chris kontos

Registered User
Feb 28, 2023
4,087
2,656
As recently as the day before yesterday, we were the champions of california. We have that legacy goin for us.
 

KopitarGOAT420

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
586
877
USA
Wait guys what if they tried this for a couple games??

Turcotte - Kopitar - Laferriere
Fiala - Byfield - Kempe
Moore - Danault - Foegele
Lee - Thomas (Lewis) - Jeannot

Byfield can't play 1C until he figures it tf out - So play him at 2C but still set him up for success by giving him two very good wingers with lots of offensive potential. Turcotte and Laferriere have been the team's two best/most consistent forwards so you reward their strong play with an opportunity to play more minutes on the top line with a good/responsible C in Kopitar. That also gives Kopi two young wingers to look after which usually causes him to elevate his game a tad. Turcotte becomes the puck hound/playmaker, Kopitar brings the strong 200ft game & composure, and Laf brings some scoring touch.

Then on the 3rd line, those three guys are all slotted where they realistically should be. All 3 of those guys are perfect 3rd liners but ideally aren't playing higher in your lineup (mostly due to lack of scoring potential). Let those guys play a shutdown/energy role and if they score some points, hey that's great.

I don't love the idea of splitting up Foegele - Turcotte - Laferriere but the Kings need to find a way to get some of their other players going and ideally need to get Byfield back to center ASAP (even if he's making some mistakes). This gets Byfield back to C and promotes Turcotte into an elevated role (Kind of serves as a "hey sorry we're moving you off center kid you've been great but the rest of our team is struggling so we're just trying to find a way to mix things up").
 

DoktorJeep

Fair winds and following seas Nikolai.
Aug 2, 2005
6,800
6,169
OC
I bet they messed up with the spelling. They meant to write, "Legace moves us forward." As in Manny Legace. He's the one in charge of driving the team bus.
“Legacy is never stagnant. It's a strong foundation, built upon with every new season.”

This is the deepest, darkest purple shade of koolaid that has been peddled by a franchise who is a founding member of the NHL HOF for propaganda.

Wait guys what if they tried this for a couple games??

Turcotte - Kopitar - Laferriere
Fiala - Byfield - Kempe
Moore - Danault - Foegele
Lee - Thomas (Lewis) - Jeannot

Byfield can't play 1C until he figures it tf out - So play him at 2C but still set him up for success by giving him two very good wingers with lots of offensive potential. Turcotte and Laferriere have been the team's two best/most consistent forwards so you reward their strong play with an opportunity to play more minutes on the top line with a good/responsible C in Kopitar. That also gives Kopi two young wingers to look after which usually causes him to elevate his game a tad. Turcotte becomes the puck hound/playmaker, Kopitar brings the strong 200ft game & composure, and Laf brings some scoring touch.

Then on the 3rd line, those three guys are all slotted where they realistically should be. All 3 of those guys are perfect 3rd liners but ideally aren't playing higher in your lineup (mostly due to lack of scoring potential). Let those guys play a shutdown/energy role and if they score some points, hey that's great.

I don't love the idea of splitting up Foegele - Turcotte - Laferriere but the Kings need to find a way to get some of their other players going and ideally need to get Byfield back to center ASAP (even if he's making some mistakes). This gets Byfield back to C and promotes Turcotte into an elevated role (Kind of serves as a "hey sorry we're moving you off center kid you've been great but the rest of our team is struggling so we're just trying to find a way to mix things up").
hEy gUyZ. What if Jim Hiller was hit by a bus before tonight’s game, and someone let Kevin Fiala put together the lineup? That’d be bitchin’, right?
 

Surf Nutz

Hockey Remote Viewer With A Frozen Finger
May 16, 2022
2,900
1,002
In the tube
clubnami.com
So that's how much of the last 3 seasons of Fialaless Kings would have looked.

We'd be going for top pick and you guys would be, lol.

Faber would solve everything, he'd have won the game for us.

JK...
 
Last edited:

Surf Nutz

Hockey Remote Viewer With A Frozen Finger
May 16, 2022
2,900
1,002
In the tube
clubnami.com
And you seem to forget that Eichel with a broken neck is superior to Dubois every day of the week. One of them gets you an extra $10M cap space and doesn’t actively harm you on the ice.

For sure we should have gone after Keagle.

Congrats to those who said it then,
Wait guys what if they tried this for a couple games??

Turcotte - Kopitar - Laferriere
Fiala - Byfield - Kempe
Moore - Danault - Foegele
Lee - Thomas (Lewis) - Jeannot

Byfield can't play 1C until he figures it tf out - So play him at 2C but still set him up for success by giving him two very good wingers with lots of offensive potential. Turcotte and Laferriere have been the team's two best/most consistent forwards so you reward their strong play with an opportunity to play more minutes on the top line with a good/responsible C in Kopitar. That also gives Kopi two young wingers to look after which usually causes him to elevate his game a tad. Turcotte becomes the puck hound/playmaker, Kopitar brings the strong 200ft game & composure, and Laf brings some scoring touch.

Then on the 3rd line, those three guys are all slotted where they realistically should be. All 3 of those guys are perfect 3rd liners but ideally aren't playing higher in your lineup (mostly due to lack of scoring potential). Let those guys play a shutdown/energy role and if they score some points, hey that's great.

I don't love the idea of splitting up Foegele - Turcotte - Laferriere but the Kings need to find a way to get some of their other players going and ideally need to get Byfield back to center ASAP (even if he's making some mistakes). This gets Byfield back to C and promotes Turcotte into an elevated role (Kind of serves as a "hey sorry we're moving you off center kid you've been great but the rest of our team is struggling so we're just trying to find a way to mix things up").
Like it , modify slightly.

Turcotte - Kopi - Moore

Fi - QB- AK

Fog - PD - Laffy

TJ - Lewis - Akil

Gotta stop moving Byfield around.

He figure it out on wing was looking fire at C and now he is 2 steps back , even the successful moves took a while.

It's not worth having him take steps back.

Management may be on its last excuse or it may not be.
“Legacy is never stagnant. It's a strong foundation, built upon with every new season.”

This is the deepest, darkest purple shade of koolaid that has been peddled by a franchise who is a founding member of the NHL HOF for propaganda.


hEy gUyZ. What if Jim Hiller was hit by a bus before tonight’s game, and someone let Kevin Fiala put together the lineup? That’d be bitchin’, right?

Totally Bitchin Joktor Deep!

Google-Ergebnis für https://static.wixstatic.com/media/f81c53_fa88788a35464ce99b11c128b5eef180~mv2.png/v1/fit/w_2500,h_1330,al_c/f81c53_fa88788a35464ce99b11c128b5eef180~mv2.png
 
Last edited:

Surf Nutz

Hockey Remote Viewer With A Frozen Finger
May 16, 2022
2,900
1,002
In the tube
clubnami.com
EK article aside, this is the time to move Gavrikov. Hopefully to a bubble team with better prospects & a lower first. He's holding down the RD #1 position. Waiting until later in the season will result in a late first & prospect from a team with a depleted pool. If he isn't re-signed, ship him & move on.

There is the downside of being in the WC race. It shouldn't be too hard to bring in a filter to temporarily plug the hole. King's should still be able to beat bad teams & lose to good teams.

Note: watching the Sharks game tomorrow. Hope the King's can still beat "bad" teams. :laugh:

**Fiala thing is timed well. Remember when Blake got angry & shipped Pearson? Kinda feels like we're entering that situation again.

Not as ,much as after the Sharks loss.

Management and coaches are trying to not get fired.

They can't afford to not give Fiala time to come back after an automatic miss penalty.

Fiala had some Fiala moments last season and came back tightened it up and contributed.

Player salaries have only goes up, he ain't getting traded at this time.


This is why I didn’t buy into the idea that getting rid of the 1-3-1 was some great thing that was going to finally unlock the team’s potential and let them pop off. This roster simply isn’t good enough to play anything other than low-event trap anti-hockey and win games. The best players on the team are old heads that prefer to slow the game down to a crawl and the one guy with the skill set suited to a more open style is already in the doghouse and has predictably gone off the rails now that Doughty isn’t here to call him out in the postgame media.

It’s only a matter of time until they bring back the 1-3-1 in a bid to keep from falling out of the playoff race.

Wrong the players hated 131 .

We'll be playing it for the season.

Talking about firing management is a voodoo curse that causes them to never get fired.

So thanks

On behalf of them!
 

FSL KINGS

Registered User
May 10, 2021
2,922
2,628
Not as ,much as after the Sharks loss.

Management and coaches are trying to not get fired.

They can't afford to not give Fiala time to come back after an automatic miss penalty.

Fiala had some Fiala moments last season and came back tightened it up and contributed.

Player salaries have only goes up, he ain't getting traded at this time.
Don't think Fiala will be moved. Didn't word it well. Think the pressure is building. Fiala drama is pilings on & raising the stakes.

Blake is in a pickle.
Losing Gavrikov for nothing after losing Roy for nothing is going to be ripped apart.
Blake needs a new contract.
King's jumped in the standings, but are not playing great currently.

What trade would actually help the King's win games? Legitimate 1-2 C? Top4 right D? Goal is as good as it gets for now.

How does Blake pull this off with no cap?
:popcorn:
 

Herby

How could Blake have known?
Feb 27, 2002
26,799
17,027
Great Lakes Area
Wait guys what if they tried this for a couple games??

Turcotte - Kopitar - Laferriere
Fiala - Byfield - Kempe
Moore - Danault - Foegele
Lee - Thomas (Lewis) - Jeannot

Byfield can't play 1C until he figures it tf out - So play him at 2C but still set him up for success by giving him two very good wingers with lots of offensive potential. Turcotte and Laferriere have been the team's two best/most consistent forwards so you reward their strong play with an opportunity to play more minutes on the top line with a good/responsible C in Kopitar. That also gives Kopi two young wingers to look after which usually causes him to elevate his game a tad. Turcotte becomes the puck hound/playmaker, Kopitar brings the strong 200ft game & composure, and Laf brings some scoring touch.

Then on the 3rd line, those three guys are all slotted where they realistically should be. All 3 of those guys are perfect 3rd liners but ideally aren't playing higher in your lineup (mostly due to lack of scoring potential). Let those guys play a shutdown/energy role and if they score some points, hey that's great.

I don't love the idea of splitting up Foegele - Turcotte - Laferriere but the Kings need to find a way to get some of their other players going and ideally need to get Byfield back to center ASAP (even if he's making some mistakes). This gets Byfield back to C and promotes Turcotte into an elevated role (Kind of serves as a "hey sorry we're moving you off center kid you've been great but the rest of our team is struggling so we're just trying to find a way to mix things up").

Turcotte has 2 goals in 42 career games, he has not been able to consistently beat goaltenders since he was 17 in the USHL.

Why are we putting him on the 1st line? He has looked good in the role he has been given, which is great, so why try and put him in a scoring winger role where he is going to fail? You need to slot players into roles where they can thrive, are these guys in first line scoring roles being put into roles where they will thrive?

Turcotte-Kopitar-Laff would be an awesome, championship caliber 3rd line if Blake had actually been able to draft and develop Kopitar's replacement. You know if they had drafted say Suzuki in 2017 and Stutzle in 2020, but Blake of course made the wrong moves as always.
You're not getting Eichel for what they gave up for PLD. It would've cost Byfield, a top dman prospect and or Vilardi plus picks. Everyone seems to forget the massive risk it was to trade for him because of his neck. It did work out in the end, but it could've easily blown up in Vegas's face.
This is not true, back when there were rumors of a potential trade it was understood that Byfield was not on the table.

Blake passed on Eichel because he was terrified of Eichel getting hurt and he'd have made a huge mistake on such a big deal, and then within two years of the Eichel trade Blake made two of the worst trades in the NHL in the last five years. Which is to be expected when you are pressing to try and fit into such a small window that Blake himself created by trying to win with two ancient players as the building blocks.

Eichel was good enough to build around and he was the goldielocks age where he would have been useful as the best player on a last go run with 11 and 8 and also been able to be the face of the next generation. It was a massive blunder by Blake not pursuing it, and that massive blunder directly led to the two horrific trades he ended up making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Piston

Surf Nutz

Hockey Remote Viewer With A Frozen Finger
May 16, 2022
2,900
1,002
In the tube
clubnami.com
Don't think Fiala will be moved. Didn't word it well. Think the pressure is building. Fiala drama is pilings on & raising the stakes.

Blake is in a pickle.
Losing Gavrikov for nothing after losing Roy for nothing is going to be ripped apart.
Blake needs a new contract.
King's jumped in the standings, but are not playing great currently.

What trade would actually help the King's win games? Legitimate 1-2 C? Top4 right D? Goal is as good as it gets for now.

How does Blake pull this off with no cap?
:popcorn:

Only one real disagreement.

Blake's m.o. is to hold players for the playoffs ala Roy and Gav is next.

Unless they fall way down before deadline.

No trades soon.

This year especially Blake is all in for self preservation.

They are not getting D .

It will be like getting one when DD returns.
 

Herby

How could Blake have known?
Feb 27, 2002
26,799
17,027
Great Lakes Area
Rob Blake on the playoff fringe at the trade-deadline with his job on the line is a terrifying thought.

He will be fleeced again, one last parting gift from the most destructive GM in team history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schmooley

kingsfan28

Its A Kingspiracy !
Feb 27, 2005
40,351
9,425
Corsi Hill
Turcotte has 2 goals in 42 career games, he has not been able to consistently beat goaltenders since he was 17 in the USHL.

Why are we putting him on the 1st line? He has looked good in the role he has been given, which is great, so why try and put him in a scoring winger role where he is going to fail? You need to slot players into roles where they can thrive, are these guys in first line scoring roles being put into roles where they will thrive?

Turcotte-Kopitar-Laff would be an awesome, championship caliber 3rd line if Blake had actually been able to draft and develop Kopitar's replacement. You know if they had drafted say Suzuki in 2017 and Stutzle in 2020, but Blake of course made the wrong moves as always.

This is not true, back when there were rumors of a potential trade it was understood that Byfield was not on the table.

Blake passed on Eichel because he was terrified of Eichel getting hurt
and he'd have made a huge mistake on such a big deal, and then within two years of the Eichel trade Blake made two of the worst trades in the NHL in the last five years. Which is to be expected when you are pressing to try and fit into such a small window that Blake himself created by trying to win with two ancient players as the building blocks.

Eichel was good enough to build around and he was the goldielocks age where he would have been useful as the best player on a last go run with 11 and 8 and also been able to be the face of the next generation. It was a massive blunder by Blake not pursuing it, and that massive blunder directly led to the two horrific trades he ended up making.

Every team with assets was, not just Blake. Without the injury concerns, it's a different trade market.Like I said, it was a very risky move that paid off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KopitarGOAT420

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,527
7,599
Visit site
Lets compare legacy moves us fwd to a team like TB. They basically told Stamkos to hit the bricks - they realized he would hold them back from winning in the future. Rumors were he was offered 3m aav and he would settle for 4.5m but they didnt budge. He was like no thanks and signed with Nash for 60m over 4 yrs. To me that is TB wanting to move on from the past since that was quite the lowball offer. Thats the kind of thinking that would never occur to team legacy.

And 34 when this happened, not 29. Not that TB is going to be winning another Cup with their aging big contract top heavy roster that hasn't been out of the 1st rd since 2022.

They should've already started rebuilding, not giving a 30 year old mercenary winger $9m on the cap until 2031.
 

GoldenBearHockey

Registered User
Jan 6, 2014
10,235
4,312
Hiller exemplifies whats wrong with this org... Afraid of talent.. would kill to have a roster full of JADs and Roys


Absolutely ZERO wrong with what he said.....anyone who things you can take any kind of chance you want in the NHL, hasn't been paying attention the past, 100 years or so.

He didn't say he has to stop, he didn't say he was wrong, he said, he needs to be careful when he does it, OMG the horrible things he said, how dare he, are you guys kidding me?

And 34 when this happened, not 29. Not that TB is going to be winning another Cup with their aging big contract top heavy roster that hasn't been out of the 1st rd since 2022.

They should've already started rebuilding, not giving a 30 year old mercenary winger $9m on the cap until 2031.

Nope, all that matters is that they moved on from Stamkos, showing that teams can do that.....like Pittsburgh with Cros....wait....Washington with Ove....shit....umm...hold on....Vancouver with the Sedi.....oh f***....some team did it somewhere else.......with a 29 year old future HOFer
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Remparts666

bland

Registered User
Jul 1, 2004
7,948
12,167
Odd thing to say when he's leading the team in assists and is point per game
How is it odd?

What do stats have to do with poor defensive decisions? Of course a coach has to monitor minutes and praise on a young player who makes a lot of mistakes. You have to learn from those in order to progress, and a massive part of that education comes from discipline.

This just smacks of wanting to be upset about something that is a big, fat nothing.
 

KopitarGOAT420

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
586
877
USA
Man, people around the NHL are raving about Clarke right now after that performance last night and rightfully so. Tied for 3rd in the NHL for points among defenseman and leading the Kings in assists (one point back from being tied with Kopi for the team lead in points).

I understand it's only an 11 game sample size but he's doing this as a 21 year old. Pretty damn impressive stuff.

If Clarke keeps playing like this, I don't think it's an overstatement to say he completely changes this Kings team. The Kings have been missing a dynamic point producer on the blue line for YEARS and Clarke might finally be just that. Even with Doughty, there was always a good amount of offense to his game but never really a great/elite level of offense. It was always more the 200ft game for Doughty. With Clarke, we might legitimately have an elite offensive defenseman capable of putting up 60+ points year after year. Adding a player like that to a team that's already made the playoffs the last couple years is massive. Really great to see from the young d man.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad